A generalized framework of two-way coupled numerical model for fluid-structure-seabed interaction (FSSI): Explicit algorithm

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jianhong Ye , Haoran Zhou , Kunpeng He
{"title":"A generalized framework of two-way coupled numerical model for fluid-structure-seabed interaction (FSSI): Explicit algorithm","authors":"Jianhong Ye ,&nbsp;Haoran Zhou ,&nbsp;Kunpeng He","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a complex marine dynamics environment, the consideration of fluid-structure-seabed interaction (FSSI) plays a vital role in reliably analyzing the dynamic response of marine structures, and in assessing their structural dynamic stability. Currently, the predominant numerical analysis used worldwide for the problems of wave-seabed interaction and seawater-structure-seabed interaction is primarily the one-way coupling method. While only a few two-way coupled models are being developed. Consequently, two issues are brought up: (1) For the cases involving small deformation and displacement, the degree of discrepancy can't be quantitatively identified between the results obtained respectively from one-way coupling models and two-way coupled models which are more rigorous in mathematics and physics. (2) For the cases involving large deformation and displacement, one-way coupling models should be non-applicable. To address this problem, this study first proposes an explicit two-way coupling theory for the fluid-structure-seabed interaction. Then, a two-way coupled numerical model is developed by integrating the soil-structure dynamics software FssiCAS, and an OpenFOAM-based CFD solver OlaFlow by utilizing the data exchange library preCICE. This two-way coupled model has been embedded into the software FssiCAS. The reliability of the developed two-way coupled model is systematically validated through a rigorous verification process. Subsequently, a comparative study is conducted between the newly developed two-way coupled model and the existing one-way coupling model, to investigate the ocean wave-seabed interaction, as well as the interaction process between ocean wave, a breakwater, and seabed foundation. A comprehensive analysis is performed by comparing the differences in the wave profiles in fluid domain, dynamic displacement of structure and seabed foundation, seepage, pore pressure accumulation, and liquefaction in seabed foundation solved by the two-way and one-way coupled models. Finally, the suitability of the one-way and two-way coupled models in different applicable scenarios was discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"340 ","pages":"Article 107679"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795224002795","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a complex marine dynamics environment, the consideration of fluid-structure-seabed interaction (FSSI) plays a vital role in reliably analyzing the dynamic response of marine structures, and in assessing their structural dynamic stability. Currently, the predominant numerical analysis used worldwide for the problems of wave-seabed interaction and seawater-structure-seabed interaction is primarily the one-way coupling method. While only a few two-way coupled models are being developed. Consequently, two issues are brought up: (1) For the cases involving small deformation and displacement, the degree of discrepancy can't be quantitatively identified between the results obtained respectively from one-way coupling models and two-way coupled models which are more rigorous in mathematics and physics. (2) For the cases involving large deformation and displacement, one-way coupling models should be non-applicable. To address this problem, this study first proposes an explicit two-way coupling theory for the fluid-structure-seabed interaction. Then, a two-way coupled numerical model is developed by integrating the soil-structure dynamics software FssiCAS, and an OpenFOAM-based CFD solver OlaFlow by utilizing the data exchange library preCICE. This two-way coupled model has been embedded into the software FssiCAS. The reliability of the developed two-way coupled model is systematically validated through a rigorous verification process. Subsequently, a comparative study is conducted between the newly developed two-way coupled model and the existing one-way coupling model, to investigate the ocean wave-seabed interaction, as well as the interaction process between ocean wave, a breakwater, and seabed foundation. A comprehensive analysis is performed by comparing the differences in the wave profiles in fluid domain, dynamic displacement of structure and seabed foundation, seepage, pore pressure accumulation, and liquefaction in seabed foundation solved by the two-way and one-way coupled models. Finally, the suitability of the one-way and two-way coupled models in different applicable scenarios was discussed.

流体-结构-海底相互作用(FSSI)双向耦合数值模型的通用框架:显式算法
在复杂的海洋动力学环境中,考虑流体-结构-海底相互作用(FSSI)对于可靠分析海洋结构的动态响应以及评估其结构动态稳定性起着至关重要的作用。目前,全球用于波浪-海底相互作用和海水-结构-海底相互作用问题的主流数值分析方法主要是单向耦合法。只有少数双向耦合模型正在开发中。因此产生了两个问题:(1) 在涉及小变形和小位移的情况下,单向耦合模型与数学和物理学更为严谨的双向耦合模型分别得出的结果之间的差异程度无法定量确定。(2)对于涉及大变形和大位移的情况,单向耦合模型应不适用。针对这一问题,本研究首先提出了流体-结构-海底相互作用的显式双向耦合理论。然后,通过集成土-结构动力学软件 FssiCAS 和基于 OpenFOAM 的 CFD 求解器 OlaFlow,并利用数据交换库 preCICE,建立了一个双向耦合数值模型。该双向耦合模型已嵌入 FssiCAS 软件。通过严格的验证过程,系统地验证了所开发的双向耦合模型的可靠性。随后,对新开发的双向耦合模型和现有的单向耦合模型进行了对比研究,探讨了海浪与海底的相互作用,以及海浪、防波堤和海底地基之间的相互作用过程。通过比较双向耦合模型和单向耦合模型求解的流体域波浪剖面、结构物和海底地基的动态位移、渗流、孔隙压力积累和海底地基液化等方面的差异,进行了综合分析。最后,讨论了单向和双向耦合模型在不同应用场景下的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信