Modelling and optimization of concentrated solar power using response surface methodology: A comparative study of air, water, and hybrid cooling techniques

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"Modelling and optimization of concentrated solar power using response surface methodology: A comparative study of air, water, and hybrid cooling techniques","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research introduces a novel approach specifically designed to improve the design of Concentrated Solar Power plants utilizing the Response Surface Methodology. The objective of the suggested methodology is to enhance energy production efficiency by simultaneously minimizing the levelized cost of electricity and the land footprint associated with the power plant while comparing three different cooling techniques: air, water, and hybrid. Two software tools, System Advisor Model and Design-Expert, are employed to validate the primary model, evaluate the responses, generate the predictive models, and verify the results. The configuration of a Concentrated Solar Power plant is influenced by four main factors: the size of the solar field (solar multiple), row spacing, number of solar assemblies per loop, and size of thermal energy storage. In this study, these factors are varied within the following ranges: solar multiple from 1 to 5, row spacing from 10 to 30 m, number of solar assemblies from 4 to 10 per loop, and thermal energy storage from 5 to 15 h. The generated predictive models demonstrated very high accuracy, particularly for the annual energy production, with an error ranging between 0.2% and 1.5%. The findings showed that the hybrid cooling system is the most cost-effective cooling technique and has the highest energy output compared to the evaporative and air-cooling methods. When optimizing the required area of the hybrid cooled plant with a reduction of 47.44%, the analysis indicated a minimal decrease in energy output of 3.61% and a slight increase in the levelized cost of electricity by 0.95%. According to the results, the effect of area on the annual energy production and levelized cost of electricity is significant below the optimal area, while this effect becomes minor at higher values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424008562","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research introduces a novel approach specifically designed to improve the design of Concentrated Solar Power plants utilizing the Response Surface Methodology. The objective of the suggested methodology is to enhance energy production efficiency by simultaneously minimizing the levelized cost of electricity and the land footprint associated with the power plant while comparing three different cooling techniques: air, water, and hybrid. Two software tools, System Advisor Model and Design-Expert, are employed to validate the primary model, evaluate the responses, generate the predictive models, and verify the results. The configuration of a Concentrated Solar Power plant is influenced by four main factors: the size of the solar field (solar multiple), row spacing, number of solar assemblies per loop, and size of thermal energy storage. In this study, these factors are varied within the following ranges: solar multiple from 1 to 5, row spacing from 10 to 30 m, number of solar assemblies from 4 to 10 per loop, and thermal energy storage from 5 to 15 h. The generated predictive models demonstrated very high accuracy, particularly for the annual energy production, with an error ranging between 0.2% and 1.5%. The findings showed that the hybrid cooling system is the most cost-effective cooling technique and has the highest energy output compared to the evaporative and air-cooling methods. When optimizing the required area of the hybrid cooled plant with a reduction of 47.44%, the analysis indicated a minimal decrease in energy output of 3.61% and a slight increase in the levelized cost of electricity by 0.95%. According to the results, the effect of area on the annual energy production and levelized cost of electricity is significant below the optimal area, while this effect becomes minor at higher values.

Abstract Image

利用响应面方法对聚光太阳能发电进行建模和优化:空气、水和混合冷却技术比较研究
这项研究引入了一种新方法,专门用于利用响应面方法改进聚光太阳能发电厂的设计。所建议方法的目标是在比较三种不同冷却技术(空气、水和混合)的同时,最大限度地降低发电厂的平准化电力成本和占地面积,从而提高能源生产效率。系统顾问模型和 Design-Expert 这两个软件工具用于验证主要模型、评估响应、生成预测模型和验证结果。聚光太阳能发电站的配置受四个主要因素的影响:太阳能场的大小(太阳能倍数)、行距、每个环路的太阳能组件数量以及热能储存的大小。在本研究中,这些因素在以下范围内变化:太阳倍数从 1 到 5,行距从 10 到 30 米,每个环路的太阳能组件数量从 4 到 10,热能储存从 5 到 15 h。研究结果表明,与蒸发冷却和空气冷却方法相比,混合冷却系统是最具成本效益的冷却技术,也是能量输出最高的冷却系统。在优化混合冷却设备所需面积(减少 47.44%)的情况下,分析表明能量输出减少最少,仅为 3.61%,平准化电力成本略微增加 0.95%。结果表明,在最佳面积以下,面积对年发电量和平准化电力成本的影响很大,而面积越大,影响越小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信