Anki flashcards: Spaced repetition learning in the undergraduate medical pharmacology curriculum

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1111/tct.13798
Juliana Magro, So-Young Oh, Nikola Košćica, Michael Poles
{"title":"Anki flashcards: Spaced repetition learning in the undergraduate medical pharmacology curriculum","authors":"Juliana Magro,&nbsp;So-Young Oh,&nbsp;Nikola Košćica,&nbsp;Michael Poles","doi":"10.1111/tct.13798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Teaching clinical pharmacology is often a challenge for medical schools. The benefits and popularity of active recall and spaced repetition through Anki flashcards are well-established and can offer a solution for teaching complex topics, but educators are often unfamiliar with this resource.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>We implemented 501 faculty-generated pharmacology flashcards in five modules across the medical preclinical curriculum, available to 104 first-year students. At the end of each module, students were surveyed on the usefulness of this novel resource. The data from the cohort who had access to flashcards was compared with the previous cohort, without access, to analyse whether student use of Anki flashcards changed students' perceptions of the pharmacology curriculum and whether there were changes in pharmacology exam performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-five percent of the respondents rated the Anki pharmacology flashcards as ‘very useful’ or ‘somewhat useful’. Eight hundred and seventy-five responses were analysed with a natural language processing algorithm, showing that fewer students mentioned pharmacology as a difficult topic in the cardiovascular and renal modules, compared with the cohort who did not use Anki flashcards. There was not a statistically significant difference in test scores between the cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Anki flashcards were well-received by medical students, which might have impacted their perception of the curriculum, as evidenced by the decrease in mentions of pharmacology being a difficult topic, maintaining consistency in academic performance. Educators should consider providing flashcards to offer spaced repetition opportunities in the curriculum; an additional benefit could be increasing information equality in medical schools.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Teaching clinical pharmacology is often a challenge for medical schools. The benefits and popularity of active recall and spaced repetition through Anki flashcards are well-established and can offer a solution for teaching complex topics, but educators are often unfamiliar with this resource.

Approach

We implemented 501 faculty-generated pharmacology flashcards in five modules across the medical preclinical curriculum, available to 104 first-year students. At the end of each module, students were surveyed on the usefulness of this novel resource. The data from the cohort who had access to flashcards was compared with the previous cohort, without access, to analyse whether student use of Anki flashcards changed students' perceptions of the pharmacology curriculum and whether there were changes in pharmacology exam performance.

Evaluation

Seventy-five percent of the respondents rated the Anki pharmacology flashcards as ‘very useful’ or ‘somewhat useful’. Eight hundred and seventy-five responses were analysed with a natural language processing algorithm, showing that fewer students mentioned pharmacology as a difficult topic in the cardiovascular and renal modules, compared with the cohort who did not use Anki flashcards. There was not a statistically significant difference in test scores between the cohorts.

Implications

Anki flashcards were well-received by medical students, which might have impacted their perception of the curriculum, as evidenced by the decrease in mentions of pharmacology being a difficult topic, maintaining consistency in academic performance. Educators should consider providing flashcards to offer spaced repetition opportunities in the curriculum; an additional benefit could be increasing information equality in medical schools.

Anki 闪存卡:医学药理学本科课程中的间隔重复学习。
背景:临床药理学教学通常是医学院面临的一项挑战。通过 Anki 闪存卡进行主动回忆和间隔重复的好处和受欢迎程度已得到证实,可为复杂课题的教学提供解决方案,但教育工作者往往不熟悉这一资源:我们在医学临床前课程的五个模块中使用了 501 张教师制作的药理学闪卡,供 104 名一年级学生使用。每个模块结束时,我们都会就这一新颖资源的实用性对学生进行调查。将使用闪存卡的学生的数据与未使用闪存卡的前一届学生的数据进行比较,分析学生使用Anki闪存卡是否改变了他们对药理学课程的看法,以及药理学考试成绩是否发生了变化:75%的受访者将 Anki 药理学卡片评为 "非常有用 "或 "比较有用"。使用自然语言处理算法分析了875份答复,结果显示,与未使用Anki教学卡片的学生相比,在心血管和肾脏模块中提到药理学是难点的学生人数减少了。两组学生的考试成绩在统计学上没有显著差异:启示:Anki 闪存卡深受医学生欢迎,这可能会影响他们对课程的感知,这一点可以从提及药理学是难点的次数减少、学习成绩保持一致得到证明。教育工作者应考虑在课程中提供闪存卡,以提供间隔重复的机会;这样做的另一个好处是可以提高医学院的信息平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信