Rigid Thoracolumbar Orthosis Does Not Improve Outcomes of Acute Adolescent Spondylolysis as Compared With Placebo. Bony Union Predicts Improved Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up.
Ella Virkki, Milja Holstila, Terhi Kolari, Markus Lastikka, Kimmo Mattila, Sari Malmi, Olli Pajulo, Ilkka Helenius
{"title":"Rigid Thoracolumbar Orthosis Does Not Improve Outcomes of Acute Adolescent Spondylolysis as Compared With Placebo. Bony Union Predicts Improved Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Ella Virkki, Milja Holstila, Terhi Kolari, Markus Lastikka, Kimmo Mattila, Sari Malmi, Olli Pajulo, Ilkka Helenius","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective, comparative study on clinical, radiographic, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in adolescents with acute spondylolysis treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis (Boston brace) or with a placebo (elastic lumbar support) with a 2-year follow-up time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes of acute adolescent spondylolysis treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis or a placebo with a 2-year follow-up time.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefits of the use of rigid orthosis for the treatment of spondylolysis and achieving a bony union of spondylolysis remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixty consecutive patients with acute spondylolysis were prospectively enrolled. Three patients were excluded from the analysis as they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. The first 14 patients were randomized, and the remaining 46 chose the treatment method themselves. Treatment time was 4 months, and the follow-up time was 2 years. HRQoL was measured using the Scoliosis Research Society-24 (SRS-24) outcome questionnaire. The primary outcome was the HRQoL at 24 months and whether treatment type, bony union of the spondylolysis, or development of spondylolisthesis affected it.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty (30/57) patients were treated with a Boston brace, and 27 (27/57) patients with a placebo. The bony union rate of spondylolysis did not differ between study groups (20/30 vs. 17/27, respectively, P = 0.789). The HRQoL did not differ between treatment groups in the SRS-24 domains through follow-up ( P > 0.05 for all). Five patients (5/57) developed spondylolisthesis (mean slip: 4.2 mm) during the 2-year follow-up time. Nonunion of the spondylolysis predicted the development of spondylolisthesis ( P = 0.005), but the treatment type did not affect it ( P > 0.05). Two years after treatment, patients who had bony union had higher SRS-24 total ( P = 0.005) and satisfaction domain ( P < 0.001) compared with patients with nonunion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A rigid brace is not necessary for the treatment of acute spondylolysis. Achieving a bony union of adolescent spondylolysis is desirable as their HRQoL is higher at 2 years.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"454-462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: A prospective, comparative study on clinical, radiographic, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in adolescents with acute spondylolysis treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis (Boston brace) or with a placebo (elastic lumbar support) with a 2-year follow-up time.
Objective: To compare outcomes of acute adolescent spondylolysis treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis or a placebo with a 2-year follow-up time.
Background: The benefits of the use of rigid orthosis for the treatment of spondylolysis and achieving a bony union of spondylolysis remain unclear.
Patients and methods: Sixty consecutive patients with acute spondylolysis were prospectively enrolled. Three patients were excluded from the analysis as they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. The first 14 patients were randomized, and the remaining 46 chose the treatment method themselves. Treatment time was 4 months, and the follow-up time was 2 years. HRQoL was measured using the Scoliosis Research Society-24 (SRS-24) outcome questionnaire. The primary outcome was the HRQoL at 24 months and whether treatment type, bony union of the spondylolysis, or development of spondylolisthesis affected it.
Results: Thirty (30/57) patients were treated with a Boston brace, and 27 (27/57) patients with a placebo. The bony union rate of spondylolysis did not differ between study groups (20/30 vs. 17/27, respectively, P = 0.789). The HRQoL did not differ between treatment groups in the SRS-24 domains through follow-up ( P > 0.05 for all). Five patients (5/57) developed spondylolisthesis (mean slip: 4.2 mm) during the 2-year follow-up time. Nonunion of the spondylolysis predicted the development of spondylolisthesis ( P = 0.005), but the treatment type did not affect it ( P > 0.05). Two years after treatment, patients who had bony union had higher SRS-24 total ( P = 0.005) and satisfaction domain ( P < 0.001) compared with patients with nonunion.
Conclusion: A rigid brace is not necessary for the treatment of acute spondylolysis. Achieving a bony union of adolescent spondylolysis is desirable as their HRQoL is higher at 2 years.
期刊介绍：
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
