Frictional strength of siliciclastic sediment mixtures in fault stability assessment

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
D.C.A. Silva , E. Skurtveit , M. Soldal , A. Braathen
{"title":"Frictional strength of siliciclastic sediment mixtures in fault stability assessment","authors":"D.C.A. Silva ,&nbsp;E. Skurtveit ,&nbsp;M. Soldal ,&nbsp;A. Braathen","doi":"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Frictional strength of fault zones is a key parameter for evaluation of fault stability and reactivation. We measure friction using the direct shear test (DST) for (i) sand-clay mixes mimicking fault gouges, and (ii) strength of fault zone interfaces. The sand-clay mixing ratio is linked to the established Shale Gouge Ratio (SGR) used in fault seal analysis, suggesting an approach for linking the measured frictional properties to the established subsurface fault characterization methods and risk assessment. We use powdered caprock material from the Draupne Formation mixed with sand to prepare the fault gouge and discuss application of results for fault zones on the Horda Platform, Norwegian North Sea.</p><p>Shearing of fault gouge show a systematic decrease in residual friction coefficient with increasing clay content from 0.6 (φ = 31°) in pure sand (SGR 0%) to 0.4 (φ = 22°) for clay rich mixtures (SGR 100%). Interface testing mimicking fault gouge on sand surface is less systematic and shows residual friction coefficients ranging from 0.53 to 0.6 (φ = 28–31°) for SGR 0–50%. Detailed interpretation of the shear testing results shows changes in drainage properties, volumetric changes during shearing and shear responses to normal stresses indicating threshold values for sand versus clay dominated material behaviour. However, the results are non-conclusive on the question if a linear variation of friction with clay content or a threshold between sand dominated versus clay dominated friction provides the best approach for linking friction to fault clay content.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Geology","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 105232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124001846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frictional strength of fault zones is a key parameter for evaluation of fault stability and reactivation. We measure friction using the direct shear test (DST) for (i) sand-clay mixes mimicking fault gouges, and (ii) strength of fault zone interfaces. The sand-clay mixing ratio is linked to the established Shale Gouge Ratio (SGR) used in fault seal analysis, suggesting an approach for linking the measured frictional properties to the established subsurface fault characterization methods and risk assessment. We use powdered caprock material from the Draupne Formation mixed with sand to prepare the fault gouge and discuss application of results for fault zones on the Horda Platform, Norwegian North Sea.

Shearing of fault gouge show a systematic decrease in residual friction coefficient with increasing clay content from 0.6 (φ = 31°) in pure sand (SGR 0%) to 0.4 (φ = 22°) for clay rich mixtures (SGR 100%). Interface testing mimicking fault gouge on sand surface is less systematic and shows residual friction coefficients ranging from 0.53 to 0.6 (φ = 28–31°) for SGR 0–50%. Detailed interpretation of the shear testing results shows changes in drainage properties, volumetric changes during shearing and shear responses to normal stresses indicating threshold values for sand versus clay dominated material behaviour. However, the results are non-conclusive on the question if a linear variation of friction with clay content or a threshold between sand dominated versus clay dominated friction provides the best approach for linking friction to fault clay content.

断层稳定性评估中硅质泥沙混合物的摩擦强度
断层带的摩擦强度是评估断层稳定性和再活化的一个关键参数。我们利用直接剪切试验(DST)测量了(i)模拟断层破碎带的砂粘土混合物的摩擦力,以及(ii)断层带界面的强度。砂-粘土混合比与断层密封分析中使用的既定页岩沟隙比(SGR)相关联,从而提出了一种将测得的摩擦特性与既定的地下断层特征描述方法和风险评估联系起来的方法。我们使用来自德劳普内层(Draupne Formation)的粉状盖岩材料与沙子混合来制备断层破碎带,并讨论了结果在挪威北海霍尔达平台(Horda Platform)断层带的应用。断层破碎带的剪切显示,随着粘土含量的增加,残余摩擦系数系统性地降低,纯沙子(SGR 0%)的残余摩擦系数为 0.6(φ = 31°),而富含粘土的混合物(SGR 100%)的残余摩擦系数为 0.4(φ = 22°)。模拟砂表面断层刨削的界面测试系统性较差,在 SGR 0-50% 的情况下,残余摩擦系数从 0.53 到 0.6 不等(φ = 28-31°)。对剪切测试结果的详细解读表明,排水特性的变化、剪切过程中的体积变化以及对法向应力的剪切响应,都表明了砂和粘土主导材料行为的临界值。然而,对于摩擦力与粘土含量的线性变化,或砂土主导摩擦力与粘土主导摩擦力之间的临界值,是否是将摩擦力与断层粘土含量联系起来的最佳方法,结果尚无定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Geology
Journal of Structural Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
19.40%
发文量
192
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structural Geology publishes process-oriented investigations about structural geology using appropriate combinations of analog and digital field data, seismic reflection data, satellite-derived data, geometric analysis, kinematic analysis, laboratory experiments, computer visualizations, and analogue or numerical modelling on all scales. Contributions are encouraged to draw perspectives from rheology, rock mechanics, geophysics,metamorphism, sedimentology, petroleum geology, economic geology, geodynamics, planetary geology, tectonics and neotectonics to provide a more powerful understanding of deformation processes and systems. Given the visual nature of the discipline, supplementary materials that portray the data and analysis in 3-D or quasi 3-D manners, including the use of videos, and/or graphical abstracts can significantly strengthen the impact of contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信