Effect of treatment for early gestational diabetes mellitus on neonatal respiratory distress: A secondary analysis of the TOBOGM study.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
David Simmons, Jincy Immanuel, William M Hague, Suzette Coat, Helena Teede, Christopher J Nolan, Michael J Peek, Jeff R Flack, Mark McLean, Vincent W Wong, Emily J Hibbert, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Jürgen Harreiter, Helena Backman, Emily Gianatti, Arianne Sweeting, Viswanathan Mohan, N Wah Cheung
{"title":"Effect of treatment for early gestational diabetes mellitus on neonatal respiratory distress: A secondary analysis of the TOBOGM study.","authors":"David Simmons, Jincy Immanuel, William M Hague, Suzette Coat, Helena Teede, Christopher J Nolan, Michael J Peek, Jeff R Flack, Mark McLean, Vincent W Wong, Emily J Hibbert, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Jürgen Harreiter, Helena Backman, Emily Gianatti, Arianne Sweeting, Viswanathan Mohan, N Wah Cheung","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify factors associated with neonatal respiratory distress (NRD) in early Gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nested case-control analysis of the TOBOGM trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventeen hospitals: Australia, Sweden, Austria and India.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Pregnant women, <20 weeks' gestation, singleton, GDM risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women with GDM risk factors completed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before 20 weeks: those with eGDM (WHO-2013 criteria) were randomised to immediate or deferred GDM treatment. Logistic regression compared pregnancies with/without NRD, and in pregnancies with NRD, those with/without high-dependency nursery admission for ≤24 h with those admitted for >24 h. Comparisons were adjusted for age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, ethnicity, smoking, primigravity, education and site. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) are reported.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>NRD definition: ≥4 h of respiratory support (supplemental oxygen or supported ventilation) postpartum. Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS): Supported ventilation and ≥24 h nursery stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine (12.5%) of 793 infants had NRD; incidence halved (0.50, 0.31-0.79) if GDM treatment was started early. NRD was associated with Caesarean section (2.31, 1.42-3.76), large for gestational age (LGA) (1.83, 1.09-3.08) and shorter gestation (0.95, 0.93-0.97 per day longer). Among NRD infants, >24 h nursery-stay was associated with higher OGTT 1-h glucose (1.38, 1.08-1.76 per mmol/L). Fifteen (2.0%) infants had RDS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identifying and treating eGDM reduces NRD risk. NRD is more likely with Caesarean section, LGA and shorter gestation. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms behind this eGDM complication and any long-term effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors associated with neonatal respiratory distress (NRD) in early Gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM).

Design: Nested case-control analysis of the TOBOGM trial.

Setting: Seventeen hospitals: Australia, Sweden, Austria and India.

Population: Pregnant women, <20 weeks' gestation, singleton, GDM risk factors.

Methods: Women with GDM risk factors completed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before 20 weeks: those with eGDM (WHO-2013 criteria) were randomised to immediate or deferred GDM treatment. Logistic regression compared pregnancies with/without NRD, and in pregnancies with NRD, those with/without high-dependency nursery admission for ≤24 h with those admitted for >24 h. Comparisons were adjusted for age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, ethnicity, smoking, primigravity, education and site. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) are reported.

Main outcome measures: NRD definition: ≥4 h of respiratory support (supplemental oxygen or supported ventilation) postpartum. Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS): Supported ventilation and ≥24 h nursery stay.

Results: Ninety-nine (12.5%) of 793 infants had NRD; incidence halved (0.50, 0.31-0.79) if GDM treatment was started early. NRD was associated with Caesarean section (2.31, 1.42-3.76), large for gestational age (LGA) (1.83, 1.09-3.08) and shorter gestation (0.95, 0.93-0.97 per day longer). Among NRD infants, >24 h nursery-stay was associated with higher OGTT 1-h glucose (1.38, 1.08-1.76 per mmol/L). Fifteen (2.0%) infants had RDS.

Conclusions: Identifying and treating eGDM reduces NRD risk. NRD is more likely with Caesarean section, LGA and shorter gestation. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms behind this eGDM complication and any long-term effects.

早期妊娠糖尿病治疗对新生儿呼吸窘迫的影响:TOBOGM 研究的二次分析。
目的确定与早期妊娠糖尿病(eGDM)新生儿呼吸窘迫(NRD)相关的因素:设计:TOBOGM 试验的嵌套病例对照分析:17家医院人群: 孕妇:孕妇有 GDM 危险因素的妇女在 20 周前完成口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT):有 eGDM(WHO-2013 标准)的妇女被随机分配到立即或推迟 GDM 治疗。逻辑回归比较了有/无 NRD 的孕妇,以及在有 NRD 的孕妇中,有/无入托时间≤24 小时与入托时间>24 小时的孕妇。报告了调整后的几率比(95% CI):NRD 定义:产后呼吸支持(补充氧气或支持通气)≥4 小时。呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS):支持通气且在育婴室停留≥24小时:结果:793 名婴儿中有 99 名(12.5%)患有 NRD;如果及早开始治疗 GDM,发病率将减半(0.50, 0.31-0.79)。NRD与剖腹产(2.31,1.42-3.76)、胎龄偏大(LGA)(1.83,1.09-3.08)和妊娠期缩短(0.95,每天延长0.93-0.97)有关。在 NRD 婴儿中,护理时间超过 24 小时与 OGTT 1 小时血糖较高有关(1.38,1.08-1.76/mmol/L)。15名婴儿(2.0%)患有RDS:结论:识别并治疗 eGDM 可降低 NRD 风险。结论:识别并治疗 eGDM 可降低 NRD 风险。剖腹产、LGA 和较短的妊娠期更易发生 NRD。需要进一步研究以了解 eGDM 并发症背后的机制及其长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信