Novel spin-lock time sampling strategies for improved reproducibility in quantitative T1ρ mapping.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
NMR in Biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1002/nbm.5244
Sandeep Panwar Jogi, Qi Peng, Ramin Jafari, Ricardo Otazo, Can Wu
{"title":"Novel spin-lock time sampling strategies for improved reproducibility in quantitative T1ρ mapping.","authors":"Sandeep Panwar Jogi, Qi Peng, Ramin Jafari, Ricardo Otazo, Can Wu","doi":"10.1002/nbm.5244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to optimize the sampling of spin-lock times (TSLs) in quantitative T1ρ mapping for improved reproducibility. Two new TSL sampling schemes were proposed: (i) reproducibility-guided random sampling (RRS) and (ii) reproducibility-guided optimal sampling (ROS). They were compared to the existing linear sampling (LS) and precision-guided sampling (PS) schemes for T1ρ reproducibility through numerical simulations, phantom experiments, and volunteer studies. Each study evaluated the four sampling schemes with three commonly used T1ρ preparations based on composite and balanced spin-locking. Additionally, the phantom and volunteer studies investigated the impact of B<sub>0</sub> and B<sub>1</sub> field inhomogeneities on T1ρ reproducibility, respectively. The reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV) by repeating the T1ρ measurements eight times for phantom experiments and five times for volunteer studies. Numerical simulations resulted in lower mean CoVs for the proposed RRS (1.74%) and ROS (0.68%) compared to LS (2.93%) and PS (3.68%). In the phantom study, the mean CoVs were also lower for RRS (2.7%) and ROS (2.6%) compared to LS (4.1%) and PS (3.1%). Furthermore, the mean CoVs of the proposed RRS and ROS were statistically lower (P < 0.001) compared to existing LS and PS schemes at a B<sub>1</sub> offset of 20%. In the volunteer study, consistently lower mean CoVs were observed in bilateral thigh muscles for RRS (9.3%) and ROS (9.2%) compared to LS (10.9%) and PS (10.2%), and the difference was more prominent at B<sub>0</sub> offsets higher than 50 Hz. The proposed sampling schemes improve the reproducibility of quantitative T1ρ mapping by optimizing the selection of TSLs. This improvement is especially beneficial for longitudinal studies that track and monitor disease progression and treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"e5244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to optimize the sampling of spin-lock times (TSLs) in quantitative T1ρ mapping for improved reproducibility. Two new TSL sampling schemes were proposed: (i) reproducibility-guided random sampling (RRS) and (ii) reproducibility-guided optimal sampling (ROS). They were compared to the existing linear sampling (LS) and precision-guided sampling (PS) schemes for T1ρ reproducibility through numerical simulations, phantom experiments, and volunteer studies. Each study evaluated the four sampling schemes with three commonly used T1ρ preparations based on composite and balanced spin-locking. Additionally, the phantom and volunteer studies investigated the impact of B0 and B1 field inhomogeneities on T1ρ reproducibility, respectively. The reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV) by repeating the T1ρ measurements eight times for phantom experiments and five times for volunteer studies. Numerical simulations resulted in lower mean CoVs for the proposed RRS (1.74%) and ROS (0.68%) compared to LS (2.93%) and PS (3.68%). In the phantom study, the mean CoVs were also lower for RRS (2.7%) and ROS (2.6%) compared to LS (4.1%) and PS (3.1%). Furthermore, the mean CoVs of the proposed RRS and ROS were statistically lower (P < 0.001) compared to existing LS and PS schemes at a B1 offset of 20%. In the volunteer study, consistently lower mean CoVs were observed in bilateral thigh muscles for RRS (9.3%) and ROS (9.2%) compared to LS (10.9%) and PS (10.2%), and the difference was more prominent at B0 offsets higher than 50 Hz. The proposed sampling schemes improve the reproducibility of quantitative T1ρ mapping by optimizing the selection of TSLs. This improvement is especially beneficial for longitudinal studies that track and monitor disease progression and treatment response.

新型自旋锁定时间取样策略提高了 T1ρ 定量绘图的可重复性。
本研究旨在优化定量 T1ρ 图谱中自旋锁定时间(TSL)的取样,以提高再现性。研究提出了两种新的 TSL 取样方案:(i) 可重复性指导下的随机取样 (RRS) 和 (ii) 可重复性指导下的优化取样 (ROS)。通过数值模拟、幻影实验和志愿者研究,将它们与现有的线性采样(LS)和精确引导采样(PS)方案进行了T1ρ再现性比较。每项研究都用三种常用的基于复合和平衡自旋锁定的 T1ρ 制备方法对四种取样方案进行了评估。此外,模型和志愿者研究还分别调查了 B0 和 B1 场不均匀性对 T1ρ 重现性的影响。重现性是通过变异系数(CoV)来评估的,在模型实验中重复 T1ρ 测量八次,在志愿者研究中重复五次。数值模拟结果显示,与 LS(2.93%)和 PS(3.68%)相比,拟议的 RRS(1.74%)和 ROS(0.68%)的平均 CoV 较低。在模型研究中,RRS(2.7%)和 ROS(2.6%)的平均 CoV 值也低于 LS(4.1%)和 PS(3.1%)。此外,拟议的 RRS 和 ROS 的平均 CoV 值在统计上也较低(P 1 抵消了 20%)。在志愿者的研究中,与 LS(10.9%)和 PS(10.2%)相比,RRS(9.3%)和 ROS(9.2%)在双侧大腿肌肉中观察到的平均 CoV 值一直较低,而且在 B0 偏移高于 50 Hz 时差异更为显著。所提出的采样方案通过优化 TSL 的选择,提高了 T1ρ 定量绘图的可重复性。这种改进尤其有利于跟踪和监测疾病进展和治疗反应的纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信