Analysis of 132 submandibular salivary glands using the Randox Evidence Investigator and Randox DOA ULTRA WB array.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jessica L Adamczyk, Joseph A Prahlow, Roberta Grieger-Nimmo, Rajeswari Kundu, Prentiss Jones
{"title":"Analysis of 132 submandibular salivary glands using the Randox Evidence Investigator and Randox DOA ULTRA WB array.","authors":"Jessica L Adamczyk, Joseph A Prahlow, Roberta Grieger-Nimmo, Rajeswari Kundu, Prentiss Jones","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occasionally, obtaining an adequate or acceptable postmortem blood specimen for drug analysis is not possible due to factors such as decomposition, exsanguination, or embalming. Submandibular salivary gland tissue, one of three major types of salivary gland tissue in the oral cavity of humans, has been reported to be a viable alternative postmortem specimen for toxicological testing. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Randox Evidence Investigator instrument and Randox DOA (Drugs of Abuse) Ultra Whole Blood Array for the semi-quantitative determination of 21 immunoassays in an alternative matrix, submandibular salivary gland tissue. We analyzed 132 submandibular salivary gland tissue specimens and compared the generated results to concomitantly collected postmortem whole blood specimen results. Oxycodone 2, meprobamate, barbiturate, benzodiazepine assay 1, zolpidem, and buprenorphine all showed perfect agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 1.00) between the submandibular salivary gland tissue results and the postmortem whole blood results; dextromethorphan, fentanyl, benzoylecgonine, methamphetamine, tricyclic antidepressants, oxycodone 1, and opiate showed an almost perfect agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.81-0.99); methadone, generic opioids, and amphetamine exhibited substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.61-0.80). Tramadol demonstrated fair agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.41-0.60). The lowest measure of agreement was observed with cannabinoids, meeting criteria for slight agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.01-0.20). An application of the techniques described in this study could be implemented in postmortem toxicology laboratories as well as medical examiners offices to provide preliminary drugs of abuse test results that can be used to direct additional testing. This study highlights the successful integration of a novel specimen matrix and an \"off-label\" use of an established analytical technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"591-597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occasionally, obtaining an adequate or acceptable postmortem blood specimen for drug analysis is not possible due to factors such as decomposition, exsanguination, or embalming. Submandibular salivary gland tissue, one of three major types of salivary gland tissue in the oral cavity of humans, has been reported to be a viable alternative postmortem specimen for toxicological testing. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Randox Evidence Investigator instrument and Randox DOA (Drugs of Abuse) Ultra Whole Blood Array for the semi-quantitative determination of 21 immunoassays in an alternative matrix, submandibular salivary gland tissue. We analyzed 132 submandibular salivary gland tissue specimens and compared the generated results to concomitantly collected postmortem whole blood specimen results. Oxycodone 2, meprobamate, barbiturate, benzodiazepine assay 1, zolpidem, and buprenorphine all showed perfect agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 1.00) between the submandibular salivary gland tissue results and the postmortem whole blood results; dextromethorphan, fentanyl, benzoylecgonine, methamphetamine, tricyclic antidepressants, oxycodone 1, and opiate showed an almost perfect agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.81-0.99); methadone, generic opioids, and amphetamine exhibited substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.61-0.80). Tramadol demonstrated fair agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.41-0.60). The lowest measure of agreement was observed with cannabinoids, meeting criteria for slight agreement (Cohen's kappa score = 0.01-0.20). An application of the techniques described in this study could be implemented in postmortem toxicology laboratories as well as medical examiners offices to provide preliminary drugs of abuse test results that can be used to direct additional testing. This study highlights the successful integration of a novel specimen matrix and an "off-label" use of an established analytical technique.

使用 Randox Evidence Investigator 和 Randox DOA ULTRA WB 阵列分析 132 个下颌下腺唾液腺。
有时,由于尸体腐烂、出血或防腐等因素,无法获得足够或可接受的死后血液样本进行药物分析。颌下唾液腺组织是人类口腔中三种主要唾液腺组织之一,有报道称它是毒理学检测的一种可行的死后替代标本。在本研究中,我们评估了 Randox Evidence Investigator 仪器和 Randox DOA(滥用药物)超全血阵列在替代基质(颌下腺唾液腺组织)中对 21 种免疫测定进行半定量测定的性能。我们分析了 132 份颌下腺唾液腺组织标本,并将生成的结果与同时采集的尸检全血标本结果进行了比较。羟考酮 2、甲丙氨酯、巴比妥酸盐、苯并二氮杂卓化验 1、唑吡坦和丁丙诺啡均显示出颌下腺组织与全血标本结果完全一致(Cohen's Kappa Score = 1.00);右美沙芬、芬太尼、苯甲酰可待因、甲基苯丙胺、三环类抗抑郁药、羟考酮 1 和阿片类药物几乎完全一致(Cohen's Kappa Score = 0.81-0.99);美沙酮、普通阿片类药物和安非他明显示出基本一致(Cohen's Kappa Score = 0.61-0.80)。曲马多的一致性一般(Cohen's Kappa Score = 0.41-0.60)。大麻素的一致性最低,仅达到轻微一致的标准(Cohen's Kappa Score = 0.01-0.20)。本研究中描述的技术可应用于尸检毒理学实验室和法医办公室,以提供初步的滥用药物测试结果,并用于指导其他测试。本研究强调了新型标本基质与 "标签外 "使用成熟分析技术的成功结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信