Improving inclusion of people with reduced intellectual abilities in consumer testing

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
G. López-Font , M.C. Suárez-Figueroa , C. Chaya
{"title":"Improving inclusion of people with reduced intellectual abilities in consumer testing","authors":"G. López-Font ,&nbsp;M.C. Suárez-Figueroa ,&nbsp;C. Chaya","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nowadays, the inclusion of people with reduced intellectual abilities (PWRIA) in all areas of life is being pursued, but so far, there are no specific guides and tests for this population group to be considered while conducting consumer tests. However, consumer tests need to be adapted to be really inclusive of PWRIA in the consumer panels. The aim of this paper was to develop different methodological adaptations to promote the inclusion of PWRIA in sensory consumer tests and to test the adaptations in consumers from the PWRIA group. For this purpose, different scales commonly used in sensory science were adapted to a specific population group with reduced intellectual abilities (RIA). In addition, the utility of the adapted scales was tested by comparing the responses of this consumer group when testing a set of biscuits with those of a control group. Moreover, several modifications of standard questionnaires were tested, such as the use of alternative coding methods of the samples and the use of easy-to-read (E2R) writing rules. No evidence was found on the negative effect of using three-digit number codes in the RIA group, indicating that the specific target group used in this study does not need to replace three-digit number codes for sample identification. A skewed distribution of responses (‘benevolent bias’) was found in the evaluation of samples by the RIA group compared with the control group, indicating the use of non-parametric tests for data analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 105296"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001988/pdfft?md5=a5ae516ddd480a783feabf279362a2e6&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324001988-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001988","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, the inclusion of people with reduced intellectual abilities (PWRIA) in all areas of life is being pursued, but so far, there are no specific guides and tests for this population group to be considered while conducting consumer tests. However, consumer tests need to be adapted to be really inclusive of PWRIA in the consumer panels. The aim of this paper was to develop different methodological adaptations to promote the inclusion of PWRIA in sensory consumer tests and to test the adaptations in consumers from the PWRIA group. For this purpose, different scales commonly used in sensory science were adapted to a specific population group with reduced intellectual abilities (RIA). In addition, the utility of the adapted scales was tested by comparing the responses of this consumer group when testing a set of biscuits with those of a control group. Moreover, several modifications of standard questionnaires were tested, such as the use of alternative coding methods of the samples and the use of easy-to-read (E2R) writing rules. No evidence was found on the negative effect of using three-digit number codes in the RIA group, indicating that the specific target group used in this study does not need to replace three-digit number codes for sample identification. A skewed distribution of responses (‘benevolent bias’) was found in the evaluation of samples by the RIA group compared with the control group, indicating the use of non-parametric tests for data analysis.

让智力减退者更好地参与消费者测试
如今,人们正在努力将智力减退者(PWRIA)纳入生活的各个领域,但迄今为止,在进行消费者测试时,还没有专门针对这一人群的指南和测试。然而,消费者测试需要进行调整,以便在消费者小组中真正纳入 PWRIA。本文的目的是制定不同的方法调整,以促进将残疾人融入感官消费者测试,并在残疾人群体的消费者中测试这些调整。为此,对感官科学中常用的不同量表进行了调整,以适应特定的智力减退人群(RIA)。此外,还通过比较该消费者群体在测试一套饼干时的反应和对照组的反应,检验了改编量表的实用性。此外,还对标准问卷的几种修改方法进行了测试,如使用其他样本编码方法和易读(E2R)书写规则。没有证据表明在 RIA 组中使用三位数数字编码会产生负面影响,这表明本研究中使用的特定目标群体不需要替换三位数数字编码来进行样本识别。与对照组相比,在区域影响评估组对样本的评估中发现了偏斜的回答分布("仁慈偏差"),这表明在数据分析中应使用非参数检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信