An App Platform-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Outpatients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Jessie Gu, Peijin Wang, Shein-Chung Chow, Katelyn Dempsey, Santos Bermejo, Aparna Swaminathan, Alyssa Soskis, Julie Fried, Chad Kloefkorn, Christopher Jones, Christopher E Cox
{"title":"An App Platform-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Outpatients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Pilot Randomized Trial.","authors":"Jessie Gu, Peijin Wang, Shein-Chung Chow, Katelyn Dempsey, Santos Bermejo, Aparna Swaminathan, Alyssa Soskis, Julie Fried, Chad Kloefkorn, Christopher Jones, Christopher E Cox","doi":"10.1177/10499091241275966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Outpatients with interstitial lung disease often experience serious symptoms, yet infrequently receive palliative care. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the feasibility and clinical impact of a mobile application (PCplanner) in an outpatient setting. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial among adults with interstitial lung disease in a single-center academic clinic. Clinical outcomes included change in Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST) scale between baseline and 3 months as well as frequency of advance care planning discussions and referrals to palliative care services. <b>Results:</b> Observed feasibility outcomes were similar to targeted benchmarks including randomization rates (82.1% vs 80%) and retention (84.8% vs 80%). Mean NEST scores between the intervention and control group were 38.9 (SD, 18.9) vs 41.5 (SD, 20.5) at baseline, 34.6 (SD, 18.9) vs 33.6 (SD, 19.4) at 1 month after clinic visit, 40.5 (SD, 21.6) vs 35.3 (SD, 25.0) at 3 months after clinic visit. Changes in NEST scores between baseline and 3 months showed no difference in the primary outcome (<i>P</i> = 0.481, 95% CI [-8.45, 17.62]). <b>Conclusion:</b> Among patients with interstitial lung disease, a mobile app designed to focus patients and clinicians on palliative care principles demonstrated evidence of feasibility. Although changes in self-reported needs were similar between intervention and control groups, more patients in the intervention group updated their advance directives and code status compared to the control group. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner) NCT05095363. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05095363.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241275966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Outpatients with interstitial lung disease often experience serious symptoms, yet infrequently receive palliative care. Objective: To determine the feasibility and clinical impact of a mobile application (PCplanner) in an outpatient setting. Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial among adults with interstitial lung disease in a single-center academic clinic. Clinical outcomes included change in Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST) scale between baseline and 3 months as well as frequency of advance care planning discussions and referrals to palliative care services. Results: Observed feasibility outcomes were similar to targeted benchmarks including randomization rates (82.1% vs 80%) and retention (84.8% vs 80%). Mean NEST scores between the intervention and control group were 38.9 (SD, 18.9) vs 41.5 (SD, 20.5) at baseline, 34.6 (SD, 18.9) vs 33.6 (SD, 19.4) at 1 month after clinic visit, 40.5 (SD, 21.6) vs 35.3 (SD, 25.0) at 3 months after clinic visit. Changes in NEST scores between baseline and 3 months showed no difference in the primary outcome (P = 0.481, 95% CI [-8.45, 17.62]). Conclusion: Among patients with interstitial lung disease, a mobile app designed to focus patients and clinicians on palliative care principles demonstrated evidence of feasibility. Although changes in self-reported needs were similar between intervention and control groups, more patients in the intervention group updated their advance directives and code status compared to the control group. Clinical Trial Registration: Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner) NCT05095363. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05095363.

针对间质性肺病门诊患者的应用平台促进型姑息治疗协作干预:试点随机试验。
理由:患有间质性肺病的门诊病人通常会出现严重症状,但却很少接受姑息治疗。目的:确定移动应用(PCplanner)在门诊的可行性和临床影响:确定移动应用(PCplanner)在门诊环境中的可行性和临床影响。方法我们在一家单中心学术诊所的成人间质性肺病患者中开展了一项试点随机对照试验。临床结果包括生命末期筛查工具(NEST)量表在基线和 3 个月之间的变化,以及预先护理计划讨论和转诊至姑息治疗服务的频率。结果观察到的可行性结果与目标基准相似,包括随机率(82.1% vs 80%)和保留率(84.8% vs 80%)。干预组和对照组的平均 NEST 分数分别为:基线时 38.9(标度,18.9)vs 41.5(标度,20.5);门诊后 1 个月时 34.6(标度,18.9)vs 33.6(标度,19.4);门诊后 3 个月时 40.5(标度,21.6)vs 35.3(标度,25.0)。基线和 3 个月之间 NEST 分数的变化在主要结果上没有差异(P = 0.481,95% CI [-8.45, 17.62])。结论在间质性肺病患者中,一款旨在让患者和临床医生关注姑息关怀原则的手机应用证明了其可行性。虽然干预组和对照组在自我报告需求方面的变化相似,但与对照组相比,干预组中有更多患者更新了他们的预嘱和代码状态。临床试验注册:姑息治疗规划师(PCplanner)NCT05095363。https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05095363。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信