Using established biorepositories for emerging research questions: a feasibility study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Lente J S Lerink, Christopher W Sutton, Henny G Otten, Letizia Lo Faro, Rutger J Ploeg, Jan H N Lindeman, Sadr Shaheed
{"title":"Using established biorepositories for emerging research questions: a feasibility study.","authors":"Lente J S Lerink, Christopher W Sutton, Henny G Otten, Letizia Lo Faro, Rutger J Ploeg, Jan H N Lindeman, Sadr Shaheed","doi":"10.1186/s12014-024-09504-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proteomics and metabolomics offer substantial potential for advancing kidney transplant research by providing versatile opportunities for gaining insights into the biomolecular processes occurring in donors, recipients, and grafts. To achieve this, adequate quality and numbers of biological samples are required. Whilst access to donor samples is facilitated by initiatives such as the QUOD biobank, an adequately powered biobank allowing exploration of recipient-related aspects in long-term transplant outcomes is missing. Rich, yet unverified resources of recipient material are the serum repositories present in the immunological laboratories of kidney transplant centers that prospectively collect recipient sera for immunological monitoring. However, it is yet unsure whether these samples are also suitable for -omics applications, since such clinical samples are collected and stored by individual centers using non-uniform protocols and undergo an undocumented number of freeze-thaw cycles. Whilst these handling and storage aspects may affect individual proteins and metabolites, it was reasoned that incidental handling/storage artifacts will have a limited effect on a theoretical network (pathway) analysis. To test the potential of such long-term stored clinical serum samples for pathway profiling, we submitted these samples to discovery proteomics and metabolomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mass spectrometry-based shotgun discovery approach was used to obtain an overview of proteins and metabolites in clinical serum samples from the immunological laboratories of the Dutch PROCARE consortium. Parallel analyses were performed with material from the strictly protocolized QUOD biobank.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following metabolomics, more than 800 compounds could be identified in both sample groups, of which 163 endogenous metabolites were found in samples from both biorepositories. Proteomics yielded more than 600 proteins in both groups. Despite the higher prevalence of fragments in the clinical, non-uniformly collected samples compared to the biobanked ones (42.5% vs 26.5% of their proteomes, respectively), these fragments could still be connected to their parent proteins. Next, the proteomic and metabolomic profiles were successfully mapped onto theoretical pathways through integrated pathway analysis, which showed significant enrichment of 79 pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This feasibility study demonstrated that long-term stored serum samples from clinical biorepositories can be used for qualitative proteomic and metabolomic pathway analysis, a notion with far-reaching implications for all biomedical, long-term outcome-dependent research questions and studies focusing on rare events.</p>","PeriodicalId":10468,"journal":{"name":"Clinical proteomics","volume":"21 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-024-09504-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proteomics and metabolomics offer substantial potential for advancing kidney transplant research by providing versatile opportunities for gaining insights into the biomolecular processes occurring in donors, recipients, and grafts. To achieve this, adequate quality and numbers of biological samples are required. Whilst access to donor samples is facilitated by initiatives such as the QUOD biobank, an adequately powered biobank allowing exploration of recipient-related aspects in long-term transplant outcomes is missing. Rich, yet unverified resources of recipient material are the serum repositories present in the immunological laboratories of kidney transplant centers that prospectively collect recipient sera for immunological monitoring. However, it is yet unsure whether these samples are also suitable for -omics applications, since such clinical samples are collected and stored by individual centers using non-uniform protocols and undergo an undocumented number of freeze-thaw cycles. Whilst these handling and storage aspects may affect individual proteins and metabolites, it was reasoned that incidental handling/storage artifacts will have a limited effect on a theoretical network (pathway) analysis. To test the potential of such long-term stored clinical serum samples for pathway profiling, we submitted these samples to discovery proteomics and metabolomics.

Methods: A mass spectrometry-based shotgun discovery approach was used to obtain an overview of proteins and metabolites in clinical serum samples from the immunological laboratories of the Dutch PROCARE consortium. Parallel analyses were performed with material from the strictly protocolized QUOD biobank.

Results: Following metabolomics, more than 800 compounds could be identified in both sample groups, of which 163 endogenous metabolites were found in samples from both biorepositories. Proteomics yielded more than 600 proteins in both groups. Despite the higher prevalence of fragments in the clinical, non-uniformly collected samples compared to the biobanked ones (42.5% vs 26.5% of their proteomes, respectively), these fragments could still be connected to their parent proteins. Next, the proteomic and metabolomic profiles were successfully mapped onto theoretical pathways through integrated pathway analysis, which showed significant enrichment of 79 pathways.

Conclusions: This feasibility study demonstrated that long-term stored serum samples from clinical biorepositories can be used for qualitative proteomic and metabolomic pathway analysis, a notion with far-reaching implications for all biomedical, long-term outcome-dependent research questions and studies focusing on rare events.

利用已建立的生物库解决新出现的研究问题:可行性研究。
背景:蛋白质组学和代谢组学为深入了解供体、受体和移植物体内的生物分子过程提供了多种机会,从而为推进肾移植研究提供了巨大潜力。要实现这一目标,需要质量和数量足够的生物样本。虽然 QUOD 生物样本库等项目为获取捐献者样本提供了便利,但目前还缺少一个有足够能力的生物样本库,用于探索长期移植结果中与受者相关的方面。肾移植中心免疫实验室的血清库是丰富的受体材料资源,但尚未得到证实,这些实验室前瞻性地收集受体血清进行免疫监测。然而,目前还不能确定这些样本是否也适合用于-组学应用,因为这些临床样本是由各个中心采用不统一的方案收集和储存的,并经历了未记录的冻融循环次数。虽然这些处理和储存方面的问题可能会影响单个蛋白质和代谢物,但我们认为偶然的处理/储存假象对理论网络(通路)分析的影响有限。为了测试这种长期储存的临床血清样本进行通路分析的潜力,我们对这些样本进行了发现蛋白质组学和代谢组学分析:方法:我们采用了一种基于质谱的霰弹枪发现方法,对来自荷兰 PROCARE 联盟免疫实验室的临床血清样本中的蛋白质和代谢物进行了全面分析。与此同时,还对严格按照规程进行的 QUOD 生物库中的材料进行了分析:代谢组学分析结果表明,两组样本中可鉴定出 800 多种化合物,其中 163 种内源性代谢物在两个生物库的样本中均有发现。蛋白质组学在两组样本中都发现了 600 多种蛋白质。尽管与生物库样本相比,临床非统一采集样本中的片段比例更高(分别占蛋白质组的42.5%和26.5%),但这些片段仍然可以与其母体蛋白质联系起来。接下来,通过综合通路分析,蛋白质组和代谢组图谱被成功映射到理论通路上,结果显示有79条通路显著富集:这项可行性研究证明,从临床生物库中长期储存的血清样本可用于蛋白质组和代谢组通路定性分析,这一概念对所有生物医学、依赖于长期结果的研究问题和关注罕见事件的研究具有深远影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical proteomics
Clinical proteomics BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Proteomics encompasses all aspects of translational proteomics. Special emphasis will be placed on the application of proteomic technology to all aspects of clinical research and molecular medicine. The journal is committed to rapid scientific review and timely publication of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信