Characterizing barriers to care in migraine: multicountry results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes - International (CaMEO-I) study.

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michel Lanteri-Minet, Elizabeth Leroux, Zaza Katsarava, Richard B Lipton, Fumihiko Sakai, Manjit Matharu, Kristina Fanning, Aubrey Manack Adams, Katherine Sommer, Michael Seminerio, Dawn C Buse
{"title":"Characterizing barriers to care in migraine: multicountry results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes - International (CaMEO-I) study.","authors":"Michel Lanteri-Minet, Elizabeth Leroux, Zaza Katsarava, Richard B Lipton, Fumihiko Sakai, Manjit Matharu, Kristina Fanning, Aubrey Manack Adams, Katherine Sommer, Michael Seminerio, Dawn C Buse","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01834-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess rates of traversing barriers to care to access optimal clinical outcomes in people with migraine internationally.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>People in need of medical care for migraine should consult a health care professional knowledgeable in migraine management, obtain an accurate diagnosis, and receive an individualized treatment plan, which includes scientific society guideline-recommended treatments where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes-International (CaMEO-I) Study was a cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted from July 2021 through March 2022 in Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (US). Respondents who met modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine and had Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores of ≥ 6 (i.e., mild, moderate, or severe disability) were deemed to need medical care and were included in this analysis. Minimally effective treatment required that participants were currently consulting a health care professional for headache (barrier 1), reported an accurate diagnosis (barrier 2), and reported use of minimally appropriate pharmacologic treatment (barrier 3; based on American Headache Society 2021 Consensus Statement recommendations). Proportions of respondents who successfully traversed each barrier were calculated, and chi-square tests were used to assess overall difference among countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,492 respondents with migraine, 8,330 had MIDAS scores of ≥ 6, were deemed in need of medical care, and were included in this analysis. Current headache consultation was reported by 35.1% (2926/8330) of respondents. Compared with the US, consultation rates and diagnosis rates were statistically significantly lower in all other countries except France where they were statistically significantly higher. Total appropriate treatment rates were also statistically significantly lower in all other countries compared with the US except France, which did not differ from the US. All 3 barriers were traversed by only 11.5% (955/8330) of respondents, with differences among countries (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Of people with migraine in need of medical care for migraine, less than 15% traverse all 3 barriers to care. Although rates of consultation, diagnosis, and treatment differed among countries, improvements are needed in all countries studied to reduce the global burden of migraine.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01834-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess rates of traversing barriers to care to access optimal clinical outcomes in people with migraine internationally.

Background: People in need of medical care for migraine should consult a health care professional knowledgeable in migraine management, obtain an accurate diagnosis, and receive an individualized treatment plan, which includes scientific society guideline-recommended treatments where appropriate.

Methods: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes-International (CaMEO-I) Study was a cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted from July 2021 through March 2022 in Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (US). Respondents who met modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine and had Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores of ≥ 6 (i.e., mild, moderate, or severe disability) were deemed to need medical care and were included in this analysis. Minimally effective treatment required that participants were currently consulting a health care professional for headache (barrier 1), reported an accurate diagnosis (barrier 2), and reported use of minimally appropriate pharmacologic treatment (barrier 3; based on American Headache Society 2021 Consensus Statement recommendations). Proportions of respondents who successfully traversed each barrier were calculated, and chi-square tests were used to assess overall difference among countries.

Results: Among 14,492 respondents with migraine, 8,330 had MIDAS scores of ≥ 6, were deemed in need of medical care, and were included in this analysis. Current headache consultation was reported by 35.1% (2926/8330) of respondents. Compared with the US, consultation rates and diagnosis rates were statistically significantly lower in all other countries except France where they were statistically significantly higher. Total appropriate treatment rates were also statistically significantly lower in all other countries compared with the US except France, which did not differ from the US. All 3 barriers were traversed by only 11.5% (955/8330) of respondents, with differences among countries (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Of people with migraine in need of medical care for migraine, less than 15% traverse all 3 barriers to care. Although rates of consultation, diagnosis, and treatment differed among countries, improvements are needed in all countries studied to reduce the global burden of migraine.

Trial registration: NA.

偏头痛治疗障碍的特征:慢性偏头痛流行病学和结果--国际(CaMEO-I)研究的多国结果。
摘要评估国际上偏头痛患者为获得最佳临床疗效而跨越医疗障碍的比率:背景:因偏头痛而需要就医的患者应咨询具有偏头痛管理知识的专业医护人员,获得准确诊断,并接受个性化治疗方案,其中应酌情包括科学协会指南推荐的治疗方法:慢性偏头痛流行病学和结果国际(CaMEO-I)研究是一项横断面网络调查,于2021年7月至2022年3月在加拿大、法国、德国、日本、英国和美国进行。受访者如果符合经修订的《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版的偏头痛标准,且偏头痛残疾评估量表(MIDAS)评分≥6(即轻度、中度或重度残疾),则被视为需要接受医疗护理,并纳入本次分析。最低有效治疗要求受试者目前正在就头痛问题向专业医护人员咨询(障碍 1),报告了准确的诊断(障碍 2),并报告使用了最低限度的适当药物治疗(障碍 3;基于美国头痛协会 2021 共识声明建议)。我们计算了成功跨越每个障碍的受访者比例,并使用卡方检验来评估各国之间的总体差异:在14492名患有偏头痛的受访者中,8330人的MIDAS评分≥6分,被认为需要医疗护理,并被纳入本次分析。35.1%的受访者(2926/8330)表示目前曾就诊过头痛。与美国相比,除法国的就诊率和诊断率明显较高外,其他所有国家的就诊率和诊断率在统计学上都明显较低。与美国相比,除法国与美国无差异外,其他所有国家的总适当治疗率在统计学上也明显偏低。只有11.5%的受访者(955/8330)跨越了所有3个障碍,各国之间存在差异(P结论):在需要接受偏头痛医疗护理的偏头痛患者中,只有不到15%的人能够跨越所有3个护理障碍。尽管各国的就诊率、诊断率和治疗率不尽相同,但所有被研究的国家都需要做出改进,以减轻偏头痛给全球带来的负担:不详。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信