Caregiver and child perspectives of wellbeing in school-age children with childhood apraxia of speech.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Michelle Turner Swartz, Elaine R Hitchcock, Megan C Leece, Benedette M Herbst, Jonathan L Preston
{"title":"Caregiver and child perspectives of wellbeing in school-age children with childhood apraxia of speech.","authors":"Michelle Turner Swartz, Elaine R Hitchcock, Megan C Leece, Benedette M Herbst, Jonathan L Preston","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2024.2364808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a communication deficit that impacts a child's overall quality of life, including their academic and social interactions, yet few studies have investigated the impact from the child's perspective. Using The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework, we examined the children's and caregivers' perspectives on the impact of CAS on their overall wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Survey data were collected from 32 child-caregiver dyads for children ages 9-17 years with CAS. Items elicited responses along a 5-point scale to examine the perceived impact of children's speech impairments using the framework, including impact on communication, interpersonal interactions/relationships, and major life events.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Results from non-parametric statistical analyses revealed: (a) caregivers reported a significantly greater impact than children across individual ICF domains; (b) child responses were not significantly correlated with their caregiver's responses or with the child's age, gender, or severity indicators; and (c) both caregivers and children indicated the domain of communication was impacted more than other domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest a potential disconnect in the perceived impact of CAS between the caregiver and child. Recommendations include facilitating a dialogue between the child-caregiver dyad and considering treatment goals that address wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2364808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a communication deficit that impacts a child's overall quality of life, including their academic and social interactions, yet few studies have investigated the impact from the child's perspective. Using The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework, we examined the children's and caregivers' perspectives on the impact of CAS on their overall wellbeing.

Method: Survey data were collected from 32 child-caregiver dyads for children ages 9-17 years with CAS. Items elicited responses along a 5-point scale to examine the perceived impact of children's speech impairments using the framework, including impact on communication, interpersonal interactions/relationships, and major life events.

Result: Results from non-parametric statistical analyses revealed: (a) caregivers reported a significantly greater impact than children across individual ICF domains; (b) child responses were not significantly correlated with their caregiver's responses or with the child's age, gender, or severity indicators; and (c) both caregivers and children indicated the domain of communication was impacted more than other domains.

Conclusion: Results suggest a potential disconnect in the perceived impact of CAS between the caregiver and child. Recommendations include facilitating a dialogue between the child-caregiver dyad and considering treatment goals that address wellbeing.

照顾者和儿童对患有儿童语言障碍的学龄儿童幸福感的看法。
目的:儿童语言障碍(CAS)是一种交流障碍,会影响儿童的整体生活质量,包括学习和社会交往,但很少有研究从儿童的角度调查其影响。我们采用世界卫生组织的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)框架,研究了儿童和照顾者对 CAS 对其整体健康影响的看法:我们收集了 32 个儿童-照顾者二人组的调查数据,这些儿童的年龄在 9-17 岁之间,患有 CAS。调查项目采用 5 级量表,考察儿童语言障碍对沟通、人际交往/关系和主要生活事件的影响:非参数统计分析结果显示:(a) 在 ICF 的各个领域中,照顾者报告的影响明显大于儿童;(b) 儿童的回答与照顾者的回答或儿童的年龄、性别或严重程度指标无明显相关性;(c) 照顾者和儿童均表示沟通领域受到的影响大于其他领域:结论:研究结果表明,照料者和儿童对 CAS 影响的认知可能存在脱节。建议包括促进儿童与照顾者之间的对话,并考虑针对福利的治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信