Jean-Luc K Kabangu, Momodou G Bah, Ene M Enogela, Suzanne E Judd, Joanna M Hobson, Emily B Levitan, Sonia V Eden
{"title":"The Association Between Experienced Discrimination and Pain in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.","authors":"Jean-Luc K Kabangu, Momodou G Bah, Ene M Enogela, Suzanne E Judd, Joanna M Hobson, Emily B Levitan, Sonia V Eden","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02130-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between experienced discrimination and its effects on pain interference and management among racial disparities is not well explored. This research investigated these associations among Black and White U.S. adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis involved 9369 Black and White adults in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS), assessing experiences of discrimination, pain interference (SF-12), and pain treatment, incorporating factors like demographics, comorbidities, and stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black participants experiencing moderate discrimination were found to have a 41% increased likelihood of pain interference (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.95), similaritythose facing high levels of discrimination also showed a 41% increase (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.86) compared to those without such experiences. White individuals reporting moderate discrimination also faced a heightened risk, with a 21% greater chance of pain interference (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.45). Notably, the presence of moderate discrimination among Black participants correlated with a 12% reduced probability of receiving pain treatment (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56-1.37). Furthermore, Black, and White individuals who reported discrimination when seeking employment had a 33% (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98) and 32% (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96) lower likelihood, respectively, of receiving treated pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study elucidates how discrimination exacerbates pain interference and restricts access to treatment, affecting Black and White individuals differently. These findings underscore an urgent need for strategies to counteract discrimination's negative effects on healthcare outcomes. Addressing these disparities is crucial for advancing health equity and improving the overall quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":"3269-3283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02130-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The relationship between experienced discrimination and its effects on pain interference and management among racial disparities is not well explored. This research investigated these associations among Black and White U.S. adults.
Methods: The analysis involved 9369 Black and White adults in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS), assessing experiences of discrimination, pain interference (SF-12), and pain treatment, incorporating factors like demographics, comorbidities, and stress.
Results: Black participants experiencing moderate discrimination were found to have a 41% increased likelihood of pain interference (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.95), similaritythose facing high levels of discrimination also showed a 41% increase (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.86) compared to those without such experiences. White individuals reporting moderate discrimination also faced a heightened risk, with a 21% greater chance of pain interference (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.45). Notably, the presence of moderate discrimination among Black participants correlated with a 12% reduced probability of receiving pain treatment (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56-1.37). Furthermore, Black, and White individuals who reported discrimination when seeking employment had a 33% (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98) and 32% (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96) lower likelihood, respectively, of receiving treated pain.
Conclusion: The study elucidates how discrimination exacerbates pain interference and restricts access to treatment, affecting Black and White individuals differently. These findings underscore an urgent need for strategies to counteract discrimination's negative effects on healthcare outcomes. Addressing these disparities is crucial for advancing health equity and improving the overall quality of care.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
