Do Children with High Callous-Unemotional Traits Have Attentional Deficits to Emotional Stimuli? Evidence from a Multi-Method and Multi-Informant Study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Anastasiya Ivanova-Serokhvostova, Kostas Fanti, Albert Bonillo, Hans Supèr, Montserrat Corrales, Iris Pérez-Bonaventura, Montserrat Pamias, Antoni J Ramos-Quiroga, Rafael Torrubia, Roser Nadal, Paul J Frick, Beatriz Molinuevo
{"title":"Do Children with High Callous-Unemotional Traits Have Attentional Deficits to Emotional Stimuli? Evidence from a Multi-Method and Multi-Informant Study.","authors":"Anastasiya Ivanova-Serokhvostova, Kostas Fanti, Albert Bonillo, Hans Supèr, Montserrat Corrales, Iris Pérez-Bonaventura, Montserrat Pamias, Antoni J Ramos-Quiroga, Rafael Torrubia, Roser Nadal, Paul J Frick, Beatriz Molinuevo","doi":"10.1007/s10578-024-01739-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Callous-unemotional (CU) traits in children and adolescents are linked to severe and persistent antisocial behavior. Based on past empirical research, several theoretical models have suggested that CU traits may be partly explained by difficulties in correctly identifying others' emotional states as well as their reduced attention to others' eyes, which could be important for both causal theory and treatment. This study tested the relationships among CU traits, emotion recognition of facial expressions and visual behavior in a sample of 52 boys referred to a clinic for conduct problems (Mage = 10.29 years; SD = 2.06). We conducted a multi-method and multi-informant assessment of CU traits through the Child Problematic Traits Inventory (CPTI), the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional (ICU), and the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions-Version 1.1 (CAPE). The primary goal of the study was to compare the utility of these methods for forming subgroups of youth that differ in their emotional processing abilities. An emotion recognition task assessed recognition accuracy (percentage of mistakes) and absolute dwell time on the eyes or mouth region for each emotion. Results from repeated measures ANOVAs revealed that low and high CU groups did not differ in emotion recognition accuracy, irrespective of the method of assessing CU traits. However, the high CU group showed reduced attention to the eyes of fearful and sad facial expressions (using the CPTI) or to all emotions (using the CAPE). The high CU group also showed a general increase in attention to the mouth area, but only when assessed by the CAPE. These findings provide evidence to support abnormalities in how those elevated on CU traits process emotional stimuli, especially when assessed by a clinical interview, which could guide appropriate assessment and more successful interventions for this group of youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01739-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Callous-unemotional (CU) traits in children and adolescents are linked to severe and persistent antisocial behavior. Based on past empirical research, several theoretical models have suggested that CU traits may be partly explained by difficulties in correctly identifying others' emotional states as well as their reduced attention to others' eyes, which could be important for both causal theory and treatment. This study tested the relationships among CU traits, emotion recognition of facial expressions and visual behavior in a sample of 52 boys referred to a clinic for conduct problems (Mage = 10.29 years; SD = 2.06). We conducted a multi-method and multi-informant assessment of CU traits through the Child Problematic Traits Inventory (CPTI), the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional (ICU), and the Clinical Assessment of Prosocial Emotions-Version 1.1 (CAPE). The primary goal of the study was to compare the utility of these methods for forming subgroups of youth that differ in their emotional processing abilities. An emotion recognition task assessed recognition accuracy (percentage of mistakes) and absolute dwell time on the eyes or mouth region for each emotion. Results from repeated measures ANOVAs revealed that low and high CU groups did not differ in emotion recognition accuracy, irrespective of the method of assessing CU traits. However, the high CU group showed reduced attention to the eyes of fearful and sad facial expressions (using the CPTI) or to all emotions (using the CAPE). The high CU group also showed a general increase in attention to the mouth area, but only when assessed by the CAPE. These findings provide evidence to support abnormalities in how those elevated on CU traits process emotional stimuli, especially when assessed by a clinical interview, which could guide appropriate assessment and more successful interventions for this group of youth.

Abstract Image

高冷漠-不情感特质的儿童对情感刺激有注意缺陷吗?来自多方法和多信息源研究的证据。
儿童和青少年的冷漠无情(CU)特质与严重而持久的反社会行为有关。基于以往的实证研究,一些理论模型认为,CU特质的部分原因可能是难以正确识别他人的情绪状态,以及对他人眼神的关注度降低,这对因果理论和治疗都可能具有重要意义。本研究测试了因行为问题而被转介到诊所的 52 名男孩(年龄 = 10.29 岁;标准差 = 2.06)的 CU 特质、面部表情的情绪识别和视觉行为之间的关系。我们通过儿童问题特质量表(CPTI)、冷漠无情量表(ICU)和亲社会情绪临床评估 1.1 版(CAPE)对 CU 特质进行了多方法和多信息评估。这项研究的主要目的是比较这些方法在对情绪处理能力不同的青少年进行分组时的实用性。情绪识别任务评估了每种情绪的识别准确率(错误百分比)和在眼睛或嘴巴区域的绝对停留时间。重复测量方差分析的结果显示,无论采用哪种方法评估 CU 特质,低 CU 组和高 CU 组在情绪识别准确率上都没有差异。然而,高 CU 组对恐惧和悲伤面部表情的眼睛(使用 CPTI)或所有情绪(使用 CAPE)的注意力有所降低。高 CU 组对嘴部的注意力也普遍增加,但只有在使用 CAPE 评估时才会出现这种情况。这些研究结果提供了证据,证明CU特质较高的人在处理情绪刺激时会出现异常,尤其是在通过临床访谈进行评估时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信