R Castro-López, C A López-Orona, J A Martínez-Gallardo, M A Tirado-Ramírez, G Gómez, W Rubio-Aragón, J A Edeza-Urias, M C Villa-Medina
{"title":"Field Applications of Fluorinated Nematicides for <i>Meloidogyne enterolobii</i> Management on Tomato.","authors":"R Castro-López, C A López-Orona, J A Martínez-Gallardo, M A Tirado-Ramírez, G Gómez, W Rubio-Aragón, J A Edeza-Urias, M C Villa-Medina","doi":"10.2478/jofnem-2024-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mexico is the 8<sup>th</sup> largest producer of tomatoes. <i>Meloidogyne enterolobii</i> is reported in Sinaloa, affecting tomato cultivars with genetic resistance to <i>Meloidogyne</i> spp. We aimed to evaluate field applications of fluopyram, fluensulfone, and fluazaindolizine treatments for managing <i>M. enterolobii</i> on tomatoes. Experiments were set on raised beds in a shade house. Nematicides were applied via drip irrigation. Under fluopyram treatment, <i>M. enterolobii</i> did not reduce the number of extra-large-size fruits. The number of large-size fruits with fluopyram and fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram treatments was also unaffected by <i>M. enterolobii</i>. Yield from the treatments fluopyram, fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, and fluensulfone plus fluopyram was similar to the control treatment without <i>M. enterolobii</i>. Finally, fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, fluopyram, and fluensulfone plus fluopyram treatments showed the highest reduction of root galling. We conclude that the fluopyram was more effective as an individual treatment. Pre-plant applications of fluensulfone and fluazaindolizine reduced the damage to the plant and the loss of yield; however, the complementary application of fluorinated nematicides improved the management of <i>M. enterolobii</i> in the tomato crop.</p>","PeriodicalId":16475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nematology","volume":"56 1","pages":"20240030"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nematology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2024-0030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mexico is the 8th largest producer of tomatoes. Meloidogyne enterolobii is reported in Sinaloa, affecting tomato cultivars with genetic resistance to Meloidogyne spp. We aimed to evaluate field applications of fluopyram, fluensulfone, and fluazaindolizine treatments for managing M. enterolobii on tomatoes. Experiments were set on raised beds in a shade house. Nematicides were applied via drip irrigation. Under fluopyram treatment, M. enterolobii did not reduce the number of extra-large-size fruits. The number of large-size fruits with fluopyram and fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram treatments was also unaffected by M. enterolobii. Yield from the treatments fluopyram, fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, and fluensulfone plus fluopyram was similar to the control treatment without M. enterolobii. Finally, fluazaindolizine plus fluopyram, fluopyram, and fluensulfone plus fluopyram treatments showed the highest reduction of root galling. We conclude that the fluopyram was more effective as an individual treatment. Pre-plant applications of fluensulfone and fluazaindolizine reduced the damage to the plant and the loss of yield; however, the complementary application of fluorinated nematicides improved the management of M. enterolobii in the tomato crop.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nematology is the official technical and scientific communication publication of the Society of Nematologists since 1969. The journal publishes original papers on all aspects of basic, applied, descriptive, theoretical or experimental nematology and adheres to strict peer-review policy. Other categories of papers include invited reviews, research notes, abstracts of papers presented at annual meetings, and special publications as appropriate.