A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Xi Zhu, Li Gao, Jun Luo
{"title":"A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.","authors":"Xi Zhu, Li Gao, Jun Luo","doi":"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study pursued a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive accuracy of machine learning (ML) models in determining disorders of consciousness (DOC) among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify ML applications in the establishment of a predictive model of DOC after TBI as of August 6, 2023. Two independent reviewers assessed publication eligibility based on predefined criteria. The predictive accuracy was measured using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Subsequently, a random-effects model was employed to estimate the overall effect size, and statistical heterogeneity was determined based on <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> statistic. Additionally, funnel plot asymmetry was employed to examine publication bias. Finally, subgroup analyses were performed based on age, ML type, and relevant clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final analyses incorporated a total of 46 studies. Both the overall and subgroup analyses exhibited considerable statistical heterogeneity. Machine learning predictions for DOC in TBI yielded an overall pooled AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.82-0.84). Subgroup analysis based on age revealed that the ML model in pediatric patients yielded an overall combined AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95); among the model subgroups, logistic regression was the most frequently employed, with an overall pooled AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83-0.87). In the clinical outcome subgroup analysis, the overall pooled AUC for distinguishing between consciousness recovery and consciousness disorders was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this meta-analysis demonstrated outstanding accuracy of ML models in predicting DOC among patients with brain injuries, which presented substantial research value and potential of ML application in this domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study pursued a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive accuracy of machine learning (ML) models in determining disorders of consciousness (DOC) among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify ML applications in the establishment of a predictive model of DOC after TBI as of August 6, 2023. Two independent reviewers assessed publication eligibility based on predefined criteria. The predictive accuracy was measured using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Subsequently, a random-effects model was employed to estimate the overall effect size, and statistical heterogeneity was determined based on I2 statistic. Additionally, funnel plot asymmetry was employed to examine publication bias. Finally, subgroup analyses were performed based on age, ML type, and relevant clinical outcomes.

Results: Final analyses incorporated a total of 46 studies. Both the overall and subgroup analyses exhibited considerable statistical heterogeneity. Machine learning predictions for DOC in TBI yielded an overall pooled AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.82-0.84). Subgroup analysis based on age revealed that the ML model in pediatric patients yielded an overall combined AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.95); among the model subgroups, logistic regression was the most frequently employed, with an overall pooled AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83-0.87). In the clinical outcome subgroup analysis, the overall pooled AUC for distinguishing between consciousness recovery and consciousness disorders was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.85).

Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis demonstrated outstanding accuracy of ML models in predicting DOC among patients with brain injuries, which presented substantial research value and potential of ML application in this domain.

通过机器学习模型预测脑外伤后意识障碍的元分析》(A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brajury by Machine Learning Models)。
目的本研究通过荟萃分析,评估机器学习(ML)模型在确定创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者意识障碍(DOC)方面的预测准确性:我们进行了一次全面的文献检索,以确定截至 2023 年 8 月 6 日机器学习在建立 TBI 后 DOC 预测模型方面的应用。两名独立审稿人根据预先定义的标准对发表文章的资格进行评估。预测准确度采用接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行测量。随后,采用随机效应模型估算总体效应大小,并根据 I2 统计量确定统计异质性。此外,还采用漏斗图不对称性来检查发表偏倚。最后,根据年龄、ML类型和相关临床结果进行了亚组分析:最终分析共纳入了 46 项研究。总体分析和亚组分析均显示出相当大的统计学异质性。机器学习对创伤性脑损伤 DOC 的综合 AUC 为 0.83(95% CI:0.82-0.84)。基于年龄的亚组分析显示,儿科患者的 ML 模型的总体综合 AUC 为 0.88(95% CI:0.80-0.95);在各模型亚组中,逻辑回归是最常用的模型,总体综合 AUC 为 0.85(95% CI:0.83-0.87)。在临床结果亚组分析中,区分意识恢复和意识障碍的总体汇总AUC为0.84(95% CI:0.82-0.85):这项荟萃分析的结果表明,ML 模型在预测脑损伤患者 DOC 方面具有出色的准确性,这为 ML 在该领域的应用提供了巨大的研究价值和潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信