Brain Evoked Response Qualification Using Multi-Set Consensus Clustering: Toward Single-Trial EEG Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Topography Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s10548-024-01074-y
Reza Mahini, Guanghui Zhang, Tiina Parviainen, Rainer Düsing, Asoke K Nandi, Fengyu Cong, Timo Hämäläinen
{"title":"Brain Evoked Response Qualification Using Multi-Set Consensus Clustering: Toward Single-Trial EEG Analysis.","authors":"Reza Mahini, Guanghui Zhang, Tiina Parviainen, Rainer Düsing, Asoke K Nandi, Fengyu Cong, Timo Hämäläinen","doi":"10.1007/s10548-024-01074-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In event-related potential (ERP) analysis, it is commonly assumed that individual trials from a subject share similar properties and originate from comparable neural sources, allowing reliable interpretation of group-averages. Nevertheless, traditional group-level ERP analysis methods, including cluster analysis, often overlook critical information about individual subjects' neural processes due to using fixed measurement intervals derived from averaging. We developed a multi-set consensus clustering pipeline to examine cognitive processes at the individual subject level. Initially, consensus clustering from diverse methods was applied to single-trial EEG epochs of individual subjects. Subsequently, a second level of consensus clustering was performed across the trials of each subject. A newly modified time window determination method was then employed to identify individual subjects' ERP(s) of interest. We validated our method with simulated data for ERP components N2 and P3, and real data from a visual oddball task to confirm the P3 component. Our findings revealed that estimated time windows for individual subjects provide precise ERP identification compared to fixed time windows across all subjects. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations with synthetic single-trial data demonstrated stable scores for the N2 and P3 components, confirming the reliability of our method. The proposed method enhances the examination of brain-evoked responses at the individual subject level by considering single-trial EEG data, thereby extracting mutual information relevant to the neural process. This approach offers a significant improvement over conventional ERP analysis, which relies on the averaging mechanism and fixed measurement interval.</p>","PeriodicalId":55329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Topography","volume":" ","pages":"1010-1032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Topography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-024-01074-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In event-related potential (ERP) analysis, it is commonly assumed that individual trials from a subject share similar properties and originate from comparable neural sources, allowing reliable interpretation of group-averages. Nevertheless, traditional group-level ERP analysis methods, including cluster analysis, often overlook critical information about individual subjects' neural processes due to using fixed measurement intervals derived from averaging. We developed a multi-set consensus clustering pipeline to examine cognitive processes at the individual subject level. Initially, consensus clustering from diverse methods was applied to single-trial EEG epochs of individual subjects. Subsequently, a second level of consensus clustering was performed across the trials of each subject. A newly modified time window determination method was then employed to identify individual subjects' ERP(s) of interest. We validated our method with simulated data for ERP components N2 and P3, and real data from a visual oddball task to confirm the P3 component. Our findings revealed that estimated time windows for individual subjects provide precise ERP identification compared to fixed time windows across all subjects. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations with synthetic single-trial data demonstrated stable scores for the N2 and P3 components, confirming the reliability of our method. The proposed method enhances the examination of brain-evoked responses at the individual subject level by considering single-trial EEG data, thereby extracting mutual information relevant to the neural process. This approach offers a significant improvement over conventional ERP analysis, which relies on the averaging mechanism and fixed measurement interval.

Abstract Image

利用多组共识聚类进行大脑诱发电位反应定性:实现单次脑电图分析。
在事件相关电位(ERP)分析中,通常假定一个受试者的单个试验具有相似的特性,并且来自可比的神经源,因此可以对群体平均值进行可靠的解释。然而,传统的组级ERP分析方法(包括聚类分析)由于使用由平均值得出的固定测量间隔,往往会忽略单个受试者神经过程的关键信息。我们开发了多组共识聚类管道,以研究单个受试者的认知过程。最初,我们将不同方法的共识聚类应用于单个受试者的单次脑电图。随后,对每个受试者的所有试验进行第二级共识聚类。然后采用新修改的时间窗确定方法来识别单个受试者感兴趣的 ERP。我们利用模拟数据对 ERP 成分 N2 和 P3 进行了验证,并利用视觉怪球任务的真实数据对 P3 成分进行了确认。我们的研究结果表明,与所有受试者的固定时间窗相比,单个受试者的估计时间窗能提供精确的 ERP 识别。此外,使用合成单次试验数据进行的蒙特卡罗模拟显示了 N2 和 P3 成分的稳定得分,证实了我们方法的可靠性。所提出的方法通过考虑单次脑电图数据,加强了对单个受试者脑诱发反应的检查,从而提取了与神经过程相关的相互信息。与依赖于平均机制和固定测量间隔的传统 ERP 分析相比,这种方法有了显著的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Topography
Brain Topography 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Brain Topography publishes clinical and basic research on cognitive neuroscience and functional neurophysiology using the full range of imaging techniques including EEG, MEG, fMRI, TMS, diffusion imaging, spectroscopy, intracranial recordings, lesion studies, and related methods. Submissions combining multiple techniques are particularly encouraged, as well as reports of new and innovative methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信