A comparison of written case notes and the delivery of care in dementia specialist mental health wards.

Ian Davies-Abbott, Joanne Daunt, Emma Roberts
{"title":"A comparison of written case notes and the delivery of care in dementia specialist mental health wards.","authors":"Ian Davies-Abbott, Joanne Daunt, Emma Roberts","doi":"10.1177/14713012241274994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Stigmatising language concerning people living with dementia can cause potentially harmful and dehumanising consequences. Language used about people living with dementia in mental health wards may focus on medical perspectives and suggest custodial relationships with patients rather than person-centred accounts of individuals. This language could have a devastating impact on the provision of person-centred care. This study investigated the relationship between accounts of people living with dementia written in healthcare case notes and clinical practice at three dementia specialist wards in Wales, UK. Language guidance was provided to ward staff to assess whether stigmatising language could be reduced and whether this influenced the provision of person-centred care.<b>Methodology:</b> Dementia Care Mapping was adapted to analyse case note entries for enhancing and detracting accounts of people living with dementia at three data collection points. These were compared to the results of routine DCM observations of care across the three wards. The healthcare case notes of 117 people living with dementia, encompassing 4, 522 entries over ten months were analysed. DCM observations of 38 people living with dementia within the three wards were compared against the case note results. Person-centred language guidance was shared with care staff following each data collection point.<b>Results:</b> Following the provision of person-centered language guidance, the use of personally enhancing language was observed to increase across all three wards. Non-person-centred case note entries predominantly focussed on Labelling language, whilst language concerning Invalidation and Objectification also occurred frequently compared to other DCM domains. Person centred language typically concerned Acknowledgement. A relationship between case note entries and practice was evident in some domains although findings were inconsistent.<b>Discussion and Implications:</b> The findings highlight the importance of addressing stigmatising language in healthcare and suggest that further studies to support the anti-stigma agenda in dementia care are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012241274994"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241274994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stigmatising language concerning people living with dementia can cause potentially harmful and dehumanising consequences. Language used about people living with dementia in mental health wards may focus on medical perspectives and suggest custodial relationships with patients rather than person-centred accounts of individuals. This language could have a devastating impact on the provision of person-centred care. This study investigated the relationship between accounts of people living with dementia written in healthcare case notes and clinical practice at three dementia specialist wards in Wales, UK. Language guidance was provided to ward staff to assess whether stigmatising language could be reduced and whether this influenced the provision of person-centred care.Methodology: Dementia Care Mapping was adapted to analyse case note entries for enhancing and detracting accounts of people living with dementia at three data collection points. These were compared to the results of routine DCM observations of care across the three wards. The healthcare case notes of 117 people living with dementia, encompassing 4, 522 entries over ten months were analysed. DCM observations of 38 people living with dementia within the three wards were compared against the case note results. Person-centred language guidance was shared with care staff following each data collection point.Results: Following the provision of person-centered language guidance, the use of personally enhancing language was observed to increase across all three wards. Non-person-centred case note entries predominantly focussed on Labelling language, whilst language concerning Invalidation and Objectification also occurred frequently compared to other DCM domains. Person centred language typically concerned Acknowledgement. A relationship between case note entries and practice was evident in some domains although findings were inconsistent.Discussion and Implications: The findings highlight the importance of addressing stigmatising language in healthcare and suggest that further studies to support the anti-stigma agenda in dementia care are required.

书面病例记录与痴呆症专科精神病房护理服务的比较。
导言:针对痴呆症患者的污名化语言可能会造成潜在的伤害和非人化后果。在精神健康病房中,有关痴呆症患者的语言可能侧重于医学角度,并暗示着与患者之间的监护关系,而不是以人为本的个人描述。这种语言可能会对提供以人为本的护理产生破坏性影响。本研究调查了英国威尔士三家痴呆症专科病房在医疗病例记录中对痴呆症患者的描述与临床实践之间的关系。研究人员为病房工作人员提供了语言指导,以评估是否可以减少鄙视性语言,以及这是否会影响以人为本的护理服务:方法:对痴呆症护理图谱进行了调整,以分析病例记录条目中三个数据收集点对痴呆症患者的增强和减弱描述。这些数据与 DCM 对三间病房的常规护理观察结果进行了比较。我们分析了 117 名痴呆症患者的医疗病例记录,包括十个月内的 4522 个条目。将三个病房中 38 名痴呆症患者的 DCM 观察结果与病例记录结果进行了比较。在每个数据收集点之后,与护理人员分享了以人为本的语言指导:结果:在提供了以人为本的语言指导后,我们观察到在所有三个病房中使用个人化语言的人数都有所增加。与其他 DCM 领域相比,非以人为本的病例记录主要集中在标签化语言上,而有关无效和客观化的语言也经常出现。以人为本的语言通常与 "认可 "有关。病例记录与实践之间的关系在某些领域非常明显,但结果并不一致:这些发现强调了解决医疗保健中污名化语言的重要性,并表明需要进一步开展研究,以支持痴呆症护理中的反污名化议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信