Decision Aid-Led Tapering of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Qualitative Study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Jungyeon Lee, Claire E H Barber, Michelle Jung, Elzbieta Kaminska, Nick Bansback, Dawn Richards, Laurie Proulx, Ann Rebutoc, Glen S Hazlewood
{"title":"Decision Aid-Led Tapering of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Jungyeon Lee, Claire E H Barber, Michelle Jung, Elzbieta Kaminska, Nick Bansback, Dawn Richards, Laurie Proulx, Ann Rebutoc, Glen S Hazlewood","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-0383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experiences and perspectives of patients and rheumatologists on decision aid (DA)-led tapering of advanced therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were completed with patients and rheumatologists, embedded within a pilot study of DA-led tapering (ie, dose reduction) of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) in RA. All patients were in sustained (≥ 6 mos) remission and had chosen to reduce their therapy after a DA-led shared decision with their rheumatologist. The rheumatologists included those participating in the pilot (n = 4), and those who were not (n = 8). Reflexive thematic analysis of audiotaped and transcribed interviews identified themes in the group experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (n = 10, 6 female) unanimously found the DA easy to understand and felt confident in shared decision making about treatment tapering and managing flares. Rheumatologists' (n = 12, 5 female) perspectives on tapering bDMARDs and tsDMARDs varied widely, from very supportive to completely opposed, and influenced their views on the DA. Rheumatologists expressed concerns about patient comprehension, destabilizing a stable situation, risks of flare, and extending appointment times. Despite their initial reservations about sending the DA to all eligible patients ahead of appointments, 3 of 4 participating rheumatologists adopted this approach during the pilot, which had the benefit of facilitating patient-led conversations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A DA-led strategy for tapering advanced therapy in RA was acceptable to patients and feasible in practice. Sending patients a DA ahead of their appointment facilitated patient-led conversations about tapering.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-0383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the experiences and perspectives of patients and rheumatologists on decision aid (DA)-led tapering of advanced therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Semistructured interviews were completed with patients and rheumatologists, embedded within a pilot study of DA-led tapering (ie, dose reduction) of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) in RA. All patients were in sustained (≥ 6 mos) remission and had chosen to reduce their therapy after a DA-led shared decision with their rheumatologist. The rheumatologists included those participating in the pilot (n = 4), and those who were not (n = 8). Reflexive thematic analysis of audiotaped and transcribed interviews identified themes in the group experiences.

Results: Patients (n = 10, 6 female) unanimously found the DA easy to understand and felt confident in shared decision making about treatment tapering and managing flares. Rheumatologists' (n = 12, 5 female) perspectives on tapering bDMARDs and tsDMARDs varied widely, from very supportive to completely opposed, and influenced their views on the DA. Rheumatologists expressed concerns about patient comprehension, destabilizing a stable situation, risks of flare, and extending appointment times. Despite their initial reservations about sending the DA to all eligible patients ahead of appointments, 3 of 4 participating rheumatologists adopted this approach during the pilot, which had the benefit of facilitating patient-led conversations.

Conclusion: A DA-led strategy for tapering advanced therapy in RA was acceptable to patients and feasible in practice. Sending patients a DA ahead of their appointment facilitated patient-led conversations about tapering.

类风湿性关节炎患者生物制剂和靶向合成 DMARDs 渐进治疗的辅助决策:定性研究。
目的探讨类风湿关节炎(RA)患者和风湿免疫科医生在辅助决策引导下减量治疗的经验和观点:对患者和风湿病学家进行了半结构式访谈,并将其纳入一项关于决策辅助引导的类风湿关节炎生物和靶向合成(b/ts)DMARDs减量(即减少剂量)试验研究中。所有患者均处于持续缓解期(>= 6 个月),并在与风湿免疫科医生共同做出辅助决策后选择减量治疗。风湿免疫科医生包括参与试点的医生(4 人)和未参与试点的医生。对录音和转录的访谈进行了反思性专题分析,确定了小组经验的主题:患者(人数=10;6 名女性)一致认为决策辅助工具易于理解,并对共同决策减少治疗和控制复发充满信心。风湿免疫科医生(12 人;5 位女性)对减量使用 b/ts DMARDs 的看法大相径庭,有的非常支持,有的则完全反对,这也影响了他们对决策辅助工具的看法。风湿免疫科医生对患者的理解能力、破坏稳定局势、复发风险和延长预约时间表示担忧。尽管他们最初对在预约前向所有符合条件的患者发送决策辅助工具持保留意见,但在试点期间,四位参与试点的风湿免疫科医生中有三位采用了这种方法,其好处是促进了以患者为主导的对话:结论:以决策辅助工具为主导的RA晚期治疗减量策略为患者所接受,在实践中也是可行的。在预约前向患者发送决策辅助工具有助于患者主导的关于减量治疗的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信