Distinguishing glioblastoma progression from treatment-related changes using DTI directionality growth analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
R van den Elshout, B Ariëns, M Esmaeili, B Akkurt, M Mannil, F J A Meijer, A G van der Kolk, T W J Scheenen, D Henssen
{"title":"Distinguishing glioblastoma progression from treatment-related changes using DTI directionality growth analysis.","authors":"R van den Elshout, B Ariëns, M Esmaeili, B Akkurt, M Mannil, F J A Meijer, A G van der Kolk, T W J Scheenen, D Henssen","doi":"10.1007/s00234-024-03450-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is difficult to distinguish between tumor progression (TP) and treatment-related abnormalities (TRA) in treated glioblastoma patients via conventional MRI, but this distinction is crucial for treatment decision making. Glioblastoma is known to exhibit an invasive growth pattern along white matter architecture and vasculature. This study quantified lesion development patterns in treated glioblastoma lesions and their relation to white matter microstructure to distinguish TP from TRA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Glioblastoma patients with confirmed TP or TRA with T1-weighted contrast-enhanced and DTI MR scans from two posttreatment follow-up timepoints were reviewed. The contrast-enhancing regions were segmented, and the regions were coregistered to the DTI data. Lesion increase vectors were categorized into two groups: parallel (0-20 degrees) and perpendicular (70-90 degrees) to white matter. FA-values were also extracted. To test for a statistically significant difference between the TP and TRA groups, a Mann‒Whitney U test was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 73 glioblastoma patients, fifteen were diagnosed with TRA, whereas 58 patients suffered TP. TP had a 25.8% (95% CI 24.1%-27.6%) increase in parallel lesions, and TRA had a 25.4% (95% CI 20.9%-29.9%) increase in parallel lesions. The perpendicular increase was 14.7% for TP (95% CI 13.0%-16.4%) and 18.0% (95% CI 13.5%-22.5%) for TRA. These results were not significantly different (p = 0.978). FA value for TP showed to be 0.248 (SD = 0.054) and for TRA it was 0.231 (SD = 0.075), showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.121).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our results, quantifying posttreatment contrast-enhancing lesion development directionality with DTI in glioblastoma patients does not appear to effectively distinguish between TP and TRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03450-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is difficult to distinguish between tumor progression (TP) and treatment-related abnormalities (TRA) in treated glioblastoma patients via conventional MRI, but this distinction is crucial for treatment decision making. Glioblastoma is known to exhibit an invasive growth pattern along white matter architecture and vasculature. This study quantified lesion development patterns in treated glioblastoma lesions and their relation to white matter microstructure to distinguish TP from TRA.

Materials and methods: Glioblastoma patients with confirmed TP or TRA with T1-weighted contrast-enhanced and DTI MR scans from two posttreatment follow-up timepoints were reviewed. The contrast-enhancing regions were segmented, and the regions were coregistered to the DTI data. Lesion increase vectors were categorized into two groups: parallel (0-20 degrees) and perpendicular (70-90 degrees) to white matter. FA-values were also extracted. To test for a statistically significant difference between the TP and TRA groups, a Mann‒Whitney U test was performed.

Results: Of 73 glioblastoma patients, fifteen were diagnosed with TRA, whereas 58 patients suffered TP. TP had a 25.8% (95% CI 24.1%-27.6%) increase in parallel lesions, and TRA had a 25.4% (95% CI 20.9%-29.9%) increase in parallel lesions. The perpendicular increase was 14.7% for TP (95% CI 13.0%-16.4%) and 18.0% (95% CI 13.5%-22.5%) for TRA. These results were not significantly different (p = 0.978). FA value for TP showed to be 0.248 (SD = 0.054) and for TRA it was 0.231 (SD = 0.075), showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.121).

Conclusions: Based on our results, quantifying posttreatment contrast-enhancing lesion development directionality with DTI in glioblastoma patients does not appear to effectively distinguish between TP and TRA.

Abstract Image

利用 DTI 方向性增长分析区分胶质母细胞瘤进展与治疗相关变化
背景:在接受治疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者中,通过常规磁共振成像很难区分肿瘤进展(TP)和治疗相关异常(TRA),但这种区分对于治疗决策至关重要。众所周知,胶质母细胞瘤沿白质结构和血管呈浸润性生长模式。本研究量化了经治疗的胶质母细胞瘤病灶的病变发展模式及其与白质微结构的关系,以区分TP和TRA:对确诊为 TP 或 TRA 的胶质母细胞瘤患者进行复查,并对治疗后两个随访时间点的 T1 加权对比增强和 DTI MR 扫描进行复查。对对比增强区域进行分割,并将这些区域与 DTI 数据进行核心注册。病变增大矢量分为两组:与白质平行(0-20 度)和垂直(70-90 度)。同时还提取了 FA 值。为了检验 TP 组和 TRA 组之间是否存在显著的统计学差异,进行了 Mann-Whitney U 检验:73名胶质母细胞瘤患者中,15人被诊断为TRA,58人被诊断为TP。TP的平行病灶增加了25.8%(95% CI 24.1%-27.6%),TRA的平行病灶增加了25.4%(95% CI 20.9%-29.9%)。TP 的垂直增加率为 14.7%(95% CI 13.0%-16.4%),TRA 为 18.0%(95% CI 13.5%-22.5%)。这些结果没有明显差异(P = 0.978)。TP的FA值为0.248(SD = 0.054),TRA的FA值为0.231(SD = 0.075),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.121):根据我们的研究结果,用DTI量化胶质母细胞瘤患者治疗后对比增强病灶发展的方向性似乎不能有效区分TP和TRA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信