A task-dependent analysis of closed vs. open and fine vs. gross motor skills in handedness.

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Laterality Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2024.2391793
Alexandre J Marcori, Matheus G Gamberini, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Pedro H M Monteiro, Victor H A Okazaki
{"title":"A task-dependent analysis of closed vs. open and fine vs. gross motor skills in handedness.","authors":"Alexandre J Marcori, Matheus G Gamberini, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Pedro H M Monteiro, Victor H A Okazaki","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2024.2391793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The traditional classifications of motor skills nature (open vs closed; fine vs gross) have not been considered in handedness investigations. Instead, previous research focused on comparing complex vs less complex motor behaviour, leaving a gap in the literature. We compared manual preference between different motor skill characteristics, namely: fine and closed (FC), gross and closed (GC) and gross and open (GO) tasks. The hand preference was assessed with the Global Lateral Preference Inventory in four hundred and forty participants (244 women) aged from 18 to 59 years old. By assessing the degree and direction of handedness in different motor skills, our results showed a stronger lateralization pattern for FC motor skills as compared to GC and GO, with GO also being less lateralized than GC. Our results expand those of previous investigations that used the motor skill complexity definitions by showing how handedness can also be modulated by the interaction between classic motor skills classifications. Future research should consider fine vs. gross and open vs. closed classifications when selecting tasks for analysis of asymmetries of preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":" ","pages":"380-395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2024.2391793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional classifications of motor skills nature (open vs closed; fine vs gross) have not been considered in handedness investigations. Instead, previous research focused on comparing complex vs less complex motor behaviour, leaving a gap in the literature. We compared manual preference between different motor skill characteristics, namely: fine and closed (FC), gross and closed (GC) and gross and open (GO) tasks. The hand preference was assessed with the Global Lateral Preference Inventory in four hundred and forty participants (244 women) aged from 18 to 59 years old. By assessing the degree and direction of handedness in different motor skills, our results showed a stronger lateralization pattern for FC motor skills as compared to GC and GO, with GO also being less lateralized than GC. Our results expand those of previous investigations that used the motor skill complexity definitions by showing how handedness can also be modulated by the interaction between classic motor skills classifications. Future research should consider fine vs. gross and open vs. closed classifications when selecting tasks for analysis of asymmetries of preference.

对封闭式与开放式、精细运动技能与粗大运动技能在手部灵活性方面的任务依赖性分析。
传统的运动技能性质分类(开放式与封闭式;精细与粗略)在手性调查中并未被考虑。相反,以往的研究侧重于比较复杂与不太复杂的运动行为,这在文献中留下了空白。我们比较了不同运动技能特征之间的手部偏好,即:精细和封闭(FC)、粗大和封闭(GC)以及粗大和开放(GO)任务。我们使用全球侧向偏好量表对 44 名参与者(244 名女性)的手部偏好进行了评估,这些参与者的年龄在 18 至 59 岁之间。通过评估不同运动技能中手的偏向程度和方向,我们的结果显示,FC 运动技能的偏侧模式强于 GC 和 GO,GO 的偏侧程度也低于 GC。我们的研究结果拓展了之前使用运动技能复杂性定义的研究,显示了手性也可以通过经典运动技能分类之间的相互作用来调节。未来的研究在选择任务进行偏好不对称分析时,应考虑精细与粗略、开放与封闭的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laterality
Laterality Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信