Sociocultural aspects of the medicalisation of infertility: a comparative reading of two illness narratives.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Annie James, Manjusha G Warrier, Ann Treessa Benny
{"title":"Sociocultural aspects of the medicalisation of infertility: a comparative reading of two illness narratives.","authors":"Annie James, Manjusha G Warrier, Ann Treessa Benny","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2024-012977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper is a comparative reading of variations in the medicalisation of infertility caused by sociocultural aspects, in two illness narratives by patients: Elizabeth Katkin's <i>Conceivability</i> (2018), a story of navigating a fertility industry with polycystic ovarian syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome in America and Rohini Rajagopal's <i>What's a Lemon Squeezer Doing in My Vagina</i> (2021), a discussion from India of a growing awareness of medicalisation in treatment of unexplained infertility. For this purpose, it first charts scholarship on illness narratives and medicalisation, noting a historical association. Following this, it shows how infertility, a physiological symptom of reproductive incapacity or failure to show clinical pregnancy, is generally medicalised. This paper reads the texts as showing hitherto unaddressed sociocultural aspects of infertility's medicalisation. At the same time, drawing from existing sociological and anthropological scholarship, it shows how a reading of sociocultural aspects in medicalised infertility nuances understanding of it's medicalisation. This comparative reading attends to sociocultural values and norms within the texts, including pronatalism, fetal personhood, kinship organisation, purity/pollution, individual reliance, sacred duty and so forth. It draws from scholarship on embodiment, rhetorical strategies and the language of medicine. It also shows how a patient's non-medicalised, affective history of 'deep' sickness caused by the biographical disruption of infertility is not that of a 'poor historian'. In laying out the particularisation of such sociocultural values and norms across America and India, medicalisation's migration from its origins to the margins reveals subjectivised, stratified reproduction in infertility illness narratives. This paper is part of a turn in scholarship away from understanding the medicalisation of infertility as naturalised and decontextualised.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-012977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is a comparative reading of variations in the medicalisation of infertility caused by sociocultural aspects, in two illness narratives by patients: Elizabeth Katkin's Conceivability (2018), a story of navigating a fertility industry with polycystic ovarian syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome in America and Rohini Rajagopal's What's a Lemon Squeezer Doing in My Vagina (2021), a discussion from India of a growing awareness of medicalisation in treatment of unexplained infertility. For this purpose, it first charts scholarship on illness narratives and medicalisation, noting a historical association. Following this, it shows how infertility, a physiological symptom of reproductive incapacity or failure to show clinical pregnancy, is generally medicalised. This paper reads the texts as showing hitherto unaddressed sociocultural aspects of infertility's medicalisation. At the same time, drawing from existing sociological and anthropological scholarship, it shows how a reading of sociocultural aspects in medicalised infertility nuances understanding of it's medicalisation. This comparative reading attends to sociocultural values and norms within the texts, including pronatalism, fetal personhood, kinship organisation, purity/pollution, individual reliance, sacred duty and so forth. It draws from scholarship on embodiment, rhetorical strategies and the language of medicine. It also shows how a patient's non-medicalised, affective history of 'deep' sickness caused by the biographical disruption of infertility is not that of a 'poor historian'. In laying out the particularisation of such sociocultural values and norms across America and India, medicalisation's migration from its origins to the margins reveals subjectivised, stratified reproduction in infertility illness narratives. This paper is part of a turn in scholarship away from understanding the medicalisation of infertility as naturalised and decontextualised.

不孕症医学化的社会文化方面:两种疾病叙事的比较解读。
本文通过两篇患者的疾病叙事,对社会文化因素导致的不孕症医学化的变化进行比较解读:伊丽莎白-凯特金(Elizabeth Katkin)的《可孕性》(Conceivability,2018 年)讲述了美国多囊卵巢综合征和抗磷脂综合征患者在生育行业中的故事;罗西妮-拉贾戈帕尔(Rohini Rajagopal)的《柠檬榨汁机在我的阴道里做什么》(What's a Lemon Squeezer Doing in My Vagina,2021 年)讨论了印度在治疗不明原因不孕症过程中对医疗化日益增长的认识。为此,该书首先介绍了有关疾病叙事和医疗化的学术研究,指出了两者之间的历史联系。随后,它展示了不孕症作为生殖能力丧失或未能显示临床妊娠的生理症状是如何被普遍医疗化的。本文通过对文本的解读,展示了不孕症医学化的社会文化方面迄今为止尚未解决的问题。同时,本文还借鉴了现有的社会学和人类学学术成果,说明对医学化不孕症的社会文化方面的解读如何使人们对不孕症医学化的理解更加细致入微。这种比较阅读关注文本中的社会文化价值观和规范,包括代孕论、胎儿人格、亲属组织、纯洁/污染、个人依赖、神圣责任等。它借鉴了有关体现、修辞策略和医学语言的学术研究。它还展示了患者因不孕不育的传记中断而产生的 "深度 "疾病的非医学化情感史,并非 "可怜的历史学家 "所为。在阐述这种社会文化价值观和规范在美国和印度的特殊化时,医疗化从其起源地向边缘地区的迁移揭示了不孕不育疾病叙事中的主观化、分层化再现。本文是学术研究转向的一部分,即不再将不孕症的医学化理解为自然化和非语境化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信