Social connection interventions and depression in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Clotilde Vazquez Alvarez, Luwaiza Mirza, Jayati Das-Munshi, Tassia Kate Oswald
{"title":"Social connection interventions and depression in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Clotilde Vazquez Alvarez, Luwaiza Mirza, Jayati Das-Munshi, Tassia Kate Oswald","doi":"10.1007/s00127-024-02722-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early adulthood is a period which may increase vulnerability to loneliness and mental health difficulties among young adults. Social networks play an important role in buffering against adverse mental health, but there is a lack of evidence around whether social connection interventions could play a role in preventing mental health difficulties for young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023395595). PubMed, PsycInfo, and Scopus were searched (01 January 2000-01 January 2023). Studies were eligible if they (i) were quantitative, (ii) included young adults (18-24 years) from the general population, (iii) tested a social intervention which aimed to increase the quantity or quality of social connections or reduce loneliness, (iv) had a comparison group, and (v) measured depression and loneliness/social connection as outcomes. Following study screening and selection, the data extraction and risk of bias assessments were independently conducted in duplicate. The Cochrane RoB-2 tool and ROBINS-I tool were used to assess risk of bias. Results were narratively synthesised and random effects meta-analysis with standardised mean differences was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included; four in-person interventions with higher education students, one online intervention with higher education students, and one intervention for youth involved in street life. The studies were mostly rated as having some or moderate concerns with risk of bias. The interventions were associated with an overall mean reduction in depression for young adults (SMD = -0.19; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.05; p = 0.008; 4 studies, excluding studies with serious risk of bias). All interventions had beneficial effects on a range of diverse social connection outcomes, but there was no overall statistically significant mean reduction in loneliness for young adults in pooled analyses (SMD = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.05; p = 0.188; 3 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social connection interventions show some promise in improving depression and social connection outcomes in young adults but more high-quality research, across diverse settings, is needed in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"549-562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02722-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Early adulthood is a period which may increase vulnerability to loneliness and mental health difficulties among young adults. Social networks play an important role in buffering against adverse mental health, but there is a lack of evidence around whether social connection interventions could play a role in preventing mental health difficulties for young adults.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023395595). PubMed, PsycInfo, and Scopus were searched (01 January 2000-01 January 2023). Studies were eligible if they (i) were quantitative, (ii) included young adults (18-24 years) from the general population, (iii) tested a social intervention which aimed to increase the quantity or quality of social connections or reduce loneliness, (iv) had a comparison group, and (v) measured depression and loneliness/social connection as outcomes. Following study screening and selection, the data extraction and risk of bias assessments were independently conducted in duplicate. The Cochrane RoB-2 tool and ROBINS-I tool were used to assess risk of bias. Results were narratively synthesised and random effects meta-analysis with standardised mean differences was conducted.

Results: Six studies were included; four in-person interventions with higher education students, one online intervention with higher education students, and one intervention for youth involved in street life. The studies were mostly rated as having some or moderate concerns with risk of bias. The interventions were associated with an overall mean reduction in depression for young adults (SMD = -0.19; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.05; p = 0.008; 4 studies, excluding studies with serious risk of bias). All interventions had beneficial effects on a range of diverse social connection outcomes, but there was no overall statistically significant mean reduction in loneliness for young adults in pooled analyses (SMD = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.05; p = 0.188; 3 studies).

Conclusion: Social connection interventions show some promise in improving depression and social connection outcomes in young adults but more high-quality research, across diverse settings, is needed in this area.

Abstract Image

社会联系干预措施与青少年抑郁症:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
目的:成年早期可能是青壮年更容易陷入孤独和心理健康困境的时期。社会网络在缓冲不良心理健康方面发挥着重要作用,但社会联系干预措施能否在预防青壮年心理健康问题方面发挥作用,目前还缺乏相关证据:方法:我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析(PROSPERO ID:CRD42023395595)。检索了 PubMed、PsycInfo 和 Scopus(2000 年 1 月 1 日-2023 年 1 月 1 日)。符合以下条件的研究均可作为研究对象:(i) 定量研究;(ii) 研究对象为普通人群中的年轻人(18-24 岁);(iii) 测试了旨在增加社会联系的数量或质量或减少孤独感的社会干预措施;(iv) 有对比组;(v) 将抑郁和孤独感/社会联系作为测量结果。在对研究进行筛选后,数据提取和偏倚风险评估均独立进行,一式两份。评估偏倚风险时使用了 Cochrane RoB-2 工具和 ROBINS-I 工具。对结果进行叙述性综合,并采用标准化均值差异进行随机效应荟萃分析:共纳入六项研究:四项针对高等教育学生的现场干预,一项针对高等教育学生的在线干预,以及一项针对参与街头生活的青少年的干预。这些研究大多被评为存在一定或中度偏倚风险。这些干预措施在总体上平均降低了年轻人的抑郁程度(SMD = -0.19;95% CI,-0.33 至 -0.05;p = 0.008;4 项研究,排除了存在严重偏倚风险的研究)。所有干预措施都对一系列不同的社会联系结果产生了有益影响,但在汇总分析中,年轻成年人的孤独感平均值总体上没有显著的统计学下降(SMD = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.05; p = 0.188; 3项研究):结论:社会联系干预措施在改善青壮年抑郁和社会联系结果方面显示出一定的前景,但这一领域还需要在不同环境下开展更多高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信