A comparative study on mechanical-electrical-thermal characteristics and failure mechanism of LFP/NMC/LTO batteries under mechanical abuse

IF 15 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"A comparative study on mechanical-electrical-thermal characteristics and failure mechanism of LFP/NMC/LTO batteries under mechanical abuse","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.etran.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the failure behaviors and failure mechanisms of lithium-ion batteries under mechanical abuse is essential for numerical reconstruction of abuse scenarios for different types of cells. This study investigates the mechanical-electrical-thermal characteristics, components tensile properties and failure mechanisms of LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP), Li(Ni<sub>0.5</sub>Mn<sub>0.3</sub>Co<sub>0.2</sub>)O<sub>2</sub> (NMC), and Li<sub>2</sub>TiO<sub>3</sub> (LTO) cells through indentation experiments, including ball intrusion, cylindrical intrusion, and out-of-plane compression modes at quasi-static loading rates. Additional ball intrusion experiments were conducted at varying loading rates. This study compares the effects of different material systems on battery performance under standardized mechanical abuse conditions. Post-test examinations analyze surface damage and internal component fracture morphology. Two distinct fracture modes were observed: ductile fracture and brittle fracture. The findings suggest that, under the same loading mode, LTO cells exhibit distinct failure behavior compared to NMC and LFP cells, attributed to differing material properties and resulting fracture modes during intrusion. Based on the analysis of the tensile results of the battery components, the cell fracture mode may be related to the tensile strength of the separator. The loading rate significantly impacts the mechanical-electrical-thermal performance of pouch cells, resulting in increased cell stiffness and shorter internal short circuit duration at higher loading speeds. However, the effect of loading rate is consistent across cells with different material systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36355,"journal":{"name":"Etransportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etransportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116824000493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the failure behaviors and failure mechanisms of lithium-ion batteries under mechanical abuse is essential for numerical reconstruction of abuse scenarios for different types of cells. This study investigates the mechanical-electrical-thermal characteristics, components tensile properties and failure mechanisms of LiFePO4 (LFP), Li(Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2)O2 (NMC), and Li2TiO3 (LTO) cells through indentation experiments, including ball intrusion, cylindrical intrusion, and out-of-plane compression modes at quasi-static loading rates. Additional ball intrusion experiments were conducted at varying loading rates. This study compares the effects of different material systems on battery performance under standardized mechanical abuse conditions. Post-test examinations analyze surface damage and internal component fracture morphology. Two distinct fracture modes were observed: ductile fracture and brittle fracture. The findings suggest that, under the same loading mode, LTO cells exhibit distinct failure behavior compared to NMC and LFP cells, attributed to differing material properties and resulting fracture modes during intrusion. Based on the analysis of the tensile results of the battery components, the cell fracture mode may be related to the tensile strength of the separator. The loading rate significantly impacts the mechanical-electrical-thermal performance of pouch cells, resulting in increased cell stiffness and shorter internal short circuit duration at higher loading speeds. However, the effect of loading rate is consistent across cells with different material systems.

机械滥用条件下 LFP/NMC/LTO 电池机械-电气-热特性和失效机理的比较研究
了解锂离子电池在机械滥用情况下的失效行为和失效机理,对于数值重建不同类型电池的滥用情景至关重要。本研究通过压入实验,包括球形压入、圆柱形压入和准静态加载速率下的平面外压缩模式,研究了磷酸铁锂(LFP)、镍钴锰酸锂(NMC)和氧化钛锂(LTO)电池的机械-电气-热特性、组件拉伸性能和失效机制。此外,还进行了不同加载速率下的球侵入实验。这项研究比较了不同材料系统在标准化机械滥用条件下对电池性能的影响。测试后检查分析了表面损伤和内部组件断裂形态。观察到两种截然不同的断裂模式:韧性断裂和脆性断裂。研究结果表明,在相同的加载模式下,与 NMC 和 LFP 电池相比,LTO 电池表现出不同的失效行为,这归因于不同的材料特性以及在侵入过程中产生的断裂模式。根据对电池组件拉伸结果的分析,电池的断裂模式可能与隔膜的拉伸强度有关。加载速度对袋装电池的机械-电气-热性能有重大影响,在加载速度较高时,电池刚度增加,内部短路持续时间缩短。不过,加载速度对不同材料系统电池的影响是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Etransportation
Etransportation Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
12.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: eTransportation is a scholarly journal that aims to advance knowledge in the field of electric transportation. It focuses on all modes of transportation that utilize electricity as their primary source of energy, including electric vehicles, trains, ships, and aircraft. The journal covers all stages of research, development, and testing of new technologies, systems, and devices related to electrical transportation. The journal welcomes the use of simulation and analysis tools at the system, transport, or device level. Its primary emphasis is on the study of the electrical and electronic aspects of transportation systems. However, it also considers research on mechanical parts or subsystems of vehicles if there is a clear interaction with electrical or electronic equipment. Please note that this journal excludes other aspects such as sociological, political, regulatory, or environmental factors from its scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信