Ready, Set, Goal: A Mixed Methods Study of a Goal-Setting Intervention on 2 Competency-Based Geriatric Medicine Rotations.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00069.1
Jillian Alston, Dov Gandell, Emilia Kangasjarvi, Ryan Brydges
{"title":"Ready, Set, Goal: A Mixed Methods Study of a Goal-Setting Intervention on 2 Competency-Based Geriatric Medicine Rotations.","authors":"Jillian Alston, Dov Gandell, Emilia Kangasjarvi, Ryan Brydges","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00069.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> More research is required to understand the effects of implementing structured goal-setting on trainee engagement in competency-based clinical learning environments. <b>Objective</b> To explore how residents experienced a rotation-specific goal-setting intervention on geriatric medicine rotations at 2 hospitals. <b>Methods</b> All rotating residents were expected to complete the intervention, consisting of a SMART-based (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound) goal-setting form and feedback sessions with teaching faculty. From November 2019 to June 2021, we recruited a convenience sample of rotating residents. Study participants completed pre- and postrotation 35-item Dutch Residency Educational Climate Test (D-RECT) questionnaires to compare scores from their rotation before the geriatric rotation and a postrotation semistructured interview, which we transcribed and analyzed using principles of constant comparison and reflexive thematic analysis. <b>Results</b> We interviewed 12 of 58 (20.7%) residents participating in the goal-setting intervention, 11 of whom completed both D-RECT questionnaires. Participants' D-RECT scores favored the geriatric medicine rotation versus the immediately preceding clinical rotation (M=4.29±0.37; M=3.84±0.44, <i>P</i>=.002). Analyses of interview transcripts yielded 3 themes on how participants perceived the intervention influenced their learning experience: (1) structured forms and processes mediate, inform, and constrain goal selection; (2) interactions with faculty, patients, and system factors influenced goal enactment; and (3) unstructured assessments led to uncertainty around goal achievement. Challenges included time restrictions and unpredictable clinical opportunities. <b>Conclusions</b> Goal-setting appeared to help many residents direct their learning efforts and engage in collaborative processes with teaching faculty. We identified challenges limiting residents' engagement with the goal-setting intervention, which may inform the practical implementation of goal-setting in other competency-based curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"16 4","pages":"453-460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00069.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background More research is required to understand the effects of implementing structured goal-setting on trainee engagement in competency-based clinical learning environments. Objective To explore how residents experienced a rotation-specific goal-setting intervention on geriatric medicine rotations at 2 hospitals. Methods All rotating residents were expected to complete the intervention, consisting of a SMART-based (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound) goal-setting form and feedback sessions with teaching faculty. From November 2019 to June 2021, we recruited a convenience sample of rotating residents. Study participants completed pre- and postrotation 35-item Dutch Residency Educational Climate Test (D-RECT) questionnaires to compare scores from their rotation before the geriatric rotation and a postrotation semistructured interview, which we transcribed and analyzed using principles of constant comparison and reflexive thematic analysis. Results We interviewed 12 of 58 (20.7%) residents participating in the goal-setting intervention, 11 of whom completed both D-RECT questionnaires. Participants' D-RECT scores favored the geriatric medicine rotation versus the immediately preceding clinical rotation (M=4.29±0.37; M=3.84±0.44, P=.002). Analyses of interview transcripts yielded 3 themes on how participants perceived the intervention influenced their learning experience: (1) structured forms and processes mediate, inform, and constrain goal selection; (2) interactions with faculty, patients, and system factors influenced goal enactment; and (3) unstructured assessments led to uncertainty around goal achievement. Challenges included time restrictions and unpredictable clinical opportunities. Conclusions Goal-setting appeared to help many residents direct their learning efforts and engage in collaborative processes with teaching faculty. We identified challenges limiting residents' engagement with the goal-setting intervention, which may inform the practical implementation of goal-setting in other competency-based curricula.

准备、设定、目标:在两个以能力为基础的老年医学轮转中进行目标设定干预的混合方法研究。
背景 需要开展更多研究,以了解在基于能力的临床学习环境中实施结构化目标设定对学员参与度的影响。目的 探讨在两家医院的老年医学轮转中,住院医师如何体验针对轮转的目标设定干预。方法 所有轮转住院医师都应完成干预措施,包括基于 SMART(具体、可衡量、可实现、相关、有时限)的目标设定表和与教学教师的反馈会议。从 2019 年 11 月到 2021 年 6 月,我们招募了一批方便的轮转住院医师样本。研究参与者完成了轮转前和轮转后的 35 项荷兰住院医师教育氛围测试(Dutch Residency Educational Climate Test,D-RECT)问卷,以比较他们在老年医学轮转前的分数,并完成了轮转后的半结构式访谈,我们采用恒定比较和反思性主题分析的原则对访谈进行了转录和分析。结果 我们对参加目标设定干预的 58 名住院医师中的 12 人(20.7%)进行了访谈,其中 11 人完成了两份 D-RECT 问卷。参与者的 D-RECT 得分更倾向于老年医学轮转,而不是之前的临床轮转(M=4.29±0.37;M=3.84±0.44,P=.002)。对访谈记录的分析得出了三个主题,即参与者认为干预措施如何影响了他们的学习体验:(1)结构化的形式和流程对目标选择起到了中介、告知和限制作用;(2)与教师、患者和系统因素的互动影响了目标的制定;以及(3)非结构化评估导致了目标实现的不确定性。挑战包括时间限制和不可预测的临床机会。结论 目标设定似乎有助于许多住院医师指导他们的学习努力,并参与到与教师的合作过程中。我们发现了限制住院医师参与目标设定干预的挑战,这些挑战可为在其他基于能力的课程中实际实施目标设定提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信