Celiac disease in North America: What is the current practice of pediatric gastroenterology providers?

JPGN reports Pub Date : 2024-05-27 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/jpr3.12087
Arunjot Singh, Jocelyn Silvester, Justine Turner, Imad Absah, Brandon A Sparks, Catharine M Walsh, Julia M Bracken, Joanna Stanisz, Temara Hajjat, Vahe Badalyan, Ankur Chugh, Edward J Hoffenberg, Jenna K Dowhaniuk
{"title":"Celiac disease in North America: What is the current practice of pediatric gastroenterology providers?","authors":"Arunjot Singh, Jocelyn Silvester, Justine Turner, Imad Absah, Brandon A Sparks, Catharine M Walsh, Julia M Bracken, Joanna Stanisz, Temara Hajjat, Vahe Badalyan, Ankur Chugh, Edward J Hoffenberg, Jenna K Dowhaniuk","doi":"10.1002/jpr3.12087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of pediatric celiac disease (CeD), current practices in North America are not well-described. This study aimed to explore current practice patterns to identify gaps and direct future clinical, training and research initiatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 23-item survey designed by the Celiac Disease Special Interest Group was distributed electronically to its members. Questions explored four themes: (1) screening and diagnosis pre and post the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic, (2) treatment and monitoring, (3) family screening and transition of care, and (4) CeD focused training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 10.8% (278/2552). Most respondents were from the United States (89.9%, <i>n</i> = 250) and Canada (8.6%, <i>n</i> = 24). While endoscopy remained the gold standard, serology-based diagnosis was accepted by 47.5% (132/278). In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 37.4% of providers changed their diagnostic practice. Barriers to care included: lack of insurance coverage for dietitians, wait times, and lack of CeD focused training. During fellowship 69.1% (192/278) reported no focused CeD training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Survey results revealed practice variation regarding the diagnosis and management of CeD in North America including a substantial proportion accepting non-biopsy, serology-based diagnosis, which increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Variations in screening, diagnosis, interval surveillance, and family screening were also identified. Dedicated CeD education in pediatric gastroenterology fellowship may be an opportunity for standardizing practice and advancing research. Future North American guidelines should take current care patterns into consideration and develop new initiatives to improve care of children with CeD.</p>","PeriodicalId":501015,"journal":{"name":"JPGN reports","volume":"5 3","pages":"276-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPGN reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpr3.12087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: While guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of pediatric celiac disease (CeD), current practices in North America are not well-described. This study aimed to explore current practice patterns to identify gaps and direct future clinical, training and research initiatives.

Methods: A 23-item survey designed by the Celiac Disease Special Interest Group was distributed electronically to its members. Questions explored four themes: (1) screening and diagnosis pre and post the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic, (2) treatment and monitoring, (3) family screening and transition of care, and (4) CeD focused training.

Results: The survey response rate was 10.8% (278/2552). Most respondents were from the United States (89.9%, n = 250) and Canada (8.6%, n = 24). While endoscopy remained the gold standard, serology-based diagnosis was accepted by 47.5% (132/278). In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 37.4% of providers changed their diagnostic practice. Barriers to care included: lack of insurance coverage for dietitians, wait times, and lack of CeD focused training. During fellowship 69.1% (192/278) reported no focused CeD training.

Conclusion: Survey results revealed practice variation regarding the diagnosis and management of CeD in North America including a substantial proportion accepting non-biopsy, serology-based diagnosis, which increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Variations in screening, diagnosis, interval surveillance, and family screening were also identified. Dedicated CeD education in pediatric gastroenterology fellowship may be an opportunity for standardizing practice and advancing research. Future North American guidelines should take current care patterns into consideration and develop new initiatives to improve care of children with CeD.

北美的乳糜泻:儿科胃肠病医生目前的做法是什么?
目的:虽然已有儿科乳糜泻(CeD)的诊断和管理指南,但北美地区目前的做法并不完善。本研究旨在探索当前的实践模式,找出差距并指导未来的临床、培训和研究活动:方法:"乳糜泻特别兴趣小组 "设计了一份包含 23 个项目的调查问卷,并通过电子方式分发给其成员。问题涉及四个主题:(1) 冠状病毒病 (COVID)-19 大流行前后的筛查和诊断;(2) 治疗和监测;(3) 家庭筛查和护理过渡;(4) 以乳糜泻为重点的培训:调查回复率为 10.8%(278/2552)。大多数受访者来自美国(89.9%,n = 250)和加拿大(8.6%,n = 24)。虽然内窥镜检查仍是金标准,但基于血清学的诊断得到了 47.5% (132/278)的认可。为应对 COVID-19 大流行,37.4% 的医疗服务提供者改变了诊断方法。医疗障碍包括:营养师缺乏保险、等待时间以及缺乏以 CeD 为重点的培训。在研究员培训期间,69.1%(192/278)的医疗服务提供者表示没有接受过以CeD为重点的培训:调查结果显示,北美地区在 CeD 诊断和管理方面存在实践差异,包括很大一部分人接受非活检、基于血清学的诊断,这种情况在 COVID-19 大流行期间有所增加。筛查、诊断、间隔监测和家庭筛查方面也存在差异。在儿科胃肠病学研究中开展专门的 CeD 教育可能是规范实践和推动研究的一个机会。未来的北美指南应考虑到当前的护理模式,并制定新的措施来改善对 CeD 儿童的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信