Remote proctoring during structural heart procedures: Toward a widespread diffusion of knowledge using mixed reality.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31187
Guido Ascione, Giovanni Rossini, Davide Schiavi, Nicolò Azzola Guicciardi, Matteo Saccocci, Nicola Buzzatti, Cosmo Godino, Ottavio Alfieri, Eustachio Agricola, Francesco Maisano, Paolo Denti
{"title":"Remote proctoring during structural heart procedures: Toward a widespread diffusion of knowledge using mixed reality.","authors":"Guido Ascione, Giovanni Rossini, Davide Schiavi, Nicolò Azzola Guicciardi, Matteo Saccocci, Nicola Buzzatti, Cosmo Godino, Ottavio Alfieri, Eustachio Agricola, Francesco Maisano, Paolo Denti","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its wide diffusion in surgical procedures, very few experiences are reported so far about the possible applications of remote proctoring (RP) in structural heart interventions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of RP during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using a mixed reality-based head-mounted display (HMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two users (a doctor and a proctor), wearing HMDs, were connected through a 5G network, allowing them to share audio and video signals. During the procedure, the proctor was located in a contiguous room, without any direct connection with the operator. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of HMD-mediated interaction if compared with direct in-person interaction. It was assessed using an operator-proctor interaction test based on six questions asked by the doctor to the proctor on six key procedural steps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2021 and April 2022, nine patients were enrolled in the study (15 clips delivered). The primary endpoint was reached in 9/15 clips implanted (60%). The first three failures were due to a chat software problem, and the others were linked with a 5G network malfunction. However, the HMD and its mixed reality tools were well tolerated by the operators, and no interference with the procedure was registered in any of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our experience, RP during structural heart interventions is feasible and efficacious. Wearing the HMD is comfortable and does not affect safety and effectiveness of interventional procedures. However, especially if considering a wide geographic use of this tool, a stable internet connection is imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite its wide diffusion in surgical procedures, very few experiences are reported so far about the possible applications of remote proctoring (RP) in structural heart interventions.

Aims: Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of RP during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using a mixed reality-based head-mounted display (HMD).

Methods: Two users (a doctor and a proctor), wearing HMDs, were connected through a 5G network, allowing them to share audio and video signals. During the procedure, the proctor was located in a contiguous room, without any direct connection with the operator. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of HMD-mediated interaction if compared with direct in-person interaction. It was assessed using an operator-proctor interaction test based on six questions asked by the doctor to the proctor on six key procedural steps.

Results: Between September 2021 and April 2022, nine patients were enrolled in the study (15 clips delivered). The primary endpoint was reached in 9/15 clips implanted (60%). The first three failures were due to a chat software problem, and the others were linked with a 5G network malfunction. However, the HMD and its mixed reality tools were well tolerated by the operators, and no interference with the procedure was registered in any of the cases.

Conclusions: In our experience, RP during structural heart interventions is feasible and efficacious. Wearing the HMD is comfortable and does not affect safety and effectiveness of interventional procedures. However, especially if considering a wide geographic use of this tool, a stable internet connection is imperative.

结构性心脏手术过程中的远程监考:利用混合现实技术广泛传播知识。
背景:目的:我们的目的是利用基于混合现实的头戴式显示器(HMD)证明经导管边缘到边缘修复过程中远程监查的可行性、安全性和有效性:方法:两名佩戴 HMD 的用户(一名医生和一名监查员)通过 5G 网络连接,共享音频和视频信号。在手术过程中,监查员位于一个相邻的房间,与操作员没有任何直接联系。主要终点是以 HMD 为媒介的交互与直接面对面交互相比的非劣效性。评估采用操作者与监查员互动测试,该测试基于医生就六个关键程序步骤向监查员提出的六个问题:2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 4 月期间,9 名患者加入了该研究(提供了 15 个剪辑)。植入的 9/15 枚夹子(60%)达到了主要终点。前三次失败是由于聊天软件问题,其他失败则与 5G 网络故障有关。不过,操作人员对 HMD 及其混合现实工具的耐受性很好,在所有病例中均未发现对手术的干扰:根据我们的经验,在结构性心脏介入过程中进行 RP 是可行且有效的。佩戴 HMD 非常舒适,不会影响介入手术的安全性和有效性。不过,特别是在考虑广泛使用这一工具时,稳定的互联网连接是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信