Cold snare polypectomy: A closer look at the efficacy and limitations for polyps 10-20 mm in size.

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Louis A Chaptini, Sarah Jalloul, Karam Karam
{"title":"Cold snare polypectomy: A closer look at the efficacy and limitations for polyps 10-20 mm in size.","authors":"Louis A Chaptini, Sarah Jalloul, Karam Karam","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current guidelines recommend cold snare polypectomy for polyps less than 10 mm in size. Conversely, endoscopic mucosal resection is still the preferred technique for larger polyps. Concerns regarding cold snare polypectomy for larger polyps revolve around the difficulty in conducting <i>en-bloc</i> resection (resulting in piecemeal removal), and the potential for local residual polyp tissue and a high rate of recurrence. On the other hand, cold snare technique has the advantages of shortening procedure time, reducing delayed bleeding risks and lowering cost of treatment. Numerous ongoing and recent studies are focused on evaluating the risks and benefits of this technique for polyps larger than 10 mm, with the goal of providing clear guidelines in the near future. The aim of this editorial is to provide our readers with an overview regarding this subject and the latest developments surrounding it.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"16 8","pages":"445-450"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i8.445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend cold snare polypectomy for polyps less than 10 mm in size. Conversely, endoscopic mucosal resection is still the preferred technique for larger polyps. Concerns regarding cold snare polypectomy for larger polyps revolve around the difficulty in conducting en-bloc resection (resulting in piecemeal removal), and the potential for local residual polyp tissue and a high rate of recurrence. On the other hand, cold snare technique has the advantages of shortening procedure time, reducing delayed bleeding risks and lowering cost of treatment. Numerous ongoing and recent studies are focused on evaluating the risks and benefits of this technique for polyps larger than 10 mm, with the goal of providing clear guidelines in the near future. The aim of this editorial is to provide our readers with an overview regarding this subject and the latest developments surrounding it.

冷套管息肉切除术:仔细研究 10-20 毫米大小息肉的疗效和局限性。
目前的指南建议对大小小于 10 毫米的息肉采用冷套管息肉切除术。相反,对于较大的息肉,内窥镜粘膜切除术仍是首选技术。对较大息肉进行冷套法息肉切除术的顾虑主要集中在难以进行全切(导致零碎切除),以及息肉组织局部残留和复发率高的可能性。另一方面,冷套管技术具有缩短手术时间、减少延迟出血风险和降低治疗成本等优点。许多正在进行的研究和最新研究都在重点评估该技术对大于 10 毫米的息肉的风险和益处,目的是在不久的将来提供明确的指导原则。这篇社论的目的是向读者概述这一主题及其最新进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信