Regional differences in frailty among older adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Japan.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Akiko Nishimura, Chie Masuda, Chiyo Murauchi, Miho Ishii, Yuko Murata, Terumi Kawasaki, Mayumi Azuma, Hidenori Arai, Shin-Ichi Harashima
{"title":"Regional differences in frailty among older adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Japan.","authors":"Akiko Nishimura, Chie Masuda, Chiyo Murauchi, Miho Ishii, Yuko Murata, Terumi Kawasaki, Mayumi Azuma, Hidenori Arai, Shin-Ichi Harashima","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05223-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social environment may broadly impact multifaceted frailty; however, how environmental differences influence frailty in older adults with diabetes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate regional differences in frailty in urban and rural areas among older adults with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the frailty prevention program for older adults with diabetes study. Older adults aged 60-80 years who could independently perform basic activities of daily living (ADLs) were enrolled sequentially. Trained nurses obtained patient background, complications, body weight, body composition, blood tests, grip strength, frailty assessment, and self-care score results. Regional differences in frailty were evaluated using logistic and multiple linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 417 participants (269 urban and 148 rural). The prevalence of robustness was significantly lower in rural areas than in urban areas (29.7% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.018). Living in rural areas was associated with frailty (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-4.71) and pre-frailty (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.30-3.41). Lower instrumental ADL (B 0.28, standard error [SE] 0.073) and social ADL (B 0.265, SE 0.097) were characteristics of rural residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional differences in frailty were observed. Older adults with diabetes living in rural areas have a higher risk of frailty owing to a decline in instrumental and social ADLs. Social environment assessment and intervention programs that include communication strategies to enable care and social participation across environments are crucial to the effective and early prevention of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05223-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social environment may broadly impact multifaceted frailty; however, how environmental differences influence frailty in older adults with diabetes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate regional differences in frailty in urban and rural areas among older adults with diabetes.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the frailty prevention program for older adults with diabetes study. Older adults aged 60-80 years who could independently perform basic activities of daily living (ADLs) were enrolled sequentially. Trained nurses obtained patient background, complications, body weight, body composition, blood tests, grip strength, frailty assessment, and self-care score results. Regional differences in frailty were evaluated using logistic and multiple linear regression analyses.

Results: This study included 417 participants (269 urban and 148 rural). The prevalence of robustness was significantly lower in rural areas than in urban areas (29.7% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.018). Living in rural areas was associated with frailty (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-4.71) and pre-frailty (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.30-3.41). Lower instrumental ADL (B 0.28, standard error [SE] 0.073) and social ADL (B 0.265, SE 0.097) were characteristics of rural residents.

Conclusions: Regional differences in frailty were observed. Older adults with diabetes living in rural areas have a higher risk of frailty owing to a decline in instrumental and social ADLs. Social environment assessment and intervention programs that include communication strategies to enable care and social participation across environments are crucial to the effective and early prevention of frailty.

患有 2 型糖尿病的老年人虚弱程度的地区差异:日本一项多中心横断面研究。
背景:社会环境可能会对多方面的虚弱程度产生广泛影响;然而,环境差异如何影响糖尿病老年人的虚弱程度仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查城市和农村地区老年糖尿病患者虚弱程度的地区差异:这项横断面研究是老年糖尿病患者虚弱预防计划研究的一部分。年龄在 60-80 岁之间、能够独立完成基本日常生活活动(ADLs)的老年人按顺序被纳入研究。经过培训的护士负责了解患者的背景、并发症、体重、身体成分、血液检查、握力、虚弱程度评估和自我护理评分结果。采用逻辑和多元线性回归分析评估了虚弱程度的地区差异:这项研究包括 417 名参与者(269 名城市参与者和 148 名农村参与者)。农村地区的体弱患病率明显低于城市地区(29.7% 对 43.9%,p = 0.018)。居住在农村地区与虚弱(几率比 [OR] 2.55,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.38-4.71)和虚弱前期(OR 2.10,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.30-3.41)有关。工具性日常活动能力(B 0.28,标准误差 [SE] 0.073)和社交性日常活动能力(B 0.265,标准误差 0.097)较低是农村居民的特点:结论:虚弱程度存在地区差异。结论:观察到了虚弱的地区差异。居住在农村地区的老年糖尿病患者由于工具性和社会性 ADL 的下降而面临更高的虚弱风险。社会环境评估和干预计划包括沟通策略,以实现跨环境的护理和社会参与,这对有效和及早预防虚弱至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信