Social environment influences microbiota and potentially pathogenic bacterial communities on the skin of developing birds.

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Ester Martínez-Renau, Antonio M Martín-Platero, Kasun H Bodawatta, Manuel Martín-Vivaldi, Manuel Martínez-Bueno, Michael Poulsen, Juan José Soler
{"title":"Social environment influences microbiota and potentially pathogenic bacterial communities on the skin of developing birds.","authors":"Ester Martínez-Renau, Antonio M Martín-Platero, Kasun H Bodawatta, Manuel Martín-Vivaldi, Manuel Martínez-Bueno, Michael Poulsen, Juan José Soler","doi":"10.1186/s42523-024-00327-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Animal bacterial symbionts are established early in life, either through vertical transmission and/or by horizontal transmission from both the physical and the social environment, such as direct contact with con- or heterospecifics. The social environment particularly can influence the acquisition of both mutualistic and pathogenic bacteria, with consequences for the stability of symbiotic communities. However, segregating the effects of the shared physical environment from those of the social interactions is challenging, limiting our current knowledge on the role of the social environment in structuring bacterial communities in wild animals. Here, we take advantage of the avian brood-parasite system of Eurasian magpies (Pica pica) and great spotted cuckoos (Clamator glandarius) to explore how the interspecific social environment (magpie nestlings developing with or without heterospecifics) affects bacterial communities on uropygial gland skin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrated interspecific differences in bacterial community compositions in members of the two species when growing up in monospecific nests. However, the bacterial community of magpies in heterospecific nests was richer, more diverse, and more similar to their cuckoo nest-mates than when growing up in monospecific nests. These patterns were alike for the subset of microbes that could be considered core, but when looking at the subset of potentially pathogenic bacterial genera, cuckoo presence reduced the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic bacterial genera on magpies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the role of social interactions in shaping the assembly of the avian skin bacterial communities during the nestling period, as exemplified in a brood parasite-host system.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":"6 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-024-00327-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Animal bacterial symbionts are established early in life, either through vertical transmission and/or by horizontal transmission from both the physical and the social environment, such as direct contact with con- or heterospecifics. The social environment particularly can influence the acquisition of both mutualistic and pathogenic bacteria, with consequences for the stability of symbiotic communities. However, segregating the effects of the shared physical environment from those of the social interactions is challenging, limiting our current knowledge on the role of the social environment in structuring bacterial communities in wild animals. Here, we take advantage of the avian brood-parasite system of Eurasian magpies (Pica pica) and great spotted cuckoos (Clamator glandarius) to explore how the interspecific social environment (magpie nestlings developing with or without heterospecifics) affects bacterial communities on uropygial gland skin.

Results: We demonstrated interspecific differences in bacterial community compositions in members of the two species when growing up in monospecific nests. However, the bacterial community of magpies in heterospecific nests was richer, more diverse, and more similar to their cuckoo nest-mates than when growing up in monospecific nests. These patterns were alike for the subset of microbes that could be considered core, but when looking at the subset of potentially pathogenic bacterial genera, cuckoo presence reduced the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic bacterial genera on magpies.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the role of social interactions in shaping the assembly of the avian skin bacterial communities during the nestling period, as exemplified in a brood parasite-host system.

社会环境影响发育中鸟类皮肤上的微生物群和潜在致病细菌群落。
背景:动物的细菌共生体是在生命早期通过垂直传播和/或来自物理和社会环境的水平传播(如与同种或异种细菌的直接接触)建立起来的。社会环境尤其会影响互生细菌和致病细菌的获得,从而影响共生群落的稳定性。然而,将共享物理环境的影响与社会互动的影响分开是一项挑战,这限制了我们目前对社会环境在野生动物细菌群落结构中的作用的了解。在这里,我们利用欧亚喜鹊(Pica pica)和大斑杜鹃(Clamator glandarius)的鸟类育雏-寄生系统,探讨了种间社会环境(喜鹊雏鸟与异种或无异种雏鸟一起发育)如何影响尿道腺皮肤上的细菌群落:结果:我们发现,在单种巢中成长的两种喜鹊的细菌群落组成存在种间差异。然而,与在单特异性巢中长大的喜鹊相比,在异特异性巢中长大的喜鹊的细菌群落更丰富、更多样,而且与杜鹃巢中的同伴更相似。这些模式对于可被视为核心微生物的微生物子集来说是相同的,但当观察潜在致病细菌属的子集时,布谷鸟的存在降低了喜鹊身上潜在致病细菌属的相对丰度:我们的研究结果强调了社会互动在雏鸟时期鸟类皮肤细菌群落的形成中所起的作用,这在雏鸟寄生-宿主系统中得到了体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信