Transanal Intubation for Preventing Colorectal Anastomotic Failure.

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5562420
Mykola Gordiichuk
{"title":"Transanal Intubation for Preventing Colorectal Anastomotic Failure.","authors":"Mykola Gordiichuk","doi":"10.1155/2024/5562420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Failure of low colorectal anastomosis remains challenging in surgical oncology, necessitating the exploration of new methods and improvements in existing preventive measures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted in two stages: intraluminal pressure in the colon was monitored in 32 patients by manometry and sonography over a 5-day postoperative period; 213 patients who underwent anterior resection of the rectum were analyzed, of whom 126 and 87 underwent diverting stoma (DS) and transanal intubation (TAI), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effectiveness of the recommended technique for applying and removing transanal intubation (TAI) to prevent pneumo hydro strike (≥15 kPa) on the anastomosis line was analyzed in 87 patients and compared with imposed DS. TAI showed better borderline statistical significance (<i>p</i> = 0.051). The incidence of repeat surgery for anastomotic failure (AL) was seven (5.55%) and four (4.59%) in the DS and TAI groups, respectively. The distance of the anastomosis from the dentate line <60 mm was associated with a higher risk of AL occurrence (odds ratio (OR), 1.012; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.007-1.017; <i>p</i> < 0.001; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.82). DS is recommended for men, as the risk of AL is significantly lower among women (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.16-1.04; <i>p</i> = 0.062; AUC, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although TAI is advantageous over DS for preventing AL, surgeons select the method for the preventive approach based on the preoperative and intraoperative results.</p>","PeriodicalId":45960,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5562420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5562420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Failure of low colorectal anastomosis remains challenging in surgical oncology, necessitating the exploration of new methods and improvements in existing preventive measures.

Materials and methods: This prospective study was conducted in two stages: intraluminal pressure in the colon was monitored in 32 patients by manometry and sonography over a 5-day postoperative period; 213 patients who underwent anterior resection of the rectum were analyzed, of whom 126 and 87 underwent diverting stoma (DS) and transanal intubation (TAI), respectively.

Results: The effectiveness of the recommended technique for applying and removing transanal intubation (TAI) to prevent pneumo hydro strike (≥15 kPa) on the anastomosis line was analyzed in 87 patients and compared with imposed DS. TAI showed better borderline statistical significance (p = 0.051). The incidence of repeat surgery for anastomotic failure (AL) was seven (5.55%) and four (4.59%) in the DS and TAI groups, respectively. The distance of the anastomosis from the dentate line <60 mm was associated with a higher risk of AL occurrence (odds ratio (OR), 1.012; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.007-1.017; p < 0.001; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.82). DS is recommended for men, as the risk of AL is significantly lower among women (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.16-1.04; p = 0.062; AUC, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.67).

Conclusions: Although TAI is advantageous over DS for preventing AL, surgeons select the method for the preventive approach based on the preoperative and intraoperative results.

经肛门插管预防大肠吻合失败
导言:低位结肠直肠吻合术失败仍然是肿瘤外科面临的挑战,因此有必要探索新的方法并改进现有的预防措施:这项前瞻性研究分两个阶段进行:在术后 5 天内通过测压计和超声波检查对 32 名患者的结肠腔内压力进行监测;对 213 名接受直肠前切除术的患者进行分析,其中 126 人和 87 人分别接受了分流造口(DS)和经肛插管(TAI)术:结果:分析了 87 例患者采用经肛门插管(TAI)和经肛门插管(DS)的效果,并将两者进行了比较。TAI显示出更好的边缘统计学意义(P = 0.051)。DS 组和 TAI 组因吻合失败(AL)而再次手术的发生率分别为 7 例(5.55%)和 4 例(4.59%)。吻合口与齿状线的距离 p < 0.001;曲线下面积 (AUC) = 0.82)。建议男性接受 DS,因为女性的 AL 风险明显较低(OR,0.41;95% CI,0.16-1.04;p = 0.062;AUC,0.61;95% CI,0.54-0.67):尽管TAI在预防AL方面比DS更有优势,但外科医生会根据术前和术中结果选择预防方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Surgical Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of surgical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信