Vertebral Endplate Cavities with Titanium Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tarek Elfiky, Yaser El Mansy, Martin N Stienen, Abdelrahman Sa'ed Alabsi, Mahmoud Nafady
{"title":"Vertebral Endplate Cavities with Titanium Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.","authors":"Tarek Elfiky, Yaser El Mansy, Martin N Stienen, Abdelrahman Sa'ed Alabsi, Mahmoud Nafady","doi":"10.1055/a-2389-7682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Vertebral endplate cavities (VECs) have been reported with the use of titanium (Ti) cages. Only few articles have recently demonstrated unfavorable radiographic changes in the form of cysts or cavities, which may predispose to nonunion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The aim was to assess the prevalence of VEC in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using Ti cages and to estimate their impact on fusion. The term \"cavity\" was used to describe the endplate changes. Computed tomography (CT) analysis of the VECs and fusion status following PLIFs with Ti cages was conducted by two observers. VECs were assessed according to the size, multiplicity, location, and presence of sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Forty-two consecutive patients with surgeries conducted on 52 levels were enrolled. There were 20 males and 22 females. The mean age was 43.6 ± 10.89 years. The mean follow-up was 20.85 ± 8.49 months. Definite union was seen in 48 levels (92.3%) by observer 1 and in 40 levels (76.9%) by observer 2. The strength of agreement was moderate. The presence of VEC was observed in 9 levels (17.3%) by observer 1 and in 12 levels (23.1%) by observer 2. The strength of agreement was moderate. The majority of VECs in the endplates were less than 5 mm. The strength of agreement was high. The strength of agreement for location and multiplicity were moderate. The VEC was significantly correlated with the fusion status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Our study confirmed that VECs were observed following Ti cage placement after PLIF procedures. They tend to be small and might be associated with nonunion. Furthermore, it reflected the limited inter-rater reliability of the assessment of both the fusion status and VEC morphology after Ti PLIF cage placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2389-7682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Vertebral endplate cavities (VECs) have been reported with the use of titanium (Ti) cages. Only few articles have recently demonstrated unfavorable radiographic changes in the form of cysts or cavities, which may predispose to nonunion.

Methods:  The aim was to assess the prevalence of VEC in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using Ti cages and to estimate their impact on fusion. The term "cavity" was used to describe the endplate changes. Computed tomography (CT) analysis of the VECs and fusion status following PLIFs with Ti cages was conducted by two observers. VECs were assessed according to the size, multiplicity, location, and presence of sclerosis.

Results:  Forty-two consecutive patients with surgeries conducted on 52 levels were enrolled. There were 20 males and 22 females. The mean age was 43.6 ± 10.89 years. The mean follow-up was 20.85 ± 8.49 months. Definite union was seen in 48 levels (92.3%) by observer 1 and in 40 levels (76.9%) by observer 2. The strength of agreement was moderate. The presence of VEC was observed in 9 levels (17.3%) by observer 1 and in 12 levels (23.1%) by observer 2. The strength of agreement was moderate. The majority of VECs in the endplates were less than 5 mm. The strength of agreement was high. The strength of agreement for location and multiplicity were moderate. The VEC was significantly correlated with the fusion status.

Conclusions:  Our study confirmed that VECs were observed following Ti cage placement after PLIF procedures. They tend to be small and might be associated with nonunion. Furthermore, it reflected the limited inter-rater reliability of the assessment of both the fusion status and VEC morphology after Ti PLIF cage placement.

在腰椎后路椎体间融合术(PLIF)中使用钛制保持架的椎体终板腔(VEC)。
背景:椎板内腔(VEC)是在使用钛笼时出现的。最近只有少数文章证实了以囊肿或空洞形式出现的不利影像学变化,这可能会导致不愈合:目的是评估使用钛(Ti)保持架的后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)中 VEC 的发生率,并估计其对融合的影响。腔隙 "一词用于描述终板的变化。使用钛椎间融合器进行 PLIF 后,由两名观察者对 VEC 和融合状态进行 CT 分析。根据VEC的大小、多寡、位置和是否存在硬化进行评估:结果:42 名患者连续接受了 52 个层面的手术。其中男性 20 人,女性 22 人。平均年龄为(43.6±10.89)岁。平均随访时间为(20.85±8.49)个月。观察者 1 在 48 个层面(92.3%)和观察者 2 在 40 个层面(76.9%)看到了明确的结合。两者的一致性为中等。观察者 1 观察到 9 个层面(17.3%)存在 VEC,观察者 2 观察到 12 个层面(23.1%)存在 VEC。两者的一致程度为中等。内板中的大多数 VEC 为结论:我们的研究证实,PLIF 术后放置钛笼后可观察到 VEC。它们往往较小,可能与不愈合有关。此外,该研究还反映出,Ti PLIF 笼置入术后,对融合状态和 VEC 形态的评估在评分者之间的可靠性有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信