Diagnosing the status and trend of research on traditional knowledge related to non-timber forest products as food

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Suyeon Min , Eunsoo Kim , Pinky B. Dayandante , Mi Sun Park
{"title":"Diagnosing the status and trend of research on traditional knowledge related to non-timber forest products as food","authors":"Suyeon Min ,&nbsp;Eunsoo Kim ,&nbsp;Pinky B. Dayandante ,&nbsp;Mi Sun Park","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forest communities have a rich heritage of gathering, producing, and using non-timber forest products (NTFPs) as food. They have maintained and transferred traditional knowledge related to NTFPs through their networks over generations. Considering the food value of NTFPs, traditional knowledge has become an important social asset, and its functions in forest communities are clearly identifiable. This study systematically analyzed the research on traditional knowledge related to NTFPs as food—to demonstrate the status and trends of research in this regard—using a systematic review method and topic modeling. We found that studies predominantly focused on medicinal plants from Asian and African countries and their effect. Through topic modeling, research keywords were classified into six topics—namely, ethnomedicinal practices, biodiversity, measurement, community and food security, traditionality, and culture. This study's findings indicate three key messages—specifically, the dominance of traditional knowledge related to NTFPs as medicinal foods, a methodological gap in traditional knowledge research, and the contribution of ecosystem services of NTFPs to community sustainability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001535/pdfft?md5=b0a7d0ee6a0a83e9e6b53a3c2abc1f6f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001535-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest communities have a rich heritage of gathering, producing, and using non-timber forest products (NTFPs) as food. They have maintained and transferred traditional knowledge related to NTFPs through their networks over generations. Considering the food value of NTFPs, traditional knowledge has become an important social asset, and its functions in forest communities are clearly identifiable. This study systematically analyzed the research on traditional knowledge related to NTFPs as food—to demonstrate the status and trends of research in this regard—using a systematic review method and topic modeling. We found that studies predominantly focused on medicinal plants from Asian and African countries and their effect. Through topic modeling, research keywords were classified into six topics—namely, ethnomedicinal practices, biodiversity, measurement, community and food security, traditionality, and culture. This study's findings indicate three key messages—specifically, the dominance of traditional knowledge related to NTFPs as medicinal foods, a methodological gap in traditional knowledge research, and the contribution of ecosystem services of NTFPs to community sustainability.

分析与作为食物的非木材森林产品有关的传统知识的研究现状和趋势
森林社区拥有收集、生产和使用非木材森林产品 (NTFP) 作为食物的丰富传统。他们通过世代相传的网络,保持并传承着与非木材森林产品相关的传统知识。考虑到非木材森林产品的食用价值,传统知识已成为一种重要的社会资产,其在森林社区中的功能也清晰可见。本研究采用系统综述法和主题建模法,系统分析了与作为食物的 NTFPs 相关的传统知识研究,以展示这方面的研究现状和趋势。我们发现,研究主要集中于亚洲和非洲国家的药用植物及其功效。通过主题建模,研究关键词被分为六个主题--即民族药用实践、生物多样性、测量、社区和食品安全、传统和文化。研究结果表明了三个关键信息,即与作为药用食品的非物质文化遗产相关的传统知识的主导地位、传统知识研究方法上的差距以及非物质文化遗产的生态系统服务对社区可持续发展的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信