Mild (34 °C) versus moderate hypothermia (24 °C) in a swine model of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Alexandra M. Marquez , Marinos Kosmopoulos , Rajat Kalra , Tomaz Goslar , Deborah Jaeger , Christopher Gaisendrees , Alejandra Gutierrez , Gregory Carlisle , Tamas Alexy , Sergey Gurevich , Andrea M. Elliott , Marie E. Steiner , Jason A. Bartos , Davis Seelig , Demetris Yannopoulos
{"title":"Mild (34 °C) versus moderate hypothermia (24 °C) in a swine model of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation","authors":"Alexandra M. Marquez ,&nbsp;Marinos Kosmopoulos ,&nbsp;Rajat Kalra ,&nbsp;Tomaz Goslar ,&nbsp;Deborah Jaeger ,&nbsp;Christopher Gaisendrees ,&nbsp;Alejandra Gutierrez ,&nbsp;Gregory Carlisle ,&nbsp;Tamas Alexy ,&nbsp;Sergey Gurevich ,&nbsp;Andrea M. Elliott ,&nbsp;Marie E. Steiner ,&nbsp;Jason A. Bartos ,&nbsp;Davis Seelig ,&nbsp;Demetris Yannopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of hypothermia in post-arrest neuroprotection is controversial. Animal studies suggest potential benefits with lower temperatures, but high-fidelity ECPR models evaluating temperatures below 30 °C are lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether rapid cooling to 24 °C initiated upon reperfusion reduces brain injury compared to 34 °C in a swine model of ECPR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-four female pigs had electrically induced VF and mechanical CPR for 30 min. Animals were cannulated for VA-ECMO and cooled to either 34 °C for 4 h (n = 8), 24 °C for 1 h with rewarming to 34 °C over 3 h (n = 7), or 24 °C for 4 h without rewarming (n = 9). Cooling was initiated upon VA-ECMO reperfusion by circulating ice water through the oxygenator. Brain temperature and cerebral and systemic hemodynamics were continuously monitored. After four hours on VA-ECMO, brain tissue was obtained for examination.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Target brain temperature was achieved within 30 min of reperfusion (p = 0.74). Carotid blood flow was higher in the 24 °C without rewarming group throughout the VA-ECMO period compared to 34 °C and 24 °C with rewarming (p &lt; 0.001). Vasopressin requirement was higher in animals treated with 24 °C without rewarming (p = 0.07). Compared to 34 °C, animals treated with 24 °C with rewarming were less coagulopathic and had less immunohistochemistry-detected neurologic injury. There were no differences in global brain injury score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite improvement in carotid blood flow and immunohistochemistry detected neurologic injury, reperfusion at 24 °C with or without rewarming did not reduce early global brain injury compared to 34 °C in a swine model of ECPR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001966/pdfft?md5=44204b55454ac66988872d108a2f545d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001966-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The role of hypothermia in post-arrest neuroprotection is controversial. Animal studies suggest potential benefits with lower temperatures, but high-fidelity ECPR models evaluating temperatures below 30 °C are lacking.

Objectives

To determine whether rapid cooling to 24 °C initiated upon reperfusion reduces brain injury compared to 34 °C in a swine model of ECPR.

Methods

Twenty-four female pigs had electrically induced VF and mechanical CPR for 30 min. Animals were cannulated for VA-ECMO and cooled to either 34 °C for 4 h (n = 8), 24 °C for 1 h with rewarming to 34 °C over 3 h (n = 7), or 24 °C for 4 h without rewarming (n = 9). Cooling was initiated upon VA-ECMO reperfusion by circulating ice water through the oxygenator. Brain temperature and cerebral and systemic hemodynamics were continuously monitored. After four hours on VA-ECMO, brain tissue was obtained for examination.

Results

Target brain temperature was achieved within 30 min of reperfusion (p = 0.74). Carotid blood flow was higher in the 24 °C without rewarming group throughout the VA-ECMO period compared to 34 °C and 24 °C with rewarming (p < 0.001). Vasopressin requirement was higher in animals treated with 24 °C without rewarming (p = 0.07). Compared to 34 °C, animals treated with 24 °C with rewarming were less coagulopathic and had less immunohistochemistry-detected neurologic injury. There were no differences in global brain injury score.

Conclusions

Despite improvement in carotid blood flow and immunohistochemistry detected neurologic injury, reperfusion at 24 °C with or without rewarming did not reduce early global brain injury compared to 34 °C in a swine model of ECPR.

体外心肺复苏猪模型中轻度低体温(34 °C)与中度低体温(24 °C)的比较
背景低体温在心跳骤停后神经保护中的作用尚存争议。动物研究表明,低温具有潜在的益处,但缺乏评估温度低于 30 ℃ 的高保真 ECPR 模型。方法24 头雌性猪电诱导 VF 并进行机械心肺复苏 30 分钟。给动物插管进行 VA-ECMO 并在 34 ℃ 下冷却 4 小时(8 头),在 24 ℃ 下冷却 1 小时并在 3 小时内复温至 34 ℃(7 头),或在 24 ℃ 下冷却 4 小时而不复温(9 头)。VA-ECMO再灌注时通过氧合器循环冰水开始降温。脑温、大脑和全身血流动力学得到持续监测。VA-ECMO 四小时后,获取脑组织进行检查。结果再灌注 30 分钟内达到目标脑温(p = 0.74)。在整个 VA-ECMO 期间,24 °C(未复温)组的颈动脉血流量高于 34 °C(复温)组和 24 °C(复温)组(p < 0.001)。24 °C无复温组动物的血管加压素需求量更高(p = 0.07)。与34 °C相比,接受24 °C复温治疗的动物凝血病变较少,免疫组化检测到的神经损伤也较少。结论尽管颈动脉血流和免疫组化检测到的神经损伤有所改善,但在猪 ECPR 模型中,与 34 ℃ 相比,24 ℃ 再灌注加或不加回温并不能减轻早期全脑损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信