Do Mexican consumers really care about hen welfare? Understanding their attitudes, constraints and willingness to pay for cage-free eggs

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Laura X. Estévez-Moreno , Morris Villarroel , Genaro C. Miranda-de la Lama
{"title":"Do Mexican consumers really care about hen welfare? Understanding their attitudes, constraints and willingness to pay for cage-free eggs","authors":"Laura X. Estévez-Moreno ,&nbsp;Morris Villarroel ,&nbsp;Genaro C. Miranda-de la Lama","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mexico has the highest per capita egg consumption in the world and ranks fifth in international egg production. Currently, there is a lack of data on consumer attitudes towards the welfare of laying hens (WLH) and their willingness-to-pay-a-price-premium (WTPPP) for cage-free eggs. To address this gap, a survey was conducted among 1040 Mexican egg consumers in different shopping venues. The average level of concern about hen welfare was 8.6/10, with higher levels of concern among female respondents and those aged 50 and over. Consumers agreed on the impact of welfare conditions on egg quality and the need for hens to be able to express natural behaviors. However, they lacked sufficient information about existing regulations and how hens are reared. At least 54% of consumers were willing to pay a price premium for cage-free eggs and could be further categorized into three groups based on the percentage of price premium they were willing to pay. Gender and age were significant factors differentiating consumer attitudes towards hen welfare at the socio-demographic level. However, these attitudes did not determine WTPPP for cage-free eggs. In contrast, education level played a crucial role in determining WTPPP, but not attitudes towards WLH. Our results indicate that paying premiums for cage-free eggs is insufficient to drive the industry’s conversion to cage-free housing systems for egg production. Rather, a strategy should be implemented to provide consumers with reliable information about alternative production systems to cages and their positive and negative impacts on WLH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 105292"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001940/pdfft?md5=eaa30268aa5282b4dfd538e7d28ecb9f&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324001940-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001940","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mexico has the highest per capita egg consumption in the world and ranks fifth in international egg production. Currently, there is a lack of data on consumer attitudes towards the welfare of laying hens (WLH) and their willingness-to-pay-a-price-premium (WTPPP) for cage-free eggs. To address this gap, a survey was conducted among 1040 Mexican egg consumers in different shopping venues. The average level of concern about hen welfare was 8.6/10, with higher levels of concern among female respondents and those aged 50 and over. Consumers agreed on the impact of welfare conditions on egg quality and the need for hens to be able to express natural behaviors. However, they lacked sufficient information about existing regulations and how hens are reared. At least 54% of consumers were willing to pay a price premium for cage-free eggs and could be further categorized into three groups based on the percentage of price premium they were willing to pay. Gender and age were significant factors differentiating consumer attitudes towards hen welfare at the socio-demographic level. However, these attitudes did not determine WTPPP for cage-free eggs. In contrast, education level played a crucial role in determining WTPPP, but not attitudes towards WLH. Our results indicate that paying premiums for cage-free eggs is insufficient to drive the industry’s conversion to cage-free housing systems for egg production. Rather, a strategy should be implemented to provide consumers with reliable information about alternative production systems to cages and their positive and negative impacts on WLH.

墨西哥消费者真的关心母鸡福利吗?了解他们对无笼养鸡蛋的态度、限制因素和支付意愿
墨西哥是世界上人均鸡蛋消费量最高的国家,在国际鸡蛋产量中排名第五。目前,有关消费者对蛋鸡福利(WLH)的态度及其对无笼养鸡蛋的价格溢价意愿(WTPPP)的数据还很缺乏。为了填补这一空白,我们在不同的购物场所对 1040 名墨西哥鸡蛋消费者进行了调查。消费者对母鸡福利的平均关注度为 8.6/10,女性受访者和 50 岁及以上的受访者关注度更高。消费者认同福利条件对鸡蛋质量的影响,以及母鸡表达自然行为的必要性。然而,他们对现行法规和母鸡饲养方式缺乏足够的了解。至少有 54% 的消费者愿意为无笼养鸡蛋支付溢价,根据他们愿意支付的溢价百分比,可进一步分为三类。在社会人口层面,性别和年龄是区分消费者对母鸡福利态度的重要因素。然而,这些态度并不能决定无笼鸡蛋的WTPPP。与此相反,教育水平在决定 WTPPP 方面起着关键作用,但对 WLH 的态度却不起作用。我们的研究结果表明,为无笼养鸡蛋支付溢价不足以推动整个行业转用无笼养蛋鸡饲养系统。相反,应该实施一项战略,为消费者提供有关笼养蛋鸡的替代生产系统及其对 WLH 的积极和消极影响的可靠信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信