Proposal of a revision scale of the degree of cohesion and tensile strength to aid in the diagnosis of the cohesive character in soils

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Proposal of a revision scale of the degree of cohesion and tensile strength to aid in the diagnosis of the cohesive character in soils","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to establish reference values for tensile strength (TS) to aid the diagnosis of the cohesive character of soils. The hypotheses were: i) the subjectivity leads to variability in the human perception in the qualitative assessment of the cohesive character; ii) it is possible to develop a TS scale that aids in the quantification and diagnosis of the cohesive character. Three evaluators measured the aggregates/clods’ tensile strength using TS-Soil equipment. An electronic dynamometer was used as a control group, using a completely randomized design. The data were analyzed using statistical tests and regression analysis. Additionally, the values assigned in the qualitative evaluation of consistency by the evaluators were related to the tensile strength data. When comparing the means of the evaluators, who used the TS-Soil equipment to quantify the TS of aggregates/clods, with the electronic dynamometer (standard equipment) using the Dunnett test, no significant differences were found in 70 % of the comparisons for horizons with cohesive character and 57 % for horizons without cohesive character. The threshold for diagnosing the cohesive character was set at a TS value 66 kPa (very hard consistency). A significant number of scores were associated with hard consistency (40≤ TS<sub>kPa</sub> &lt;66). The study concluded that there is variability in the qualitative assessment of cohesive character and that a TS scale can be useful in quantification and diagnosis. Furthermore, it highlighted the importance of considering a moderate degree of cohesion in taxonomic systems when diagnosing cohesive character. The academic contribution of this study materializes as soil taxonomic systems begin to incorporate quantitative criteria in the diagnosis of cohesive character in soils. As for practical applications, the use of the cohesion degree scale allows the pedologist to recognize the cohesive character in soils more assertively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224004818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to establish reference values for tensile strength (TS) to aid the diagnosis of the cohesive character of soils. The hypotheses were: i) the subjectivity leads to variability in the human perception in the qualitative assessment of the cohesive character; ii) it is possible to develop a TS scale that aids in the quantification and diagnosis of the cohesive character. Three evaluators measured the aggregates/clods’ tensile strength using TS-Soil equipment. An electronic dynamometer was used as a control group, using a completely randomized design. The data were analyzed using statistical tests and regression analysis. Additionally, the values assigned in the qualitative evaluation of consistency by the evaluators were related to the tensile strength data. When comparing the means of the evaluators, who used the TS-Soil equipment to quantify the TS of aggregates/clods, with the electronic dynamometer (standard equipment) using the Dunnett test, no significant differences were found in 70 % of the comparisons for horizons with cohesive character and 57 % for horizons without cohesive character. The threshold for diagnosing the cohesive character was set at a TS value 66 kPa (very hard consistency). A significant number of scores were associated with hard consistency (40≤ TSkPa <66). The study concluded that there is variability in the qualitative assessment of cohesive character and that a TS scale can be useful in quantification and diagnosis. Furthermore, it highlighted the importance of considering a moderate degree of cohesion in taxonomic systems when diagnosing cohesive character. The academic contribution of this study materializes as soil taxonomic systems begin to incorporate quantitative criteria in the diagnosis of cohesive character in soils. As for practical applications, the use of the cohesion degree scale allows the pedologist to recognize the cohesive character in soils more assertively.

建议修订内聚力和抗拉强度等级,以帮助诊断土壤的内聚力特征
本研究旨在确定抗拉强度(TS)的参考值,以帮助诊断土壤的内聚特征。假设是:i) 主观性导致人类对内聚特征定性评估的感知存在差异;ii) 有可能制定一个有助于量化和诊断内聚特征的 TS 量表。三名评估人员使用 TS-Soil 设备测量了集料/泥块的抗拉强度。对照组使用电子测力计,采用完全随机设计。使用统计测试和回归分析对数据进行了分析。此外,评估人员对一致性的定性评估值也与抗拉强度数据相关。评估人员使用 TS-Soil 设备对集料/土块的 TS 进行量化,他们的平均值与电子测力计(标准设备)的平均值使用邓尼特试验进行比较,结果发现,在 70% 的比较中,有内聚特征的地层没有显著差异,在 57% 的比较中,无内聚特征的地层也没有显著差异。诊断内聚特征的临界值设定为 TS 值 66 kPa(极硬稠度)。相当多的分数与硬稠度有关(40≤ TSkPa <66)。研究得出的结论是,内聚特征的定性评估存在差异,TS 量表可用于量化和诊断。此外,该研究还强调了在诊断内聚特征时考虑分类系统中适度内聚的重要性。随着土壤分类系统开始将定量标准纳入土壤内聚特征的诊断,这项研究的学术贡献也就具体化了。在实际应用方面,内聚程度标度的使用可使土壤学家更自信地识别土壤的内聚特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信