Testing rurality as a moderator of associations between masculinity constructs, help-seeking, and firearm storage practices.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
William Grunewald, Sydney N Waitz-Kudla, Samantha E Daruwala, April R Smith, Michael D Anestis
{"title":"Testing rurality as a moderator of associations between masculinity constructs, help-seeking, and firearm storage practices.","authors":"William Grunewald, Sydney N Waitz-Kudla, Samantha E Daruwala, April R Smith, Michael D Anestis","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-reliance, emotional control, and honor ideology may prevent help-seeking when suicidal ideation emerges. Furthermore, these factors are associated with an increased likelihood of firearm ownership and unsecure storage, which could facilitate suicide attempts. The rurality of residence may impact these associations, as rural regions report increased independence, honor culture, and firearm prevalence. Therefore, this study examined how emotional control, self-reliance, and honor ideology relate to firearm storage and help-seeking for suicidal ideation, with rurality moderating these associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 733 adults (63.6% female, 33.5% male, and 2.9% transgender/other) who reported past-month suicidal ideation. Analyses tested associations between emotional control, self-reliance, and honor ideology with help-seeking for suicidal ideation and firearm storage, with rurality moderating these associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The association of self-reliance and decreased help-seeking willingness for suicidal ideation was significant for those in non-urban areas. The association of emotional control and decreased help-seeking willingness for suicidal ideation was significant for those in urban areas. No variables predicted firearm storage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-reliance and emotional control could be barriers for help-seeking regardless of gender identity that depend on rurality. Clinicians may target emotional control/self-reliance via strengths-based approaches with an emphasis on when these constructs could be maladaptive, as this could promote help-seeking.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Self-reliance, emotional control, and honor ideology may prevent help-seeking when suicidal ideation emerges. Furthermore, these factors are associated with an increased likelihood of firearm ownership and unsecure storage, which could facilitate suicide attempts. The rurality of residence may impact these associations, as rural regions report increased independence, honor culture, and firearm prevalence. Therefore, this study examined how emotional control, self-reliance, and honor ideology relate to firearm storage and help-seeking for suicidal ideation, with rurality moderating these associations.

Methods: Participants were 733 adults (63.6% female, 33.5% male, and 2.9% transgender/other) who reported past-month suicidal ideation. Analyses tested associations between emotional control, self-reliance, and honor ideology with help-seeking for suicidal ideation and firearm storage, with rurality moderating these associations.

Results: The association of self-reliance and decreased help-seeking willingness for suicidal ideation was significant for those in non-urban areas. The association of emotional control and decreased help-seeking willingness for suicidal ideation was significant for those in urban areas. No variables predicted firearm storage.

Conclusions: Self-reliance and emotional control could be barriers for help-seeking regardless of gender identity that depend on rurality. Clinicians may target emotional control/self-reliance via strengths-based approaches with an emphasis on when these constructs could be maladaptive, as this could promote help-seeking.

测试乡土性对男性气质、寻求帮助和枪支储存行为之间关联的调节作用。
简介当出现自杀意念时,自力更生、情绪控制和荣誉意识可能会阻碍寻求帮助。此外,这些因素还与拥有枪支和枪支存放不安全的可能性增加有关,这可能会助长自杀企图。居住地的农村地区可能会影响这些关联,因为农村地区的独立性、荣誉文化和枪支使用率都有所提高。因此,本研究探讨了情绪控制、自立和荣誉意识形态与枪支存放和自杀意念求助之间的关系,以及农村地区对这些关联的调节作用:参与者为 733 名成年人(63.6% 为女性,33.5% 为男性,2.9% 为变性人/其他人群),他们均报告在过去一个月中有自杀倾向。分析检验了情绪控制、自立和荣誉意识形态与自杀意念求助和枪支储藏之间的关联,而农村地区对这些关联起调节作用:对于非城市地区的人来说,自立与自杀意念求助意愿下降之间存在显著关联。在城市地区,情绪控制与自杀意念求助意愿下降之间的关联显著。没有任何变量可以预测枪支储存情况:结论:无论性别身份如何,自立和情绪控制都可能是阻碍求助的因素,这与城市地区有关。临床医生可以通过以优势为基础的方法,针对情绪控制/自我依赖进行治疗,重点关注这些结构何时可能出现适应不良,因为这可以促进求助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信