Evaluation indicators for access to cancer screening services: a scoping review

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Evaluation indicators for access to cancer screening services: a scoping review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Access to health services has received increasing attention, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) includes ‘availability’ as one of the indicators to evaluate cancer screening. Evaluating, monitoring, and decision-making on cancer screening depends on systematic quantitative evidence on access to cancer screening, but indicators are currently inconsistently, if they are reported at all. This can be improved by developing systematic indicators for evaluating and reporting access to cancer screening. This requires a thorough understanding of current indicators of access to cancer screening.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Scoping review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We completed a scoping review of studies on access to cancer screening services from 2013 to 2022. The relevant indicators were extracted, quantified, and then matched to two widely used frameworks: a universal five-dimensional conceptual framework for access to healthcare (‘U5D’) and a cancer-specific framework/list on the availability/use of screening indicators endorsed by the IARC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 331 studies on access to cancer screening services were included. Based on the U5D framework, publications from supply side reported approachability (number of publications = 16), acceptability (6), availability and accommodation (44), affordability (30), and appropriateness (11); among this process, 17 sub-indicators were identified. Correspondingly, publications from demand side reported ability to perceive (170), ability to seek (85), ability to reach (58), ability to pay (59), and ability to engage (2); 26 sub-indicators were identified. More macroscopically, the publications of the IARC-endorsed indicators reported availability of policies and guidelines for screening (13), type of screening provided (3), extent of population coverage and participation rates (76), and demographic/behavioural related considerations (167). By integrating the universal and cancer-specific frameworks, a new adapted framework was proposed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study identified and collated indicators for evaluating access to cancer screening services, and determined the gaps in the current application of various indicators. The findings are anticipated to facilitate further development of an evaluation indicator system for access to cancer screening services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624002816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Access to health services has received increasing attention, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) includes ‘availability’ as one of the indicators to evaluate cancer screening. Evaluating, monitoring, and decision-making on cancer screening depends on systematic quantitative evidence on access to cancer screening, but indicators are currently inconsistently, if they are reported at all. This can be improved by developing systematic indicators for evaluating and reporting access to cancer screening. This requires a thorough understanding of current indicators of access to cancer screening.

Study design

Scoping review.

Methods

We completed a scoping review of studies on access to cancer screening services from 2013 to 2022. The relevant indicators were extracted, quantified, and then matched to two widely used frameworks: a universal five-dimensional conceptual framework for access to healthcare (‘U5D’) and a cancer-specific framework/list on the availability/use of screening indicators endorsed by the IARC.

Results

A total of 331 studies on access to cancer screening services were included. Based on the U5D framework, publications from supply side reported approachability (number of publications = 16), acceptability (6), availability and accommodation (44), affordability (30), and appropriateness (11); among this process, 17 sub-indicators were identified. Correspondingly, publications from demand side reported ability to perceive (170), ability to seek (85), ability to reach (58), ability to pay (59), and ability to engage (2); 26 sub-indicators were identified. More macroscopically, the publications of the IARC-endorsed indicators reported availability of policies and guidelines for screening (13), type of screening provided (3), extent of population coverage and participation rates (76), and demographic/behavioural related considerations (167). By integrating the universal and cancer-specific frameworks, a new adapted framework was proposed.

Conclusions

This study identified and collated indicators for evaluating access to cancer screening services, and determined the gaps in the current application of various indicators. The findings are anticipated to facilitate further development of an evaluation indicator system for access to cancer screening services.

Abstract Image

获得癌症筛查服务的评价指标:范围界定审查
目标:医疗服务的可及性日益受到关注,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)将 "可及性 "作为评估癌症筛查的指标之一。癌症筛查的评估、监测和决策依赖于关于癌症筛查可及性的系统性定量证据,但目前的指标并不一致,即使有报告也是如此。通过制定评估和报告癌症筛查机会的系统指标,可以改善这一状况。研究设计范围界定综述。方法我们对 2013 年至 2022 年期间有关癌症筛查服务获得性的研究进行了范围界定综述。我们对相关指标进行了提取、量化,然后与两个广泛使用的框架进行了比对:一个是医疗保健普及的五维概念框架("U5D"),另一个是国际癌症研究机构认可的癌症筛查指标可用性/使用情况的特定框架/列表。结果共纳入了 331 项关于癌症筛查服务普及情况的研究。根据 U5D 框架,供应方的出版物报告了可接近性(出版物数量 = 16)、可接受性(6)、可用性和便利性(44)、可负担性(30)和适当性(11);在这一过程中,确定了 17 个子指标。相应地,来自需求方的出版物报告了感知能力(170)、寻求能力(85)、接触能力 (58)、支付能力(59)和参与能力(2);确定了 26 个次级指标。从更宏观的角度来看,国际癌症研究机构认可的指标出版物报告了筛查政策和指南的可用性(13)、提供的筛查类型(3)、人口覆盖范围和参与率(76),以及与人口/行为相关的考虑因素(167)。本研究确定并整理了用于评估癌症筛查服务可及性的指标,并确定了目前在应用各种指标方面存在的差距。预计研究结果将促进癌症筛查服务评估指标体系的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信