Emergency water distribution systems to improve spatial equality and spatial equity in a heterogeneous community with differing mobility characteristics

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Emergency water distribution systems to improve spatial equality and spatial equity in a heterogeneous community with differing mobility characteristics","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our study addresses challenges in emergency water distribution systems by proposing a hybrid method that optimizes points of distribution (PODs) and mobile delivery systems. The goal is to optimally dispense emergency water to disaster-affected populations while enhancing spatial equality and spatial equity. By considering the physiological and socioeconomic status of the disaster-affected population, our hybrid method addresses the needs of a heterogeneous community. The hybrid method consists of two models: The first model seeks to determine the optimal locations of POD for populations who are deemed physiologically able to visit PODs and pick up their emergency water. In this model, socioeconomic status is incorporated to account for different mobility characteristics of these populations. The second model focuses on determining efficient routes for mobile delivery to populations who are more likely to have physiological limitations that interfere with them traveling to PODs and picking up their emergency water. The proposed method is then validated with an application to the Flint, Michigan, water crisis. Our experiments demonstrate that, compared to the actual setup of PODs, our method shows a 69.30 % improvement in objective function value and a 7.05 % reduction in the average travel time for people to reach the PODs. Particularly beneficial for those with the longest travel time to the PODs, the model indicates a significant 25.22 % decrease in travel time, equivalent to 19.49 min. Also, our method suggests the optimal delivery solution involving 20 trucks covering 191.82 km for the target populations. We further conduct a sensitivity analysis to discuss the potential impact of various factors on the operations of the emergency water distribution system. Our results highlight that increasing the number of depots does not necessarily lead to a proportional decrease in vehicle kilometers traveled. We also identify that the most cost-effective vehicle type is a 16-foot truck. These findings provide emergency agencies and policymakers with valuable insights, paving the way for improved guidelines and policies to establish more effective emergency water distribution systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924004928","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study addresses challenges in emergency water distribution systems by proposing a hybrid method that optimizes points of distribution (PODs) and mobile delivery systems. The goal is to optimally dispense emergency water to disaster-affected populations while enhancing spatial equality and spatial equity. By considering the physiological and socioeconomic status of the disaster-affected population, our hybrid method addresses the needs of a heterogeneous community. The hybrid method consists of two models: The first model seeks to determine the optimal locations of POD for populations who are deemed physiologically able to visit PODs and pick up their emergency water. In this model, socioeconomic status is incorporated to account for different mobility characteristics of these populations. The second model focuses on determining efficient routes for mobile delivery to populations who are more likely to have physiological limitations that interfere with them traveling to PODs and picking up their emergency water. The proposed method is then validated with an application to the Flint, Michigan, water crisis. Our experiments demonstrate that, compared to the actual setup of PODs, our method shows a 69.30 % improvement in objective function value and a 7.05 % reduction in the average travel time for people to reach the PODs. Particularly beneficial for those with the longest travel time to the PODs, the model indicates a significant 25.22 % decrease in travel time, equivalent to 19.49 min. Also, our method suggests the optimal delivery solution involving 20 trucks covering 191.82 km for the target populations. We further conduct a sensitivity analysis to discuss the potential impact of various factors on the operations of the emergency water distribution system. Our results highlight that increasing the number of depots does not necessarily lead to a proportional decrease in vehicle kilometers traveled. We also identify that the most cost-effective vehicle type is a 16-foot truck. These findings provide emergency agencies and policymakers with valuable insights, paving the way for improved guidelines and policies to establish more effective emergency water distribution systems.

在具有不同流动性特征的异质社区中,利用应急配水系统改善空间平等和空间公平性
我们的研究提出了一种优化配水点(PODs)和移动输水系统的混合方法,以应对应急配水系统所面临的挑战。我们的目标是在加强空间平等和空间公平的同时,以最佳方式向受灾人口分发应急水。通过考虑受灾人口的生理和社会经济状况,我们的混合方法可以满足异质社区的需求。混合方法由两个模型组成:第一个模型旨在为那些被认为在生理上有能力前往 POD 并领取应急水的人群确定 POD 的最佳位置。在该模型中,社会经济地位也被纳入其中,以考虑到这些人群不同的流动性特征。第二个模型的重点是确定有效的移动送水路线,以帮助那些更有可能因生理限制而无法前往 POD 点领取应急水的人群。随后,我们将在密歇根州弗林特市的水危机中应用所提出的方法进行验证。实验表明,与实际设置的 POD 相比,我们的方法在目标函数值上提高了 69.30%,人们到达 POD 的平均旅行时间缩短了 7.05%。特别是对于那些到达 POD 的旅行时间最长的人群,模型显示旅行时间显著减少了 25.22%,相当于 19.49 分钟。此外,我们的方法还为目标人群提出了最佳配送方案,即使用 20 辆卡车配送 191.82 千米。我们进一步进行了敏感性分析,讨论了各种因素对应急配水系统运行的潜在影响。我们的分析结果表明,增加配送站数量并不一定会导致车辆行驶公里数成比例地减少。我们还发现,最具成本效益的车辆类型是 16 英尺卡车。这些发现为应急机构和政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解,为改进指导方针和政策,建立更有效的应急配水系统铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信