The impact of financial incentives on physical activity for employees in the context of workplace health promotion - A systematic review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Miriam Alice Vitzthum, Karsten Krüger, Christopher Weyh
{"title":"The impact of financial incentives on physical activity for employees in the context of workplace health promotion - A systematic review.","authors":"Miriam Alice Vitzthum, Karsten Krüger, Christopher Weyh","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiae048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The global increase in physical inactivity is progressively evolving into a significant health challenge. Alongside the promotion of more active leisure pursuits, elevating physical activity in the workplace has coming into focus. Financial incentives are not only a popular, but also promising tool in this regard. According to behavioral economics, they are able to initiate physical activity and thus create the basis for behavioral change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present systematic review was prepared according to the current PRISMA guidelines and with reference to the Cochrane Handbook. A systematic literature search of six electronic databases and three study registers was conducted to identify relevant literature. Both RCTs as well as non-RCTs were included. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the ROBINS-I Tool were used to assess the risk bias of individual studies, while the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for all studies related to physical activity outcomes. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included in the review. Among the total of 2,646 participants, the average age ranged from 35.5 to 43.3 years, and the percentage of women was between 48.6 and 88%. Risk of bias was rated as 'high' in three studies, 'moderate' in two, and 'low' in one. The quality of evidence was assessed as 'moderate'. Four of the six studies reported positive effects on physical activity during the incentive period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Workplace health promotion incorporating financial incentives have the potential to positively impact the physical activity levels of employees.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The global increase in physical inactivity is progressively evolving into a significant health challenge. Alongside the promotion of more active leisure pursuits, elevating physical activity in the workplace has coming into focus. Financial incentives are not only a popular, but also promising tool in this regard. According to behavioral economics, they are able to initiate physical activity and thus create the basis for behavioral change.

Methods: The present systematic review was prepared according to the current PRISMA guidelines and with reference to the Cochrane Handbook. A systematic literature search of six electronic databases and three study registers was conducted to identify relevant literature. Both RCTs as well as non-RCTs were included. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the ROBINS-I Tool were used to assess the risk bias of individual studies, while the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for all studies related to physical activity outcomes. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results: Six studies were included in the review. Among the total of 2,646 participants, the average age ranged from 35.5 to 43.3 years, and the percentage of women was between 48.6 and 88%. Risk of bias was rated as 'high' in three studies, 'moderate' in two, and 'low' in one. The quality of evidence was assessed as 'moderate'. Four of the six studies reported positive effects on physical activity during the incentive period.

Conclusion: Workplace health promotion incorporating financial incentives have the potential to positively impact the physical activity levels of employees.

在促进工作场所健康的背景下,经济激励对员工体育锻炼的影响--系统综述。
目的:全球缺乏体力活动的现象日益严重,这已逐渐演变成一项重大的健康挑战。在提倡更积极的休闲活动的同时,提高工作场所的体育锻炼水平也逐渐成为人们关注的焦点。在这方面,经济激励不仅是一种流行的工具,而且也是一种前景广阔的工具。根据行为经济学的观点,经济激励能够启动体育锻炼,从而为行为改变奠定基础:本系统综述是根据现行的 PRISMA 准则并参考 Cochrane 手册编写的。我们对六个电子数据库和三个研究登记册进行了系统性文献检索,以确定相关文献。既包括研究性试验,也包括非研究性试验。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和 ROBINS-I 工具评估各项研究的偏倚风险,同时采用 GRADE 方法评估所有与体育锻炼结果相关的研究的证据质量。研究还进行了叙述性综合:综述共纳入了六项研究。在总共 2646 名参与者中,平均年龄介于 35.5 岁至 43.3 岁之间,女性比例介于 48.6% 至 88% 之间。三项研究的偏倚风险被评为 "高",两项为 "中",一项为 "低"。证据质量被评定为 "中等"。六项研究中有四项报告了激励期间体育锻炼的积极效果:工作场所健康促进与经济激励相结合,有可能对员工的体育锻炼水平产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信