Optical study of combustion stability in dual fuel approach using ammonia and high reactivity fuel

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mingsheng Wen , Yanqing Cui , Haifeng Liu , Zhenyang Ming , Mingfa Yao
{"title":"Optical study of combustion stability in dual fuel approach using ammonia and high reactivity fuel","authors":"Mingsheng Wen ,&nbsp;Yanqing Cui ,&nbsp;Haifeng Liu ,&nbsp;Zhenyang Ming ,&nbsp;Mingfa Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ammonia, as a zero-carbon fuel, is considered to be an ideal alternative fuel for a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. Owing to low laminar flame speed and high ignition energy, the utilization of pure ammonia in powerplant system still presents severe challenges. To solve these issues, the dual fuel combustion of high reactivity fuel and ammonia is a promising solution. However, the dual fuel combustion stability of ammonia and high reactivity fuel has not been clearly understood. In present study, the misfire reasons are investigated using various optical diagnostic methods. Results demonstrate that the misfire reasons are divided into two aspects. One is that the addition of ammonia increases the temperature and pressure required for direction injection fuel auto-ignition, which makes it difficult to generate auto-ignition site, resulting in misfire. The other is that the low flame development speed and degradation of the in-cylinder temperature and pressure causes the difficulty in the further flame development, which results in misfire. A collaborative regulation approach of engine operating condition and direction injection fuel reactivity is proposed to improve combustion stability, which achieves 93% ammonia energy ratio. At 93% ammonia energy ratio, increasing direction injection pressure from 600 bar to 1000 bar decrease combustion stability. The local equivalence ratio of direction injection fuel that can ignite ammonia stably is mainly concentrated between 0.56 and 0.86 in the conditions of 93% ammonia energy ratio and 22 bar in-cylinder pressure. Compared with the in-cylinder temperature, the main factor in determining combustion stability is local equivalence ratio of direction injection fuel. The addition of ammonia prolongs the low temperature reaction and constrains the high temperature reaction of direction injection fuel. In brief, the combustion stability and ammonia energy ratio can be improved simultaneously using the collaborative regulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424008513","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ammonia, as a zero-carbon fuel, is considered to be an ideal alternative fuel for a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. Owing to low laminar flame speed and high ignition energy, the utilization of pure ammonia in powerplant system still presents severe challenges. To solve these issues, the dual fuel combustion of high reactivity fuel and ammonia is a promising solution. However, the dual fuel combustion stability of ammonia and high reactivity fuel has not been clearly understood. In present study, the misfire reasons are investigated using various optical diagnostic methods. Results demonstrate that the misfire reasons are divided into two aspects. One is that the addition of ammonia increases the temperature and pressure required for direction injection fuel auto-ignition, which makes it difficult to generate auto-ignition site, resulting in misfire. The other is that the low flame development speed and degradation of the in-cylinder temperature and pressure causes the difficulty in the further flame development, which results in misfire. A collaborative regulation approach of engine operating condition and direction injection fuel reactivity is proposed to improve combustion stability, which achieves 93% ammonia energy ratio. At 93% ammonia energy ratio, increasing direction injection pressure from 600 bar to 1000 bar decrease combustion stability. The local equivalence ratio of direction injection fuel that can ignite ammonia stably is mainly concentrated between 0.56 and 0.86 in the conditions of 93% ammonia energy ratio and 22 bar in-cylinder pressure. Compared with the in-cylinder temperature, the main factor in determining combustion stability is local equivalence ratio of direction injection fuel. The addition of ammonia prolongs the low temperature reaction and constrains the high temperature reaction of direction injection fuel. In brief, the combustion stability and ammonia energy ratio can be improved simultaneously using the collaborative regulation.

使用氨和高活性燃料的双燃料燃烧稳定性光学研究
氨作为一种零碳燃料,被认为是减少二氧化碳排放的理想替代燃料。由于层燃速度低和点火能量高,在发电厂系统中使用纯氨仍面临严峻挑战。为了解决这些问题,高活性燃料和氨的双燃料燃烧是一个很有前景的解决方案。然而,人们对氨和高活性燃料的双燃料燃烧稳定性还没有清楚的认识。本研究使用各种光学诊断方法调查了失火原因。结果表明,失火原因分为两个方面。一是氨的加入增加了方向喷射燃料自燃所需的温度和压力,使自燃点难以产生,从而导致失火。另一方面是火焰发展速度低,缸内温度和压力下降,导致火焰难以进一步发展,从而导致失火。为提高燃烧稳定性,提出了一种发动机工况与定向喷射燃料反应性协同调节的方法,可实现 93% 的氨能比。在氨能比为 93% 的情况下,将定向喷射压力从 600 巴增加到 1000 巴会降低燃烧稳定性。在氨能比为 93%、缸内压力为 22 巴的条件下,能稳定点燃氨的定向喷射燃料的局部当量比主要集中在 0.56 至 0.86 之间。与缸内温度相比,决定燃烧稳定性的主要因素是定向喷射燃料的局部当量比。氨的加入延长了定向喷射燃料的低温反应,限制了其高温反应。简而言之,通过协同调节可以同时提高燃烧稳定性和氨能比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信