Adjustment of lactate dehydrogenase concentration results according to the haemolysis index following in vitro haemolysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Claudio Ilardo, Guillaume Coulon, Amandine Lancien, Yann Olejnik, Joel Barthes
{"title":"Adjustment of lactate dehydrogenase concentration results according to the haemolysis index following in vitro haemolysis.","authors":"Claudio Ilardo, Guillaume Coulon, Amandine Lancien, Yann Olejnik, Joel Barthes","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2024.2392633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the presence of haemolysis, the interpretation of the Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity result is a major operational challenge for medical laboratories: if the origin is intravascular, then the measurement will reflect the clinical reality, but in extravascular haemolysis, the laboratory will be confronted with an artefactual increase leading to false-positive high results. The aim of our study was to evaluate the adjustment of LDH concentration results according to the haemolysis index (HI). After designed a mathematical model to correct the LDH measured as a function of the haemolysis index using a Cobas 8000 analyser (Roche diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), LDH measurement of seventy-four duplicate samples were tested before and after exposure to extravascular haemolysis process. After <i>in vitro</i> haemolysis process, a significant increase haemolysis index (Man-Whitney U-Test <i>p</i> < 0.0001) were observed. Before process the HI median was 4 [2.0 - 6.75] and after HI median was 18 [10 - 35.75]. Without correction, LDH results showed a significant increase (<i>p</i> < 0.001) after haemolysis process and substantial analytical discrepancies (31/74) were observed according to TEa of CLIA. After correction, data showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.497) and the mathematical algorithm allowed to reduce the analytical discrepancies (2/74). If haemolysis was present <i>in vitro</i>, the mathematical algorithm increased the accuracy of the LDH results. However, the lack of discrimination between <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> haemolysis requires caution and the results should be reported only as a commentary to inform the clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"350-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2024.2392633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the presence of haemolysis, the interpretation of the Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity result is a major operational challenge for medical laboratories: if the origin is intravascular, then the measurement will reflect the clinical reality, but in extravascular haemolysis, the laboratory will be confronted with an artefactual increase leading to false-positive high results. The aim of our study was to evaluate the adjustment of LDH concentration results according to the haemolysis index (HI). After designed a mathematical model to correct the LDH measured as a function of the haemolysis index using a Cobas 8000 analyser (Roche diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), LDH measurement of seventy-four duplicate samples were tested before and after exposure to extravascular haemolysis process. After in vitro haemolysis process, a significant increase haemolysis index (Man-Whitney U-Test p < 0.0001) were observed. Before process the HI median was 4 [2.0 - 6.75] and after HI median was 18 [10 - 35.75]. Without correction, LDH results showed a significant increase (p < 0.001) after haemolysis process and substantial analytical discrepancies (31/74) were observed according to TEa of CLIA. After correction, data showed no significant difference (p = 0.497) and the mathematical algorithm allowed to reduce the analytical discrepancies (2/74). If haemolysis was present in vitro, the mathematical algorithm increased the accuracy of the LDH results. However, the lack of discrimination between in vivo and in vitro haemolysis requires caution and the results should be reported only as a commentary to inform the clinician.

根据体外溶血指数调整乳酸脱氢酶浓度结果。
在溶血的情况下,如何解释乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)活性结果是医学实验室在操作上面临的一大挑战:如果来源于血管内,那么测量结果将反映临床实际情况,但在血管外溶血的情况下,实验室将面临假性升高,从而导致假阳性高结果。我们的研究旨在评估根据溶血指数(HI)调整 LDH 浓度结果的效果。在使用 Cobas 8000 分析仪(罗氏诊断公司,德国曼海姆)设计了一个数学模型来校正作为溶血指数函数的 LDH 测量结果后,对暴露于血管外溶血过程前后的 74 份重复样本的 LDH 测量结果进行了测试。体外溶血过程后,溶血指数显著增加(曼-惠特尼 U 检验 p p = 0.497),数学算法可减少分析差异(2/74)。如果体外存在溶血现象,数学算法可提高 LDH 结果的准确性。不过,由于体内溶血和体外溶血之间缺乏区别,因此需要谨慎对待,报告的结果只能作为评论,供临床医生参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信