Lower and slower: Quantifying phosphorus leaching from struvite relative to monoammonium phosphate by 33P radioisotopic labeling

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Patricia Leon , Neha Chatterjee , Chongyang Li , Andrew J. Margenot
{"title":"Lower and slower: Quantifying phosphorus leaching from struvite relative to monoammonium phosphate by 33P radioisotopic labeling","authors":"Patricia Leon ,&nbsp;Neha Chatterjee ,&nbsp;Chongyang Li ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Margenot","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Struvite (NH<sub>4</sub>MgPO<sub>4</sub>·6H<sub>2</sub>O) is a slow-release phosphorus (P) fertilizer hypothesized to reduce nutrient leaching losses relative to highly water-soluble counterparts such as monoammonium phosphate (MAP). We assessed the leaching fate of P from struvite relative to MAP using soil column experiments for two soils representative of the United States Maize Belt, an Arguidoll and a Fragiudalf. Inorganic P and N in leachate (49.8 pore volumes (v<sub>p</sub>)) were directly quantified for synthesized <sup>33</sup>P-labeled struvite and <sup>33</sup>P-labeled MAP directly and indirectly by omission method (i.e., by difference with a P-unfertilized treatment). By 8.3 v<sub>p</sub>, less than 0.02 % of struvite-P was leached in the Fragiudalf according to both methods of determination, compared to 11.1 % MAP-P determined directly by <sup>33</sup>P tracing and 14.1 % of MAP-P by the omission method. Fertilizer-P leached quantified directly by <sup>33</sup>P labeling was on average 1.2- to 3.7-fold lower than by indirectly by omission for both fertilizers at 2.8–13.9 v<sub>p</sub> across both soils, indicating consistent overestimation in P leaching by the commonly used omission method. Leaching of struvite-N was an order of magnitude lower than MAP-N in the Fragiudalf after 8.3 v<sub>p</sub>. Struvite entailed 17.4 %–20.4 % lower P leaching and 22.1–46 % lower N leaching compared to MAP across soils under simulated extreme precipitation events, supporting the hypothesized ability of struvite to reduce P as well as N leaching relative to more water-soluble ammonium phosphate fertilizers such as MAP. Additionally, our results point to a methodological need to validate fertilizer P leaching estimated by the commonly used omission method using direct quantification by radioisotopic labeling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002192/pdfft?md5=f83e42f51bbea353c9968e3a38a941a7&pid=1-s2.0-S0016706124002192-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Struvite (NH4MgPO4·6H2O) is a slow-release phosphorus (P) fertilizer hypothesized to reduce nutrient leaching losses relative to highly water-soluble counterparts such as monoammonium phosphate (MAP). We assessed the leaching fate of P from struvite relative to MAP using soil column experiments for two soils representative of the United States Maize Belt, an Arguidoll and a Fragiudalf. Inorganic P and N in leachate (49.8 pore volumes (vp)) were directly quantified for synthesized 33P-labeled struvite and 33P-labeled MAP directly and indirectly by omission method (i.e., by difference with a P-unfertilized treatment). By 8.3 vp, less than 0.02 % of struvite-P was leached in the Fragiudalf according to both methods of determination, compared to 11.1 % MAP-P determined directly by 33P tracing and 14.1 % of MAP-P by the omission method. Fertilizer-P leached quantified directly by 33P labeling was on average 1.2- to 3.7-fold lower than by indirectly by omission for both fertilizers at 2.8–13.9 vp across both soils, indicating consistent overestimation in P leaching by the commonly used omission method. Leaching of struvite-N was an order of magnitude lower than MAP-N in the Fragiudalf after 8.3 vp. Struvite entailed 17.4 %–20.4 % lower P leaching and 22.1–46 % lower N leaching compared to MAP across soils under simulated extreme precipitation events, supporting the hypothesized ability of struvite to reduce P as well as N leaching relative to more water-soluble ammonium phosphate fertilizers such as MAP. Additionally, our results point to a methodological need to validate fertilizer P leaching estimated by the commonly used omission method using direct quantification by radioisotopic labeling.

更低更慢通过 33P 放射性同位素标记量化相对于磷酸一铵而言从硬石膏中沥滤出的磷
据推测,相对于磷酸一铵(MAP)等高水溶性肥料,硬石膏(NHMgPO-6HO)是一种缓释磷(P)肥料,可减少养分沥滤损失。我们对美国玉米带具有代表性的两种土壤--阿吉多尔(Arguidoll)和弗拉基乌达夫(Fragiudalf)--进行了土柱实验,评估了相对于磷酸一铵(MAP)而言,从硬石膏中沥滤出的磷的去向。对合成的 P 标记硬石膏和 P 标记 MAP 的浸出液(49.8 孔隙体积)中的无机 P 和 N 进行了直接量化,并通过省略法(即与未施 P 肥的处理方法进行比较)进行了间接量化。到 8.3 v 时,根据这两种测定方法,在 Fragiudalf 中浸出的石英石-P 均小于 0.02%,而直接用 P 示踪法测定的 MAP-P 为 11.1%,用省略法测定的 MAP-P 为 14.1%。在两种土壤中,通过 P 标记法直接量化的肥料-P 沥滤量平均为 2.8-13.9 v,比通过省略法间接量化的肥料-P 沥滤量低 1.2-3.7 倍,这表明常用的省略法始终高估了 P 沥滤量。在模拟极端降水事件下,与 MAP 相比,硬石膏在不同土壤中的磷沥滤量降低了 17.4%-20.4%,氮沥滤量降低了 22.1%-46%,这支持了硬石膏与水溶性更强的磷铵肥料(如 MAP)相比能够减少磷和氮沥滤的假设。此外,我们的研究结果还表明,在方法学上需要利用放射性同位素标记直接定量的方法来验证通过常用的遗漏法估算的肥料沥滤量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信