Effects of physical exercise on Akkermansia muciniphila: a systematic review of human and animal studies.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
S S Aguiar, F M Ribeiro, I V Sousa Neto, O L Franco, B Petriz
{"title":"Effects of physical exercise on Akkermansia muciniphila: a systematic review of human and animal studies.","authors":"S S Aguiar, F M Ribeiro, I V Sousa Neto, O L Franco, B Petriz","doi":"10.1163/18762891-bja00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to compile various research designs, including experimental, longitudinal, cross-sectional, and case studies in humans and experimental studies in rodents, to examine changes in Akkermansia muciniphila abundance in response to exercise. This comprehensive approach can improve our understanding of A. muciniphila response to physical exercise and highlight gaps in the literature, providing valuable insights for future microbiome research. Four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Sports Discuss) were searched in the literature. Quality assessment was conducted independently and in duplicate using two risk-of-bias tools (Downs and Black for human studies and SYRCLE's risk of bias for animal studies). 3,901 studies were identified, with thirteen human studies and nine animal studies included after screening. Of the thirteen human studies analysed, five (38.5%) were cross-sectional, seven (53.8%) were longitudinal/experimental, and one (7.7%) was a case study. These studies included 522 participants, among whom 157 were athletes, such as rugby players, marathon runners, triathletes, and skiers. Six studies reported an increase in A. muciniphila, five showed a decrease, and two found no significant differences. Regarding interventions, two studies used a combination of moderate-intensity strength and aerobic training, while seven used low to moderate-intensity aerobic exercises. In the nine rodent studies, eight (88.9%) were conducted on mice and one (11.1%) on rats, with all being experimental. These studies involved 310 animals. Eight studies reported a substantial increase in A. muciniphila, while one found no differences. Among these, eight employed moderate-intensity aerobic exercises as the intervention, and one utilised low-to-moderate-intensity strength training. The studies summarised in this review indicate that the impact of various physical exercise protocols on A. muciniphila abundance in humans remains controversial. However, rodent studies provide strong evidence that aerobic exercise increases A. muciniphila abundance in faecal pellets of both healthy and diseased models.</p>","PeriodicalId":8834,"journal":{"name":"Beneficial microbes","volume":" ","pages":"565-587"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beneficial microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to compile various research designs, including experimental, longitudinal, cross-sectional, and case studies in humans and experimental studies in rodents, to examine changes in Akkermansia muciniphila abundance in response to exercise. This comprehensive approach can improve our understanding of A. muciniphila response to physical exercise and highlight gaps in the literature, providing valuable insights for future microbiome research. Four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Sports Discuss) were searched in the literature. Quality assessment was conducted independently and in duplicate using two risk-of-bias tools (Downs and Black for human studies and SYRCLE's risk of bias for animal studies). 3,901 studies were identified, with thirteen human studies and nine animal studies included after screening. Of the thirteen human studies analysed, five (38.5%) were cross-sectional, seven (53.8%) were longitudinal/experimental, and one (7.7%) was a case study. These studies included 522 participants, among whom 157 were athletes, such as rugby players, marathon runners, triathletes, and skiers. Six studies reported an increase in A. muciniphila, five showed a decrease, and two found no significant differences. Regarding interventions, two studies used a combination of moderate-intensity strength and aerobic training, while seven used low to moderate-intensity aerobic exercises. In the nine rodent studies, eight (88.9%) were conducted on mice and one (11.1%) on rats, with all being experimental. These studies involved 310 animals. Eight studies reported a substantial increase in A. muciniphila, while one found no differences. Among these, eight employed moderate-intensity aerobic exercises as the intervention, and one utilised low-to-moderate-intensity strength training. The studies summarised in this review indicate that the impact of various physical exercise protocols on A. muciniphila abundance in humans remains controversial. However, rodent studies provide strong evidence that aerobic exercise increases A. muciniphila abundance in faecal pellets of both healthy and diseased models.

体育锻炼对 Akkermansia muciniphila 的影响:人类和动物研究的系统回顾。
本系统综述旨在汇编各种研究设计,包括对人类的实验研究、纵向研究、横断面研究和病例研究,以及对啮齿类动物的实验研究,以探讨运动对粘液蝇丰度的影响。这种全面的方法可以提高我们对粘液虹吸虫对体育锻炼反应的理解,并突出文献中的空白,为未来的微生物组研究提供宝贵的见解。在文献中检索了四个数据库(Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus 和 Sports Discuss)。使用两种偏倚风险工具(Downs and Black 用于人类研究,SYRCLE 的偏倚风险用于动物研究)独立进行了质量评估,评估结果一式两份。经过筛选,共确定了 3,901 项研究,其中包括 13 项人类研究和 9 项动物研究。在分析的 13 项人类研究中,5 项(38.5%)为横断面研究,7 项(53.8%)为纵向/实验研究,1 项(7.7%)为病例研究。这些研究包括 522 名参与者,其中 157 人是运动员,如橄榄球运动员、马拉松运动员、铁人三项运动员和滑雪运动员。六项研究报告称,粘液虹吸虫的数量有所增加,五项研究显示有所减少,两项研究未发现明显差异。在干预措施方面,两项研究采用了中等强度的力量和有氧训练相结合的方法,七项研究采用了中低强度的有氧运动。在九项啮齿动物研究中,八项(88.9%)以小鼠为研究对象,一项(11.1%)以大鼠为研究对象,所有研究都是实验性的。这些研究涉及 310 只动物。八项研究报告称,粘液虹吸虫的数量大幅增加,而一项研究则发现没有差异。其中,8 项研究采用中等强度的有氧运动作为干预措施,1 项研究采用中低强度的力量训练。本综述总结的研究表明,各种体育锻炼方案对人类体内粘液虹吸虫丰度的影响仍存在争议。不过,啮齿类动物研究提供了有力的证据,证明有氧运动会增加健康和患病模型粪便中的粘液虹吸虫数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Beneficial microbes
Beneficial microbes MICROBIOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Beneficial Microbes is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: the promotion of the science of microbes beneficial to the health and wellbeing of man and animal. The journal contains original research papers and critical reviews in all areas dealing with beneficial microbes in both the small and large intestine, together with opinions, a calendar of forthcoming beneficial microbes-related events and book reviews. The journal takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues, including safety aspects of pro- & prebiotics, regulatory aspects, mechanisms of action, health benefits for the host, optimal production processes, screening methods, (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics, host and bacterial physiology, application, and role in health and disease in man and animal. Beneficial Microbes is intended to serve the needs of researchers and professionals from the scientific community and industry, as well as those of policy makers and regulators. The journal will have five major sections: * Food, nutrition and health * Animal nutrition * Processing and application * Regulatory & safety aspects * Medical & health applications In these sections, topics dealt with by Beneficial Microbes include: * Worldwide safety and regulatory issues * Human and animal nutrition and health effects * Latest discoveries in mechanistic studies and screening methods to unravel mode of action * Host physiology related to allergy, inflammation, obesity, etc. * Trends in application of (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics * New developments in how processing optimizes pro- & prebiotics for application * Bacterial physiology related to health benefits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信