Unveiling the Mechanisms of the 1819 M 7.7 Kachchh Earthquake, India: Integrating Physics-Based Simulation and Strong Ground Motion Estimates

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
T. C. Sunilkumar, Zhenguo Zhang, Zijia Wang, Wenqiang Wang, Zhongqiu He
{"title":"Unveiling the Mechanisms of the 1819 M 7.7 Kachchh Earthquake, India: Integrating Physics-Based Simulation and Strong Ground Motion Estimates","authors":"T. C. Sunilkumar,&nbsp;Zhenguo Zhang,&nbsp;Zijia Wang,&nbsp;Wenqiang Wang,&nbsp;Zhongqiu He","doi":"10.1029/2023EA003308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the source process of the 1819 M 7.7 Kachchh Indian earthquake using physics-based dynamic rupture modeling and strong ground motion simulations. We successfully simulated the spontaneous dynamic rupture along a curved non-planar fault using the 3-D curved-grid finite-difference method (CGFDM). The estimated earthquake magnitude is around 7.6, consistent with previous estimations. Our simulations accurately replicated macroscopic rupture patterns and surface deformation, showing agreement with observed data along the Allah Bund fault (ABF) with a maximum displacement ∼5.5 m at the Earth's surface. The maximum modeled coseismic slip on the fault was approximately 7.5 m. Notably, the ABF exhibited characteristics of a weak barrier (leaky barrier) at the bending part, allowing the rupture to propagate further. Despite limitations in surface deformation calculations, the modeled values aligned with the trend of surface fault slip, with a slight deviation in the epicenter toward the east compared to earlier studies. We observed a homogeneous principal stress oriented N25°E, consistent with the present day Indian plate motion. The estimated horizontal peak ground velocities (PGVh) and the maximum value of Intensity X<sup>+</sup> aligns well with observations. Furthermore, conducting thorough case studies on significant earthquakes and potential seismic scenarios in stable continental regions is crucial. Such studies play a vital role in validating and improving dynamic rupture models. When combined with statistical methods, this research holds great promise for advancing seismic hazard assessments, earthquake engineering, and strategies for disaster management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023EA003308","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023EA003308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the source process of the 1819 M 7.7 Kachchh Indian earthquake using physics-based dynamic rupture modeling and strong ground motion simulations. We successfully simulated the spontaneous dynamic rupture along a curved non-planar fault using the 3-D curved-grid finite-difference method (CGFDM). The estimated earthquake magnitude is around 7.6, consistent with previous estimations. Our simulations accurately replicated macroscopic rupture patterns and surface deformation, showing agreement with observed data along the Allah Bund fault (ABF) with a maximum displacement ∼5.5 m at the Earth's surface. The maximum modeled coseismic slip on the fault was approximately 7.5 m. Notably, the ABF exhibited characteristics of a weak barrier (leaky barrier) at the bending part, allowing the rupture to propagate further. Despite limitations in surface deformation calculations, the modeled values aligned with the trend of surface fault slip, with a slight deviation in the epicenter toward the east compared to earlier studies. We observed a homogeneous principal stress oriented N25°E, consistent with the present day Indian plate motion. The estimated horizontal peak ground velocities (PGVh) and the maximum value of Intensity X+ aligns well with observations. Furthermore, conducting thorough case studies on significant earthquakes and potential seismic scenarios in stable continental regions is crucial. Such studies play a vital role in validating and improving dynamic rupture models. When combined with statistical methods, this research holds great promise for advancing seismic hazard assessments, earthquake engineering, and strategies for disaster management.

Abstract Image

揭示 1819 年印度卡奇 7.7 级地震的机理:基于物理学的模拟与强地动仪估算的结合
本研究利用基于物理学的动态断裂建模和强地面运动模拟,全面了解了 1819 年印度卡奇 7.7 级地震的震源过程。我们利用三维曲面网格有限差分法(CGFDM)成功模拟了沿弯曲非平面断层的自发动态破裂。估计震级约为 7.6 级,与之前的估计一致。我们的模拟准确复制了宏观断裂模式和地表变形,与沿阿拉外滩断层(ABF)的观测数据一致,地表最大位移∼5.5 米。值得注意的是,阿拉外滩断层在弯曲部分表现出弱屏障(泄漏屏障)的特征,允许断裂进一步扩展。尽管地表变形计算有局限性,但模型值与地表断层滑动趋势一致,与早期研究相比,震中向东略有偏差。我们观测到了均匀的主应力,其方向为 N25°E,与当今印度板块运动一致。估计的水平峰值地面速度(PGVh)和强度 X+ 的最大值与观测结果非常吻合。此外,对稳定大陆地区的重大地震和潜在地震情况进行全面的案例研究至关重要。此类研究对验证和改进动态破裂模型起着至关重要的作用。结合统计方法,这项研究有望推动地震灾害评估、地震工程和灾害管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信