Barrett Schwartz, Vincent Nguyen, Michael Barats, Mustafa Motiwala, Sean Himel, David M Weatherford, Violiza Inoa-Acosta, Nitin Goyal, Nickalus R Khan, Daniel Hoit, Lucas Elijovich, Adam S Arthur, Christopher Nickele
{"title":"Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) examined in the trauma population.","authors":"Barrett Schwartz, Vincent Nguyen, Michael Barats, Mustafa Motiwala, Sean Himel, David M Weatherford, Violiza Inoa-Acosta, Nitin Goyal, Nickalus R Khan, Daniel Hoit, Lucas Elijovich, Adam S Arthur, Christopher Nickele","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous data on the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) vary widely, and studies based on these data are plagued with unintentional bias. Accurate prevalence data are paramount for any physician who counsels patients with intracranial aneurysms on rupture risk and treatment. We therefore sought to determine a more accurate number for the true prevalence of UIAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and tertiary care hospital in an urban setting between 2019 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients admitted with blunt trauma. Exclusion criteria included not having a head and neck CTA performed and read by an attending radiologist. All head and neck CTA radiology reads were reviewed for incidentally discovered UIAs. Subgroup analysis was performed by age group, race, and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5978 out of 8999 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 54 patients with 58 total aneurysms were identified giving an overall prevalence of 0.9%. Subgroup analysis was performed for all age groups, genders, and racial groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall aneurysm prevalence was found to be 0.9% in this sample. This rate is lower than rates previously cited in the literature and those quoted in local practice. This finding has significant implications when attempting to understand average rupture risk. Further studies are needed to power more subgroup analyses to use a more personalized approach to understanding an individual's risk of rupture.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1066-1070"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous data on the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) vary widely, and studies based on these data are plagued with unintentional bias. Accurate prevalence data are paramount for any physician who counsels patients with intracranial aneurysms on rupture risk and treatment. We therefore sought to determine a more accurate number for the true prevalence of UIAs.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and tertiary care hospital in an urban setting between 2019 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients admitted with blunt trauma. Exclusion criteria included not having a head and neck CTA performed and read by an attending radiologist. All head and neck CTA radiology reads were reviewed for incidentally discovered UIAs. Subgroup analysis was performed by age group, race, and gender.
Results: A total of 5978 out of 8999 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 54 patients with 58 total aneurysms were identified giving an overall prevalence of 0.9%. Subgroup analysis was performed for all age groups, genders, and racial groups.
Conclusion: The overall aneurysm prevalence was found to be 0.9% in this sample. This rate is lower than rates previously cited in the literature and those quoted in local practice. This finding has significant implications when attempting to understand average rupture risk. Further studies are needed to power more subgroup analyses to use a more personalized approach to understanding an individual's risk of rupture.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.