Comparing Loneliness, Social Inactivity, and Social Isolation: Associations with Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality among Home-Dwelling Older Adults.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gerontology Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1159/000540345
Laura J Rautiainen, Anu H Jansson, Mia Knuutila, Ulla L Aalto, Annika Kolster, Hannu Kautiainen, Timo E Strandberg, Kaisu H Pitkala
{"title":"Comparing Loneliness, Social Inactivity, and Social Isolation: Associations with Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality among Home-Dwelling Older Adults.","authors":"Laura J Rautiainen, Anu H Jansson, Mia Knuutila, Ulla L Aalto, Annika Kolster, Hannu Kautiainen, Timo E Strandberg, Kaisu H Pitkala","doi":"10.1159/000540345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Loneliness, social inactivity, and social isolation are intertwined concepts. When assessed separately, they indicate poor well-being, adverse health effects, and increased mortality. Studies exploring overlapping and comparing the prognosis of these concepts are scarce. We investigated (1) overlapping of concepts of loneliness, social inactivity, and social isolation, (2) characteristics of groups: group 0 (not lonely, socially inactive, or socially isolated), group 1 (lonely), group 2 (not lonely but socially inactive and/or socially isolated), and (3) the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychological well-being (PWB), and 3.6-year mortality of these groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The home-dwelling older adults (n = 989; 75 y+) of the Helsinki Aging Study in 2019-2022 completing all required questionnaires were assessed. Group 0 included 494, group 1 included 280, and group 2 included 215 participants. Variables studied were demographics, diagnoses, mobility, physical functioning (Barthel index), and cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination). Outcomes were HRQoL (15D) and PWB. Mortality was retrieved from central registers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half of the sample was lonely, socially inactive, or socially isolated, but only 2% were simultaneously lonely, socially inactive, and socially isolated. Of lonely participants, 38% were also socially inactive and/or socially isolated. The lonely participants were significantly more often widowed or lived alone and had the lowest HRQoL and poorest PWB compared with the other groups. After adjustments (age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index), mortality did not statistically differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Loneliness is an independent determinant of poor HRQoL and PWB, and it should be considered separately from social inactivity and social isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Loneliness, social inactivity, and social isolation are intertwined concepts. When assessed separately, they indicate poor well-being, adverse health effects, and increased mortality. Studies exploring overlapping and comparing the prognosis of these concepts are scarce. We investigated (1) overlapping of concepts of loneliness, social inactivity, and social isolation, (2) characteristics of groups: group 0 (not lonely, socially inactive, or socially isolated), group 1 (lonely), group 2 (not lonely but socially inactive and/or socially isolated), and (3) the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychological well-being (PWB), and 3.6-year mortality of these groups.

Methods: The home-dwelling older adults (n = 989; 75 y+) of the Helsinki Aging Study in 2019-2022 completing all required questionnaires were assessed. Group 0 included 494, group 1 included 280, and group 2 included 215 participants. Variables studied were demographics, diagnoses, mobility, physical functioning (Barthel index), and cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination). Outcomes were HRQoL (15D) and PWB. Mortality was retrieved from central registers.

Results: Half of the sample was lonely, socially inactive, or socially isolated, but only 2% were simultaneously lonely, socially inactive, and socially isolated. Of lonely participants, 38% were also socially inactive and/or socially isolated. The lonely participants were significantly more often widowed or lived alone and had the lowest HRQoL and poorest PWB compared with the other groups. After adjustments (age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index), mortality did not statistically differ between the groups.

Conclusion: Loneliness is an independent determinant of poor HRQoL and PWB, and it should be considered separately from social inactivity and social isolation.

比较孤独、社交不活跃和社交孤立--与居家老年人与健康相关的生活质量和死亡率的关系。
导言孤独、缺乏社交活动和社会隔离是相互交织的概念。如果对它们分别进行评估,则会发现它们会带来不良的幸福感、不利的健康影响和更高的死亡率。探讨这些概念的重叠和比较其预后的研究很少。我们调查了:1)孤独、社交不活跃和社会隔离概念的重叠;2)各组的特征:3)这些群体的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、心理健康(PWB)和 3.6 年死亡率:对2019-2022年赫尔辛基老龄化研究中填写了所有必要问卷的居家老年人(n=989;75岁以上)进行了评估。0组包括494人,1组包括280人,2组包括215人。研究变量包括人口统计学、诊断、活动能力、身体功能(巴特尔指数)和认知能力(迷你精神状态检查)。研究结果包括 HRQoL (15D) 和 PWB。死亡率从中央登记册中获取:一半的样本是孤独、不活跃或与社会隔绝的,但只有 2% 的样本同时是孤独、不活跃和与社会隔绝的。在孤独的参与者中,38%的人同时也不活跃于社会和/或被社会孤立。与其他组别相比,孤独参与者中丧偶或独居者明显增多,其 HRQoL 最低,PWB 最差。经过调整(年龄、性别、Charlson合并症指数)后,各组之间的死亡率没有统计学差异:结论:孤独是导致不良 HRQoL 和 PWB 的一个独立决定因素,应将其与社交不活跃和社交孤立分开考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信