Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Recurrent/Persistent Head and Neck Squamous-Cell Carcinoma After Radiotherapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Luca Canali, Andrea Costantino, Giulia Mari, Bianca Maria Festa, Elena Russo, Caterina Giannitto, Giuseppe Spriano, Armando De Virgilio
{"title":"Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Recurrent/Persistent Head and Neck Squamous-Cell Carcinoma After Radiotherapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Luca Canali, Andrea Costantino, Giulia Mari, Bianca Maria Festa, Elena Russo, Caterina Giannitto, Giuseppe Spriano, Armando De Virgilio","doi":"10.1002/ohn.949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) in diagnosing persistent/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) after primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant publications until April 18, 2023.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy statement. The search was conducted independently by 2 investigators. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies-2 questionnaire. Extracted data were used to calculate the pooled DWI-MRI sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive and negative likelihood ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 618 patients from 10 studies were included for calculation of diagnostic accuracy parameters. At the level of the primary tumor, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.00) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.54-0.98) in the case of qualitative analysis, and, respectively, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66-0.89) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-0.96) for quantitative analysis. At the level of the neck, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75-0.95) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93) when images were analyzed qualitatively, and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.60-0.94) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97) when analyzed quantitatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DWI-MRI showed high diagnostic accuracy and should be considered if persistent/recurrent HNSCCs is suspected after primary CRT. No significant differences were found between qualitative and quantitative imaging assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) in diagnosing persistent/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) after primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Data sources: Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant publications until April 18, 2023.

Review methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy statement. The search was conducted independently by 2 investigators. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies-2 questionnaire. Extracted data were used to calculate the pooled DWI-MRI sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive and negative likelihood ratio.

Results: A total of 618 patients from 10 studies were included for calculation of diagnostic accuracy parameters. At the level of the primary tumor, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.00) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.54-0.98) in the case of qualitative analysis, and, respectively, 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66-0.89) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-0.96) for quantitative analysis. At the level of the neck, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75-0.95) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.93) when images were analyzed qualitatively, and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.60-0.94) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97) when analyzed quantitatively.

Conclusion: DWI-MRI showed high diagnostic accuracy and should be considered if persistent/recurrent HNSCCs is suspected after primary CRT. No significant differences were found between qualitative and quantitative imaging assessment.

弥散加权磁共振成像治疗放疗后复发/顽固头颈部鳞状细胞癌:系统综述与元分析》。
目的评估弥散加权磁共振成像(DWI-MRI)诊断原发性化放疗(CRT)后持续/复发性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的准确性:检索了Scopus、PubMed/MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库中的相关出版物,截止日期为2023年4月18日:根据诊断测试准确性系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目声明进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。检索由两名研究人员独立完成。采用诊断研究质量评估-2问卷对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估。提取的数据用于计算汇总的 DWI-MRI 敏感性、特异性、诊断几率比例以及阳性和阴性似然比:结果:计算诊断准确性参数时,共纳入了 10 项研究中的 618 名患者。在原发肿瘤层面,定性分析的集合敏感性和特异性分别为 0.96(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.89-1.00)和 0.81(95% CI:0.54-0.98),定量分析的集合敏感性和特异性分别为 0.79(95% CI:0.66-0.89)和 0.88(95% CI:0.77-0.96)。在颈部水平,定性分析图像的汇总灵敏度和特异度分别为0.87(95% CI:0.75-0.95)和0.84(95% CI:0.74-0.93),定量分析图像的汇总灵敏度和特异度分别为0.79(95% CI:0.60-0.94)和0.90(95% CI:0.82-0.97):结论:DWI-MRI显示出很高的诊断准确性,如果怀疑原发性CRT后有持续性/复发性HNSCC,应考虑使用DWI-MRI。定性和定量成像评估之间没有发现明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信