Impact of longitudinal tumor location on postoperative outcomes in gallbladder cancer: Fundus and body vs. neck and cystic duct, a retrospective multicenter study.

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kil Hwan Kim, Ju Ik Moon, Jae Woo Park, Yunghun You, Hae Il Jung, Hanlim Choi, Si Eun Hwang, Sungho Jo
{"title":"Impact of longitudinal tumor location on postoperative outcomes in gallbladder cancer: Fundus and body vs. neck and cystic duct, a retrospective multicenter study.","authors":"Kil Hwan Kim, Ju Ik Moon, Jae Woo Park, Yunghun You, Hae Il Jung, Hanlim Choi, Si Eun Hwang, Sungho Jo","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Systematic investigations into the prognostic impact of the longitudinal tumor location in gallbladder cancer (GBC) remain insufficient. To address the limitations of our pilot study, we conducted a multicenter investigation to clarify the impact of the longitudinal tumor location on the oncological outcomes of GBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 372 patients undergoing radical resections for GBC from January 2010 to December 2019 across seven hospitals that belong to the Daejeon-Chungcheong branch of the Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Patients were divided into GBC in the fundus/body (FB-GBC) and GBC in the neck/cystic duct (NC-GBC) groups, based on the longitudinal tumor location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 372 patients, 282 had FB-GBC, while 90 had NC-GBC. NC-GBC was associated with more frequent elevation of preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels, requirement for more extensive surgery, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, more frequent lymphovascular and perineural invasion, lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed these findings, showing lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse survival rates in the NC-GBC group. Multivariate analysis identified elevated preoperative CA 19-9 levels, lymph node metastasis, and non-R0 resection as independent prognostic factors, but not longitudinal tumor location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NC-GBC exhibits more frequent elevation of preoperative CA 19-9 levels, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, lower R0 resection rates, and poorer overall and disease-free survival rates, compared to FB-GBC. However, the longitudinal tumor location was not analyzed as an independent prognostic factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: Systematic investigations into the prognostic impact of the longitudinal tumor location in gallbladder cancer (GBC) remain insufficient. To address the limitations of our pilot study, we conducted a multicenter investigation to clarify the impact of the longitudinal tumor location on the oncological outcomes of GBC.

Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 372 patients undergoing radical resections for GBC from January 2010 to December 2019 across seven hospitals that belong to the Daejeon-Chungcheong branch of the Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Patients were divided into GBC in the fundus/body (FB-GBC) and GBC in the neck/cystic duct (NC-GBC) groups, based on the longitudinal tumor location.

Results: Of 372 patients, 282 had FB-GBC, while 90 had NC-GBC. NC-GBC was associated with more frequent elevation of preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels, requirement for more extensive surgery, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, more frequent lymphovascular and perineural invasion, lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed these findings, showing lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse survival rates in the NC-GBC group. Multivariate analysis identified elevated preoperative CA 19-9 levels, lymph node metastasis, and non-R0 resection as independent prognostic factors, but not longitudinal tumor location.

Conclusions: NC-GBC exhibits more frequent elevation of preoperative CA 19-9 levels, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, lower R0 resection rates, and poorer overall and disease-free survival rates, compared to FB-GBC. However, the longitudinal tumor location was not analyzed as an independent prognostic factor.

肿瘤纵向位置对胆囊癌术后结果的影响:胆囊底和胆囊体与胆囊颈和胆囊管的对比,一项回顾性多中心研究。
背景/目的:关于胆囊癌(GBC)纵向肿瘤位置对预后影响的系统研究仍然不足。针对试验性研究的局限性,我们开展了一项多中心调查,以明确纵向肿瘤位置对 GBC 肿瘤预后的影响:方法:我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在韩国肝胆胰外科协会大田-忠清分会所属七家医院接受 GBC 根治性切除术的 372 例患者进行了回顾性多中心研究。根据肿瘤的纵向位置,将患者分为胃底/体部 GBC 组(FB-GBC)和颈部/囊管 GBC 组(NC-GBC):在372名患者中,282人患有FB-GBC,90人患有NC-GBC。NC-GBC与以下因素相关:术前碳水化合物抗原(CA)19-9水平升高更频繁、需要更广泛的手术、组织学分级和肿瘤分期更晚期、淋巴管和神经周围侵犯更频繁、R0切除率更低、复发率更高、5年总生存率和无病生存率更低。倾向得分匹配分析证实了这些结果,显示NC-GBC组的R0切除率较低、复发率较高,生存率较低。多变量分析发现,术前CA 19-9水平升高、淋巴结转移和非R0切除是独立的预后因素,但纵向肿瘤位置不是:与FB-GBC相比,NC-GBC术前CA 19-9水平升高的频率更高,组织学分级和肿瘤分期更晚,R0切除率更低,总生存率和无病生存率更低。然而,纵向肿瘤位置并未作为独立的预后因素进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信